Dinesh Kandpal
11 October 2013 at 23:23
Are there any restriction to hoist religious flag temporarily in a society premises for a private individual function? Can an individual flat member of any community raise any objection? Is there a need to take NOC from society or builder? pls guide.
Umesh
08 October 2013 at 13:36
Four years have passed after framing charges against accused and the complainant is not turning up to depose in court. Court is not closing prosecution evidence and says untill he does not turn up court will continue giving dates. Is it right?
Rama mohan Acharya
08 October 2013 at 10:38
An empoloyee was under bond obligation.Company located at Lucknow. Since he failed to discharge the obligation & left the services, a recovery suit was filed in the Civil Court at Lucknow. The case was decreed (exparte) in favour of the Employer.Thereafter the employer filed an application for execution of the decree. It was understood by the employer that the particular employee has now been working at Odisha, hence applied to dend the notice to odisha. earlier the court acceeded to send the notice to Andhra pradesh on the basis of the application by the employer. Now there is achange of Judge. The new judge syas that this court has no jurisdiction to change the adress to Odisha. The Employer's submission was that since the previous Judge, after hearing both the parties acceeded to he request of the employer to change the adress, the same is binding on the court now.
Can this stand really good? Can the new judge take a different view in the same case in the same court? Kindly advise.
Nishant Desai
08 October 2013 at 04:00
I am in USA on H1 visa and my wife is here with me on H4 visa. We both are Indian citizen an hold valid Indian passports and valid Visa for USA. We are expecting our baby to born here in USA. We will return back to India in 1-2 yrs and do not have plans to settle down in USA. We went through different forums and articles on internet on pros & cons of having baby born to an Indian parents in USA. We are very confused about citizenship of our baby.
I kindly request you to take your time and guide me on below listed questions.
(1) Will baby get USA citizenship by virtue of having born here?
(2) Will he/she be eligible to get Indian Citizenship as well? If yes, how can we proceed to get Indian citizenship for our baby at/after his/her birth in USA?
If we consider to get US passport for our baby and get PIO for him/her to travel to India,
(1) Will he/she be considered as non-citizen of India and what will he be able to get equal opportunity as an Indian citizen for education in schools/colleges, employment, opening bank account, applying PAN card etc? Or he/she will treated in different category for all this rights?
(2) I understood that PIO is valid for 15 years? Can it be renewed after 15 years in India itself? Can baby travel frequently to and from India with PIO card?
(3) Can my child have right to decide on which citizenship he/she wants once turn to 18years age? Can he/she surrender US passport at US consulate in India and apply for Indian passport, thus accepting Indian citizenship and renouncing US citizenship?
If we consider to get birth registered at Indian Consulate/Embassy in USA and get Indian passport
(1) Will baby gain Indian citizenship by registering birth at Indian Consulate and getting Indian passport? Will baby still be considered as USA citizen and is there any need that we need to get Visa for baby for stay in USA?
(2) Will we face any problem at any airport in the world to travel back to India with baby on his Indian Passport?
(3) I read on Internet that, in this case if kid needs to come back to USA in future with Indian Passport, US consulate in India will not give visa to my child as it will be US born. In this case it is impossible to travel to US in future.Can you please throw some light on this scenario? What could be best mitigation for this?
Please guide us. Your guidance will be highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
NKD
lalhriatpuia
07 October 2013 at 22:24
can you tell me ruling of either high courts or supreme court on the detail discussion/ explanation/meaning of FREEDOM TO MANAGE RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS under article 26(b) of the Constitution of India, please.
rahul agrawal
05 October 2013 at 21:18
Can I file a PIL directly to the Chief Justice of India online?
if yes , then how ? plz help me..
arvind
05 October 2013 at 10:33
The above act empowers the collector to calculate compensation for the land owners affected by rstrictions on their land by the above act.he act gives complete deta to this procedure.The collector acts on behalf of central govt./defense authorities a per the act being the chief revenue officer of the district.The only scope of hearing given in the act is for land owners in the court if they are disastisfied with collectors award and there also the proceedings are to be restricted to the interest of land owners as per the act.Are dfense authorities entitled for a hearing before the collector before he passes the award?They are not the aggrieved party, they are beneficiaries by imposition of restrictions on the land, it is the land owners who are the aggrieved party?
M.BASAVARAJA
05 October 2013 at 08:56
Dear Sir,
kindly help me to file the writ petition on Law university-karnataka.please suggest or improve the below matter.
1. The petitioner joined 3 years LL.B Course in the year 2009 at Law College, and completed the 3rd year LL.B Semester Course in December 2012 with securing aggregate 44.3214% through respondent’s university. The details of marks obtained the petitioner in each semester is as follows:
Semester
Maximum marks
Marks obtained
Percentage of marks
I semester
500
208
41.06
II semester
500
208
41.06
III semester
500
227
45.04
IV semester
400
171
42.75
V semester
400
191
47.75
VI Semester
500
236
47.02
Grand total
2,800
1,241
44.32
The petitioner is here with producing the photo copy of the consolidated statement of marks for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court & the same is at Annexure-1.
2. The petitioner desirous to pursue higher studies in Post-graduation i.e. LL.M at respondent’s university, for which, the respondent’s university prescribed the minimum percentage of marks i.e. 45% in aggregate for general category students in order to admission to LL.M. Further, it is submitted that the respondent’s university regulation provides that the students who obtained aggregate percentage of marks i.e. 44.5 % & above shall be treated as 45 % and thereby he is allowed to admission for LL.M. Post-Graduation Course at respondent’s university. The photo copy of the LL.M. Admission regulations of respondent’s University is herewith enclosed at Annexure-2.
