hi... sir.. i need your help..please help me ... can you give me answer.. sir my friend born in rajasthan state but he completed his school and college study in gujarat and now he has gujarat domicile certificate he married with rajasthan girl. so can his wife apply gujarat state goverment jobs including panchayat ..jobs..
How to understand that which judgment is a landmark judgment & the other is only a judgment.
meaning of landmark judgment.
and difference between judgment & landmark judgment.
Thanks
Artilce 15. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.-
(1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.
(3) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.
Question: Artilce 15(1) say that there should be no discrimintaion between sex etc. & in contary the sub rule 3 say that if the sate goverment can make the provision for women & children also it say that nothing in this artilce means artilce 15 will attract sub rule 3 can't we say that artilce 15(3) makes the discrmintation between sex.
so which will prevail artilce 15(1) or 15(3).
any case to understand it more properly in depth.
What does biological father & mother means.
thanks
Artilce 18. Abolition of titles.-
(1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.
(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.
Question: Meaning Of Titles in the above metioned artilce. any example so do understnad it more properly.
Thanks
Dear Friends,
I am in view of to eradicate corruption in our country, it is very necessary to amend fundamental right to property given to the citizens of India through constitution of India,subject to upper cap of 5 lac rupees should be imposed to Right to property .Healthy discussions invited hereby.
sir i was employed in one central govt dept for 11 yrs and thereafter through open selection i moved to another govt dept on lien for 1 year thereafter i got selected in another dept through open selection and moved from second place within 10 months and terminated my lien at first place.in the mean time the present dept received a letter against me confidentially without my knowledge from the 1st employer and based on that false letter the present employer is directing me to to go and report at first department without holding any enquiry or providing me an oppurtunity as i have already moved my family to new place i cannot immediately go back as i have already severed ties with them it is a fact that he is acting illegally.can i file a case under s 182 of ipc also if anybody is there in chennai whom i can conatct personally please reply URGENT
Whether the decision passed by the any tribunal in the state can be overruled by the high court?
Whether the high court has jurisdiction to overrule the decision passed by the tribunal dealing with the specified subject?
please inform me the answer as well as supported case law with respect to it.
What all parameters be satisfied to prove whether some arms or enterprise is a instrumentally of the state or not?
Can a govt employee run a private venture ? If yes under what circumstances and under what auth?
Can nac be prosecuted in international criminal court
s the National Advisory Council[NAC] above the Prime Minister? If not what are its powers vis a vis those of the Prime Minister and the Parliament ? If yes then is it obligatory for the Parliament or the Prime Minister to obey the directions of the NAC? Since all bills/directions submitted by the NAC[ nac.nic.in] are obeyed by the Parliament and all bills etc. submitted in the Parliament are first ratified by the NAC,is this NAC above the Parliament? As the Congress President is also the Chair person of the NAC can the said Chairperson be considered the Supreme Ruler of India as a Constitutional or an extra Constitutional Authority? Since the Chairperson comes within the jurisdiction of the Rome Statue having an Italian Citizenship [Italy submitted itself to the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court],can the said Italian Ruler be Prosecuted in the International Criminal Court in any violation of the Rome Statute?
Note: ONLY SERIOUS ANSWERS PLEASE BY THOSE HAVING THE GUTS.