Anonymous
24 February 2011 at 16:55
Dear LD friends
As per the Indian Contract Act contracts entered between two parties if is one sided then such contract would be null and void. Most of the Bonds are one sided.
In India Bond is illegal w.r.t employment since as per the Indian Statute, bonded labor system was long abolished and no bond can force any person to work against the employees wishes.
Article 19 of Indian Constitution talks of fundamental rights, as per the Article 19 the Constitution the write work is a fundamental right, and under no circumstance does the Fundamental rights under Article 19 be waived by any person nor can any person be forced to do something that amounting to the violation of the rights mentioned under Article 19.
Let me know is this right or wrong my view.
Anonymous
24 February 2011 at 11:14
a supreme court judge can hear proceedings anywhere, like at his residence also. can somebody provide me case ruling for this...?? itss urgent..
Arka Foundation
22 February 2011 at 17:31
Dear Ld Members
The Police is impartial to one our client in a 498a case, as the ex-wife of our client is lawyer of daughter.
Any judgements/citations on ...
1) Every Individual is Innocent Till
Proven Guilty
2) Every Individual is Equal Before the Law
Rgds
AF
Swami Sadashiva Brahmendra Sar
22 February 2011 at 00:23
Reserve category candidates who obtained the rank of general category in merit list have been placed in the general category's select list. Whether at the time of allocation of service they can be treated as reserve category?
pradyot kumar biswas
16 February 2011 at 17:16
In 2003 PSC received 40 applications for a single vacant post.In 2010 PSC received 35 applications for the same vacant post and out of which 16 were summarily rejected for not having essential qualification. There was only mention of essential qualfn. in the advt. and no other qualfn. like desirable or any other qualfn. was mentioned.
The undersigned appeared in interview in 2003 when 40 applications were received but in 2010 discarded by the PSC to appear in interview on the ground of a clause in information booklet in advt. The clause says that PSC can restrict the no. of applicants for interview when large no. of applications are received by PSC and it is not convenient or possible for PSC to call all applicants for interview. This restriction will be imposed on the basis of qualifn. or experience. This clause was in existence in the year 2003.
The undersigned have been denied his right in the year 2010 when no. of applications were 35 but enjoyed his right with less experience in the year 2003.
Can PSC take such arbitrary decision defining large no. of applications different in different year.
p. k. biswas
Anonymous
15 February 2011 at 13:08
There is a clause in the information booklet of Public Service Commission stating that PSC can restrict the no.of candidates for interview on the basis of qualification or experience if the no. of received applications is large and it is not possible or convenient for the PSC to call all applicants for interview.
For a certain post PSC received 40 applications in 2003 and the undersigned was called for interview. For the same post in 2010 PSC received 35 applications out of which 16 were rejected for not having essential qualification, 4 were rejected on the above mentioned clause of information booklet and 15 were interviewed. The undersigned is in group of 4. Having the higher experience than 2003 the undersigned was discarded from the interview in 2010. Is it fair and legally tenable?
Anonymous
14 February 2011 at 22:18
Respected law experts,
In case of accidental death postmortem/autopsy report to be given to the
deceased relative within how many days?does
it differ from state to state?
pl.suggest.
Regards
p babu
14 February 2011 at 14:56
There is an irreconciable contradiction between two sections of the same ACT. What is the rule of interpretation in such a case Discuss:
pl give reference to us.
p babu
14 February 2011 at 14:51
"Y" got served a notice to 'Z'through unregistered way for eviction of his property. 'Z' received the same and kept quite. Explain the position of 'Y' to take against 'Z'.
pl give reference case law.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Is it any offense?
If name of person for example is Ravi Kumar Yadav on driving license, PAN Card etc. and writes his name as Ravi Kumar or R. Kumar in his RTI application and/or Writ/PIL Petition to safeguard his caste identity to avoid bias and prejudice. Is he committing any offense?