3. The petitioner has obtained 44.3214 % as the aggregate percentage of marks in 3 years LL.B Course as such, he is not eligible for the admission of LL.M. Course since he is shortage of 0.18 % to the requisite percentage is 44.5% as prescribed by the respondent’s university regulation.
4. When such being the condition, the petitioner has wrote a letter dated
01-07-2013 to the Register Evaluation of Respondent’s University with a request that the petitioner may be allowed to take improve of his 3 years LL.B percentage. The said letter was personally served upon the respondent’s university on 01-07-2013 and who endorsed to that effect. The said letter is enclosed herewith at Annexure-3. The said Register Evaluation, in spite of receipt of petitioner’s above said letter, has failed to reply or respond to said letter the reasons are best known to said authority.
5. When the petitioner has failed to receive any reply to his above said letter from the Register of Evaluation, the petitioner has forced to write a letter dated 19-8-2013 to the respondent through the principal of Vunki Sanna Rudrappa Law College, Bellary and the same was sent to respondent’s University and Register of Evaluation of KSLU, Hubli, by Speed Post. After receipt of petitioner’s above said second letter dated 19-8-2013, the respondent university had replied to the petitioner through e-mail stating that there is no such regulation of KSLU for seeking improvement of petitioner’s result. You should have anticipated and calculated your tentative percentage well before the expiry of RV/CV (Revaluation or Challenge valuation) Chance. The photo copy of letter dated 19-8-2013 as annexure-4, speed post receipt as annexure-5, e-mail reply by respondent’s University at annexure-6 are herewith enclosed for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court.
6. The petitioner, on receipt of his sixth semester statement of marks, came to that he got less than 45% or 44.5% in aggregate of 3 years LL.B Marks and by the time, the R.V/C.V time was completed. And there is scope of improvement of his marks alone but on verifying the e-mail reply sent by the respondent’s University, petitioner came to know that there is no such regulation for the improvement as per the regulations of the KSLU. Hence, the petitioner has lost his opportunity for pursuing the higher studies i.e. LL.M. in respondent’s University due to short fall of his percentage in 3 years LL.B. Course and the affecting or curtails his fundamental right. As a result, the petitioner has no option except to invoke the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court and thereby to give directions of the respondent’s university to insert a provision for improvement in 3 years LL.B Course examination so as to enhance or increase his marks in KSLU’s regulations by way of writ of Mandamus & Certiorari to respondent’s university.
7. It is relevant to submit that the respondent’s University provides a chance of improvement to its Post-graduation students i.e. LL.M vide regulation and the said regulation copy is herewith enclosed at annexure-8 for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. But the respondent’s University has not provided such improvement chance of 3 year LL.B. Course students, as such, the respondent’s university is discriminating improvement chance to 3 year LL.B students and the same is violating the fundamental rights of the 3 year LL.B students and the same is to be rectified by this Hon’ble Court by giving directions to respondent’s university insert a provision for improvement in 3 years LL.B Course examination so as to enhance or increase students marks in KSLU’s regulations by way of writ of Mandamus & Certiorari to respondent’s university.
8. The court fee of Rs.100/- is paid on this writ petition under section of K.C.F & S.V. Act.
9. It is germane to submit that the petitioner is herewith producing the photocopy of the regulations as framed by the Vishweswaraya Technological University (VTU) Belgum, wherein the
10. The petitioner, therefore, prays that the Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to issue directions to the respondent’s University to insert the provision for improvement of 3 years LL.B results by appearing in re-examination of any semester so as to enhance or increase students’ marks like petitioner herein, in KSLU’s regulations by way of writ of Mandamus & Certiorari to respondent’s university and such insertion of improvement regulation would be effect from retrospective one, which would meet the ends of justice.
M.Basavaraja
Karnataka
sudhir
04 October 2013 at 21:23
Dear Sir,
Are Non Grantable Teachers are applicable for election Duty ??????
Can we approach to election duty officer
as we are non grantable Staff hence election duty is not applicable for us even
if we are working in Grantable college.
Second thing I have a small baby of 7 month
who having breast feeding.
QUERY ASKED ON BEHALF OF MY WIFE
request you reply on "sudhirpawar@hotmail.com"
regard
Sudhir
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Public-interest litigation for grassroots innovator and researcher
Respected Sir,
I have to file Public-interest litigation (PIL) in the matter of rights of Indian innovator and researcher, and I have following queries regarding file PIL, therefore I request to you give me proper guideline with proper reference.
1) Can I applicable to file (PIL Application) national level matter (the matter is completely in public interest) in Bombay High Court. Actually I confused that the matter is the national level not only the state level than can I applicable to file PIL in Bombay High Court or it should be needed in such matter in Supreme Court only.
2) My English speaking is not very fluent to describe my matter in court, in that of condition can I describe my matter in Hindi language. I inform you that, I want to handle this case without advocate. Suggest me free or economical solution. Can court will allow me to explain my side in Hindi whatever I have given my application in English or Hindi. Please provide me such authorize document which will clear me all about language problem and solution regarding HC/SC.
3) In my case respondents is Government of India, than actually what is the Name & address of Government of India, actually I have sent same matter request to many departments of Government of India but in this PIL case I want to make respondents only Government of India that’s the confusion Name & address of Government of India.
4) Can legally government or court will provide me advocate without any fee or nominal fees, If yes than how I can achieve this facility. I am in OBC cast, and my annual income is nearly 300000/-.
5) Please suggest me any proper deep article or book so I can understand PIL procedure completely
In all above matters please guide me with authorize reference of SC/HC.
Please help me to resolve problem of our grassroots innovator and researcher.
I look forward to receive your reply soon.
Regards,
Yogesh Sonar