Devnandan Sharma
08 March 2014 at 20:26
I was a member of Bihar Public Service Commission. Proceedings in respect of reference under Article 317(1) is going on against me with three charges, the first of which is as follows:
"1. That the Chairman, Dr. Ram Singhasan Singh, and Members, Dr. Shiv Balak Chaudhary and Dr. Deonandan Sharma of the said Commission misused their office and indulged in corrupt practices while making recommendations for selection of candidates in the First Limited Competitive Examination as detailed in the Vigilance Report No. 19/2005."
The Vigilance Report No. 19/2005 is an FIR against 13 persons and contains about 90 pages togetherwith 150 pages annexed thereto.
My question is as to whether there is any example of a charge of misconduct in the History of Law similar to the above charge which has been approved by a Court of Law to be a specific and definite charge against a particular person. If so, kindly give reference thereof.
Neeraj Kumar Giri
07 March 2014 at 23:11
Dear Experts,
Please give your opinion upon a case given below :
A person fighting against illegal mining and mafia in a district, for this he had started fighting from many days he wrote many complain to concern department like Police, DM,BL & LRO etc, and brought many information through RTI, he accumulated many evidences like news paper cuttings which itself prove that the illegal mining is running in its optimum level.
But no punitive action had been taken by the concern department appointed by Govt.because a share from that business were distributed to them also.
At last he filed a PIL under Article 226 of The Constitution Of India, in which the Respondent where the delinquent officials and the mafia engaged in illegal excavation, the Judgement of Honorable Court was that, a direction was passed upon the concerned Police to take a step to stop the illegal jobs which were being conducted by the help of Govt. Officials.
My question is :
1) If the Judge has reason to believe that the Respondent were not performed their duties they are one who give shelter to the mafia to carrying the illegal business and causing harm to the national properties, then how the order were directed to them for stoppage of the illegal business, because the document produced before the Hon'rable Court is sufficient to prove that entire department is involved in the said business.
2)If after the order passed for stoppage of the same, regardless of the order illegal business is running in its original form.
3)What to do next if the police, DM or other Department is not following the order of Court.
4)Is there any other option to call for Justice.
Praveen Karader
07 March 2014 at 12:51
Hi All,
Please let me know what should I do if I receive wrong information under RTI?
I had asked the information to Panchayath Development Officer(PDO) regarding the houses sanctioned for the poor people under that Panchayath under various schemes and the eligibility criteria to allocate such houses for the last 4 yrs (2010-11 to 2013-14) since those houses were not allocated to the intended people rather they were allocated to the rich people. He has replied to that application after 60 days saying that there are no houses granted from the Govt. in these last 4 years period.
However, when I got the same information from the previous PDO uder RTI last year, he had sent me the list of beneficiaries under the various schemes (I have a copy of that).
So, it confirms that the given information is false. Kindly let me know how do I proceed with it.
gopal
07 March 2014 at 12:37
Dear Respected Experts
As per the RTI act 2(h) given here under
) "public authority" means any authority or body or institution of self-government established or
constituted—
(a) by or under the Constitution;
(b) by any other law made by Parliament;
(c) by any other law made by State Legislature;
(d) by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any—
(i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed;
(ii) non-Government organisation substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the
appropriate Government;
for Public Authority the RTI Act Gives this Definition.
According to this Definition whether Lower Court ie Munsiff Court to Apex Court ie Supreme Court comes under the definition of the Public Authority
HARiSH SHARMA
07 March 2014 at 08:11
without consent of parents we got married from arya samaj mandir,. Parents says to kill us,,
Can we move a application to district judge in utter pradesh for police protection against parents and other
mala
05 March 2014 at 21:10
Sir
Based on a complaint lodged with CBI a case was regd and trial simultaeneously the department initiated a inquiry based on the same complaint. Before conclusion of the trial court the departmental inquiry was concluded and findings of the charges mentioned in the complaint was proved on the basis of lacunae in the pleading of the delinquent. Then came the verdict of the court wherein it is observed that the complain so lodges is based on hearsay evidence and facts and incidents mentioned in the complaint s not admissible
1. What remedies are available as per law since the appellate authrity is not hearing the appeal and it is pending for the last 1 1/2 years
sam
04 March 2014 at 11:23
My birthplace is haryana. I have got an OBC certificate with non-creamy layer year 2008 from haryana. Now, i got married recently in delhi. now, i need fresh non-creamy layer certificate. therefore, i approached authorities in haryana for that. but they have refused saying that get it from delhi since u are married. and autjoritites in delhi are saying that since u already have an OBC certificate issued. we cannot issue another one. therefore, i should get ncl certificate from haryana, my place of origin. i am really frustrated. Experts, please gude me what should i do? i have found a few high court judgements that which have ordered the authorities of the state of origin to issue OBC certificate.
SIDDHARTHA PUNASH CHARAN
02 March 2014 at 11:13
sir
there was an case with me regarding test tube baby here it come
the lady gout employee husband has died in an accident and she had an baby through testtube way now there was an question regarding whether she can have an test tube baby and does she entitle to have an benfits such as maternity leave and other as per norms please give proper advice as soon as possible to lead this case
Sanjay Morankar
26 February 2014 at 10:36
Dear Sir,
Can we file a criminal case of murder or attempt of mass murder against responsible government servants and elected politicians for failure in making public life easy?
for Failure in planning and implementation?
Reason:- I have one car and 2 two wheelers but I decided to travel using local transport but I can see that it is worst. there is no planning and people are traveling in a vary bad and risky condition. Most of time they put their lives on risk. But they do not have any option because if they miss one bus they dont know when next bus will be ther. I have been waiting for 30 mnts to 1 hr for a bus.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Clarification of definition under lokpal act, 2013
Please advise me whether Central Vigilance Commission and Central Information Commission are covered within the definition under Section 2(c)(v) of Lokpal Act, 2013: as a body or Board or corporation or authority or company or society or autonomous body (by whatever name called) established or constituted under any Act of Parliament or wholly or partly financed by the Central Government or controlled by it?