Anonymous
08 May 2010 at 12:55
Is absconder can avail the right of privacy and right under article 21?
Anonymous
04 May 2010 at 22:58
Can a Srilankan Citizen married to a Indian citizen is eligible for PIO / OCI? Please advice.
Anonymous
04 May 2010 at 22:55
Respected Sir,
I first thanks to all members who gives there valuable opinion time ti time. Now I am in great dilemma what to do and I am hundred present conform that here I got a right solution.
I am Cost Accountant & presently working as Sr. Accountant in a construction company Head office based in Ahmadabad and I am posted at Ajmer Site I submitted my resiganation the copy of my resignation is as below which I submitted on 30.04.2010
"Due to some family problem, I hereby submit my resignation from your company with immediate effect.
I am extremely thankful to the management for patronage time to time guidance and knowledge during the tenure of my service. This is very painful moments in my life to give resignation from this growing company where I treated like a family member
As per the terms and conditions given in the offer letter, I am ready to give 7days notice period.
I shall be highly obliged if you please arrange to clear my all dues and issue me No Objection Certificate as earliest as possible.
As I booked my Railway ticket on 15.05.2010, So Please release me on or before 15.05.2010"
But after submission my resignation I did not get any response from my company
My question is:
1)What I understand that my resignation is accepted by Management?
2)What happen if I not get my all dues?(Since Feb-10 to till now I not received Salary)
3)What should I do in this conditions as I am belongs to Kolkata and my Head Office is in Ahmadabad, if I go to Kolkata then that happens towards my outstanding amount which is more then Rs 50,000/-
4)Should I clam for bonus that declare by company but yet not given?
Pls help me,I am waiting for your opinion
Thanking you
mukesh
03 May 2010 at 07:51
Dear sir,
I would like to know that in INDIA who can use The national emblem on his/her letter pad visiting card etc.....
mukesh
02 May 2010 at 08:42
An applicant approached an organisation - notified by a State Government in the official Gazette as a "intelligence and security organisation" - with an RTI application. The applicant approached the designated PIO of that organisation and asked for information that he claimed pertained to violation of his human right. At first, the PIO responded saying that the Public Authority concerned is not bound to give the information. When told that even an exempted organisation has to give information pertaining to human rights`violation, the PIO argued that he was not convinced that the information involved human right violation. The applicant mentioned to the PIO that he is well-versed with the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 and that he will not hesitate to pursue his case not just with the Information Commission concerned`, but if need be, he'd go all the way to the Supreme Court. Hearing this, the PIO felt that it would be o.k. to give information to the applicant right away to avoid any further hassles. In fact, the First Appellate Authority too had asked the PIO to do so Is the applicant right in thinking that he can go all the way to the Supreme Court seeking a remedy if he is not satisfied, because he thinks that the information he is seeking pertains to a violation of his human right?
HAI FRIENDS,
I REQUEST THE EXPERTS TO PROCURE ME THE VALUES AND WHAT THE LAWYERS DRESS CODE EXACTLY RESEMBLES.
Anonymous
30 April 2010 at 21:01
what is the best way to keep a check on the judiciary?
RESPECTED SIR, I HAVE A MOOT COURT PROBLEM, CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF PUBLIC SAFETY ACT[THIS IS AN ACT OF KASHMIR].UNDER THIS ACT A PERSON CAN BE PREVENTIVLY DETAINED. THIS IS ALMOST SIMILAR IN NATURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY ACT.I AM ON STATE SIDE AND I HAVE TO DEFEND THIS LAW. SO PLEASE PROVIDE ME MATERIAL IN MY SUPPORT.
Anonymous
29 April 2010 at 11:10
An order by electricity ombudsman lucknow has upheld the judgement passed by District electricity consumer forum in favour of the consumer. order of ombudsman challenged by electricity deptt before high court but deptt could not get any interim only time granted for counter and rejoinder. my question is whether deptt is liable to pay immediately to the consumer and if not paying what remedy available.
Consumer Protection Act 1986
The President of State Forum Tamilnadu had on occurring of a vacancy of the only member’s post due to his retirement, had promulgated an order that he is utilizing the powers conferred on him under sec 16 1(B) (ii) and constituting an one member bench and that the so constituted bench member will be himself. He was hearing the complaints then on. No one from legal quarters had raised any objection. Was he right in interpreting the rule?