Hi everyone,
.
Dear Sir/ Madam
Dept. of Posts (DOP) conducted an exam for the post of PA/SA, RMS, PASBCO & few other GROUP C posts. The exam was conducted circle wise. MAHARASHTRA & GOA is a separate circle. The Exam had two papers Paper 1 (written) & Paper 2 (Computer Test). DOP conducted exam in May 2014 for Paper 1 & those qualified for Paper 2, were asked to appear at paper 2 in Nov 2014. This paper 2 was just qualifying nature & merit is based on Paper 1 which was a written test.
After that the DOP declared final result on 08 Jan 2015. But due to discrepancies in Paper 2 (computer test) marks due to some operational errors, DOP removed the result next day from its website. DOP came out with accurate marks & new list in February 2015. This new list has no errors & is still there on DOP Maharashtra website.
In the meanwhile some candidates who were having their names in first list & failed to appear in updated list, approached the Nagpur Bench of high court. Due to this (and also due to political pressure) DOP has not yet released joining letters of selected candidates. Non-selected candidates have put the writ petition on the basis of ARTICLE 226 claiming there are more number of Outside Maharashtra students in the list & exam should be conducted again.[Stamp Number: WPST/3541/2015 Filing Date: 20/02/2015 Bench Nagpur Status: Pre admission]
I would like to know if anything can be done to get the joining. Can we get joining by giving undertaking to DOP or should we admit a counter-case. How much time can this process take?
Please I want above case writ petition filed in behalf of petitioner and
I filed an RTI in a govt department some time back asking for some information.
I received a reply that the information is not maintained in the manner asked for. i do not have problem with this.
i would now want to know in what manner are the files maintained in that departmnet? how are the records placed, etc in that department?
what should be my rti Query for this?
We had filed contempt against orders of single judge. The same was closed wdue to an undertaking given by the respondents. Now even the undertaking given by them is not being complied my query is should I file a fresh contempt or should I file an interlocutory application
After girl side witness has completed in court in matter of 498a case husband finds that case is running in wrong jurisdiction only becoz of girl false statement that last misbehave is made in x city of your jurisdiction while there is nothing done in x city all incidents relating to y city can he pray to dismiss the case for wrong jurisdiction?i know that he has to prove also about nothing in x city only belonging to y city.
I have NGO and gave new trustee detail and also old resign but i m not getting any revert from CCOffice since last 2 month and mediator also playing bribe role after that not able to understand profile of any govt. officer.
can anybody update me what is procure of this ?
visit.hitesh@gmail.com
A friend of mine, belongs to Hindu Cheramar community which is a SC. In an entrance exam she applied for reservation under SC. Her result was withheld for a dispute related to the reservation.
Though she was born as Hindu Cheramar, there is a conversion & reconversion history in her family. Her grandfather by birth belonged to Hindu Cheramar, who later on converted to Christianity under compulsion from his landlord to get Kudikidappu rights(property rights). Her father reconverted to Hinduism at the age of 32. She has in possession a Community acceptance certificate.
The question is whether she is eligible for reservation under SC?
Budget passed in kerala state assembly in the absence of speaker and deputy speaker, whether valid ?
sirs,
i have an important question to ask you all on the legal sanctity of a budget passed today in kerala state assembly.
today , finance minister km Mani was supposed to lay the budget on table. but, there was an accusation of bribery case against him. hence, the opposition has already said that they will not allow Mr. KM Mani to present the budget. As expected, today kerala assembly witnessed a lot of rotten scenes .Finance minister Km Mani and speaker were interrupted from entering to the house . but, finance minister came back on the second floor and read the budget from another MLA's chair and declared that the budget has been passed.
subsequently, the speaker, who was admittedly , not in the house, latter said that he has given permission to the finance minister to present the budget, in his absence.
secondly, chief minister also contented that finance minister has requested for the change of seat, from his regular seat to that of another MLA and he , in turn has forwarded the request to speaker and he has already allowed it also.
so, on these two points, the the budget is legally valid.
if the opposition prevents the finance minister and speaker from getting the budget passed, in such cases also, whether the procedures as laid down in legislative rules have to be strictly complied with ?
whether a slight deviation will make the budget invalid ?
if it is allowed, then every opposition will try this unscrupulous method in future .
SO, BREIFLY EXPLAIN THE PROCEDURE OF PRESENTING A BUDGET BY FINANCE MINISTER IN STATE ASSEMBLY ? AND , WHEN, MINOR DEVIATIONS IN THE PROCEDURES ARE ALLOWED ? HOW IT CAN BE PASSED, WHEN OPPOSITION PREVENTS THE MINISTER AND THE SPEAKER AT THE ENTRANCE ITSELF ?
ANY CASE LAWS ?
MUMTHAS ASHRAF