Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   18 May 2010 at 18:14

public interest litigation

Are there any laws or rules that controls the forceful collection of chandaas and subscriptions during the poojas of Dusheera ansd Ganesh pooja. And if there are any laws and can they be implemented for the skae and inthe intersts of the generaland poor public

poushali bhandari   17 May 2010 at 21:57

national anthem

can any dance performance be made on our national anthem?
is there any specific law?
is there any relevant judgement?

Anonymous   14 May 2010 at 14:55

PIL Against Govt and SC in Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case

"BHOPAL: Twenty five years after the December 3, 1984 Bhopal gas tragedy, a local court will issue verdict on June 7 against the Union Carbide and other respondents in the case.

CBI had chargesheeted Union Carbide Corporation, Union Carbide (India) Limited, Union Carbide (Eastern) Hong Kong, UCC chairman Warren Anderson and eight Indian officials for the tragedy on December 1, 1987. Thousands of people were killed in the gas poisoning."

Dear Learned Experts,

Though the current trend is to discourage PILs (in the name of 'Publicity Interest Litigation'), is it possible to file PIL against the Govt and SC for having failed to deliver the justice in time, in the above case?

Bhumika Sharma   14 May 2010 at 14:49

SLP

I need a sample of SLP.

Secondly what question of law arises in following case-

that the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (HPPSC) issued advertisement No.IV/2007 inviting applications for filling up 12 vacancies of Civil Judges (Junior Division). The advertisement specified that out of these vacancies two are reserved for scheduled castes, one for scheduled tribe and four for other backward classes candidates of H.P. resultantly, five vacancies could be said to fall to the share of the general category.
The non-appellant qualified the written examination also and was called for interview. The interviews were held on 9th and 10th of January, 2008. He made several requests in the matter, no letter of appointment was ever issued to him. Before the Hon’ble High Court, he contended that the State has made excessive reservation and has carried forward the reservation for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and other backward classes for more than three years which is not permissible. The validity of the circular dated 26.7.1989 issued by the State of H.P. whereby posts falling to the category of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes can be carried forward indefinitely was challenged.


In CWP No. 1624 /2008 & CWP No. 1122/2009 the circular dated 26.7.1989 removing the time cap and making the carry over rule perpetual in nature was held to be illegal and liable to be struck down. The High Court held that the non-appellant shall rank senior to all the candidates selected in the year 2009 since he was selected two years earlier and should have been offered appointment at that stage itself. He shall hold that the seats of OBCs could only be carried forward for three recruitment years and no further. Consequently, the seats falling to the category of OBCs for the year 2009 shall be reduced by deducting the seats carried forward for more than three years and selections made from the general category candidates if found suitable.


jyotirmaya behera   13 May 2010 at 22:49

BCI license

what is the procedure for the lawyer license (BCI)?
who pass the law how he/she can do license? which document will need?

Anonymous   13 May 2010 at 17:21

Right to Privacy

Dear sir/madam,
My personal email account has been hacked and the mails have been forwarded to others without my knowledge. Apart from this, some other information which was for my personal eye was wrongfully and decietfully bought into the public eye and this has caused me a lot of trouble and have made me the centre of unwanted attention. Can i claim that my right to privacy has been breached ??

Anonymous   11 May 2010 at 22:37

Remedy for BSNL employee

A person in Tamilnadu State is an employee in his town BSNL. regarding his Seniority and promotion, he sent a representation and the higher officials rejected his plea. What is his remedy?

Writ or What ?

pratik   11 May 2010 at 11:54

High Court & Supreme Court.

Question: Two conflicting decision of diff HC (High Court) one is of single bench while other is of db of diff HC which is to follow?

Answer: Single bench decision of the HC of the same state has got binding effect than larger bench decision of HC of different state. Single Bench decision of the HC is more binding on that state than the db decision of HC of some other state.

As per which act or section the abovementioned answer is right pls tell me or any case laws. Is it applicable to appeallable tribunal & supreme court.

Any case laws .

Thanking U All Learned Members in advance.

KADIWALAMA   10 May 2010 at 23:03

binding precedent

two conflicting decision of diff hc one is of single bench while other is of db of diff hc which is to follow?

Anonymous   08 May 2010 at 23:09

RTI and Writ before HC

Ld counsels,

The fact of the case is that I filed a RTI applcition before police to obtain complaint copies. I came to know that the complaint was tampered by police. Sicne I obtained Anticipatory bail from HC on this complaint the records were also available with the office of public prosecutor. I have obtained the above 2 orders from the commission with one directing the office of public prosecutor to furnish the information and another to initiate departmental enquiry against the police for giving false and fabricated information.

Now the office of public prosecutor has field a writ challenging the order of commission saying that this office is not under the purview of RTI and as such no information can be given as directed even through the orders of the govt. I have also petitioned the CM cell for directions to PP office to give the information.

The information to be given by the office of PP is important for my criminal case and they are denying it mainly bcos the tampered complaint copy is also inserted into their records. more over the allegations in eh tampered complaint are improved which were not revealed to the HC during the hearing of my bail petition.

Now can I file a Writ petition before HC for non-complaince to the order of the information commission and seek directions for prosecute all the public authorities involved in fabricating and denying information. I have 2 order of state information commission which is not complied by the public authorities. Even the polcie commissioner is not conducting deprmental enquiry as per the orders of the commission.
Is it possible to mingle the 2 RTI orders in one Writ petition and approach the HC for imposing penalty and disciplinary action the cause of action for both the RTI complaints are one and the same.


Pls clarify. Thanks for reading my query.