Hi,
I recently applied for my Passport renewal and received my renewed Passport.
Police Post verification was initiated, after the stipulated three weeks when the police did not contact me I contacted the concerned Police station, they told me that they have not received the documents from Passport office. On contacting the Passport Office I was informed that Police report has been received by them saying Address mentioned is wrong.
Passport office has resend documents again for Re-Verification. This according to the concerned Police station has not been received by them yet.
I have to go abroad urgently for six months on a company assignment.
Can I travel abroad before the Police Post verification is done?
What procedures should I follow to avoid any problems in future?
Than You very much
Regards,
VimalKumar.
sir,
I filed an case against the Govt of karnataka and Accountant General and Deputy Director of Treasury in the year 2006 challenging the order passed by them reducing the pay by an increment and ordering recovery of excess payment on the ground that my pay has been wrongly fixed in the year 1994 that is after 12 years and that too without giving notice.
But matter has so far not come up for hearing in the KAT as I have now already retired
Question is whether should i with draw the case and put up with loss of one increment? If So what is other legal remedies available other than waiting to conclude the case in the KAT so that i can get back one increment denied to me from the year 2006?
I need comments from the experts on my following Legal points:-
We need to file a Comprehensive Writ Petition on some very important legal issues and points, relating to eradication of Corruption:-
1. Under the law of equality the Petitioner being admitted Tax Evasion Petitioner is fully entitled to get Amount of Reward plus interests for delay in payment against realization of Revenue on his Tax Evasion Petitioner, under the Reward Policy formulated by the CBDT.
2. Under the Law of Justice, the petitioner is fully entitled to get all information regarding each enquiry conducted by the Income Tax (Investigation) and Income Tax (Vigilance) authorities, on the basis of complaints lodged by the Petitioner.
3. In the larger Public Interests, the petitioner is fully entitled to get all information regarding each Survey or Enquiry conducted by the Income Tax (Investigation) and Income Tax (Vigilance) authorities.
4. Under the law of equity, Central Vigilance Commission, is responsible to issue direction upon the Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct investigations when petitioner can justify that the enquiry conducted by the Income Tax (Investigation) and Income Tax (Vigilance) authorities, was not genuine rather under collusion.
5. That under the law of equality and equity, disclosure of Information protected under the right of privacy, including Income Tax Returns and details attached with them, cannot be denied when petitioner has satisfied with the documentary evidences that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information outweighs the harm to the protected interests.
6. Working of Income Tax Department, under supervision and direction and control of the CBDT, is not in conformity with their duties, rather to protect black money of Big Tax Evader.
7. Working of CVC, as if it’s working is as Corruption Validation Commission.
8. CIC is not functioning fair in most of cases filed by me related to CBDT or IT Deptt.
9. Shri Rajiv Mathur, the present IC has passed orders in the strong biased manner and further ignoring that every complaint is right to know full details of the results of enquiry conducted on his complaint.
PARTIES to be in Writ Petition:-
CVC;
CBDT;
CIC;
Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation), Kolkata
Directorate of Income Tax (Vigilance), Delhi
Shri Rajiv Mathur, IC of CIC;
CIT-Kol-1 for self and also for other subordinates in IT Deptt., in Kolkata
Private Third Parties, if necessary.
Sir,
I want to know that How to get NGO Registration in UP and what documents required and what charges of their registration? In this regard your earlier action would be highly appreciated.
Thanking you,
( Harendra Kumar )
9891180222
does union govt. of india has any fundamental rights under constitution ?
Respected sir/madam,
i'm technical graduate applied for passport and it was issued.but i have criminal track record of a bailable offense which is pending in high court for quash and it is a cross complaint and soon will get quashed. initially when i applied for passport i heard from someone that the person applying for passport should not be convicted under any criminal offense and if so should furnish the details of the case. i applied through a broker because of which cannot see the conditions and after entering in to passport office on the appointment date i came to know that even pending criminal cases should not be there. if any cases are there, need to furnish the details of the case.but at the last leg i was unable to reveal the information. now i'm scared that i did a mistake of suppression of facts which was not intentional.what are the steps or measures i can take to come out of this situation. please suggest !!!! no problem till now but wanted to correct my mistake.
Article 4 of the constitution says state reorganization can not be construed as constitutional amendment. Article 371d.10 says, irrespective of any other section/article in the constitution, 371d stays in effect. these two are mutually contradictory. Can any learned lawyers enlighten us regarding this issue? I mean, which provision supersedes which? Can a law with simple majority in the house set aside a constitutional amendment?
what is the name of case in which there was a composition of constitutional bench of 28 judges. please reply
Dear Experts.
Please Elaborate the Term “Race” given in Article 15 of the Indian Constitution. What this term will include? Please give some example.
Reagards
Rachit Inani
Suprime court or high court confusion
I want to file PIL (Public Interest Litigation), in the matter of rights of Innovator and Researcher, on the legal ground of “under the Article 16(1) & Article 51A(h) in The Constitution Of India”.
But I am confusing, which is appropriate court for my case either Supreme Court or High Court, if you see there are two legal grounds of my case one is concern with Fundamental rights and another is Fundamental duty.
I also inform you that, this is the truth something going wrong with Innovator and Researcher of our India, but it’s going critical to find with reference to legal grounds.
The matter concerned with all Indian Innovator and Researcher, the directly beneficiary are Indian Innovator and Researcher not to the particular any state that’s the point, and indirectly beneficiary are whole India, in short the matter is not concern with particular any state of India.
In that of case which court is proper either SC or HC.
Confused because Article 51A(h) is not concern with Fundamental rights. Than can I applicable in SC because according to my basic understanding, SC deals with only for Fundamental rights of part 3 of constitution. This is the confusion about SC.
I confused about HC, because the power of HC applicable in only state level, and the matter of my case is concern with all Indian Innovator and Researcher. According to my basic understanding, I think HC not applicable to take any order at national level, that the confusion about HC.
There are two responds, both offices available in Delhi, one respondent is “PM” and another is “Department of Science and Technology”
For proper details of my petition kindly go with following web link,
http://www.change.org/petitions/president-of-india-save-grassroots-innovators-researcher-make-self-dependant-india-decrease-import
Please guide me; I am doing with pure mind and pure hand.