Joypreet Singh
19 September 2010 at 13:57
Is there any law that one can only appoint to lowest position (Clerk) in Category 3 of government service even if his deceased family member was holding highest post in Category 3 and if his heir is highly qualified like B.Tech and M.B.A.
Parthasarathi Loganathan
19 September 2010 at 09:18
Thousands of temples having history of several centuries are the precious marvel in our country. Architectural wonder, cost of construction, maintenance,etc should have involved huge amount even in those days. Hence many properties are donated to such temples by several generations and documents are either missing or destroyed. Subsequent generations knowingly or unknowingly acquired and even alienated making those historical temples in dilapidated conditions and also get ruined day by day without financial support. Archaeological Survey of India has no powers to restore the properties.
My query is, is there any law in the country to restore the property back to such historic temples or any enactment required to restore the lost historical glory of such temples under ruins now. A Research study tells that, if all such immovable properties are restored back to their respective temples, then the income generated can feed the entire poor in this country and there can be no poverty. Please contribute your expertise on this subject.
Anonymous
19 September 2010 at 05:03
Dear Counsels,
Is it possible to request the Chief Justice of High Court to post a Writ Appeal case before the full bench.
Since case allocation is being done by CJ. Or can I also request the concerned deputy registrar to post it before the full bench.
Please clarify thanks.
Anonymous
18 September 2010 at 22:06
Please refer the statement of lawyer at http://www.hindustantimes.com/Pune--lawyer-to-represent-accused-in-German-Bakery-blast-case/Article1-601828.aspx
The layer states that accused has the constitutional right to be considered innocent till proven guilty.
1) Please tell me under which article this constitutional right is conferred on accused.
2) If it is indeed a constitutional right then how come we had laws like TADA etc. were accused is assumed guilty and he has to prove his guilt
Anonymous
18 September 2010 at 19:47
is it possible to club special leave petition( which has been converted into civil appeal) and presidential reference in same case by consent order
Anonymous
18 September 2010 at 13:28
after being withdrawn also i have submitted an application for reconsideration of withdrawal to commandant which was not forwarded even, does my submitting an application will be construed as adhering to the 2nd principle of natural justice? what does principle of natural justice means in easy/simple terms?
Anonymous
18 September 2010 at 13:23
i am gentleman cadet rishi rathi,undergoing training at indian military academy,dehradun,from there i have been withdrawn on disciplinary grounds due to excessive punishments,i seriously wish to get re-instated.before withdrawal no written notice was served to me, no court of inquiry was done, no board/tribunal was constituted to look into the disciplinary charges,in march-up also the commandant read his decision and no chance was given to me to speak/open my mouth even and i was withdrawn, is this the violation of principles of natural justice? ima is now claiming that they gave me a chance to speak and i had declined but in reality they never gave me a chance to speak, how can i prove that they did not gave me a chance to speak?
Daksh
17 September 2010 at 09:27
Dear All,
We all know for sure that in open court Mr.Bhushan while arguing the case has submitted a list of Retired Chief Justice of Apex Court and dared the court to open the envelope.
I want to seek your considered views/opinion that is it appropriate for any officer of the court (be it a Senior Advocate or Ex Law Minister)to conduct himself in a more dignified way. It is evident that two wrongs cannot make a thing right still by playing for the gallary what lesson it will convey for the younger aspiring lot of professionals.
(Believe it I am not commenting on the merits of the case but my concern is solely how the Bench and Bar conducts itself for the betterment of this profession).
Thanking You and best regards
D
A
K
S
H
Anonymous
17 September 2010 at 08:00
Sir/Madam,
I have attached the file Query.pdf. Please read it to understand my questions.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Chief Justice of India.
Pls Experts Guide me .
Difference between Chief Justice of India, Chief Justice of High Court (Of any high court) & Judge (Whether it may be single ,division, full bench).
Pls help me out.
1) What is the difference between the above parties & there powers, liabilities.
2) How can bind Whom ? If Possible with the examples. Why do different high court in different state have CJI & Judge Both. What are there duities & how can interfer in the others work. (Eg : Judge can interfer in CJI Work or Vice - versa). How is most imp persons during the appeal , at the time of decree passed & in normal court hours. Can we say that there are Public servant as per the Section 21 of the Indian penal code, 1860.
Thanking U All Experts In Advance.