Anonymous
16 August 2010 at 12:49
Dear Experts
Kindly advise whether PF Deductions are applicable on LEAVE ENCASHMENTS to employees during the service period and at the time of full and final settlement.
regards
Anonymous
14 August 2010 at 17:52
Today we know that there is no value of one's word.
People think something else,say soemthing else,do some thing else.
In such a situation, what is the value of Oral proofs of people and what is the value of people giving witnesses in the courts ?
Anonymous
13 August 2010 at 10:29
In a specific relief suit involving two Government Departments A & B, Government Department B questioned / contested by filling a written Statement against a High court Order (High Court order already marked in the suit) stating that the existence of the main subject matter in the order of High court as immaginary and concoted.
The existence of the main subject matter was accepted by Government Department A in the Honble High Court, thus me the Plaintiff could get certain relief relating to that subject.
Since the Government Department A has already accepted the existence of the main matter in the HOn'ble High Court, It decided to become exparte and accordingly Set exparte in the present Specific Relief Suit.
Does the Written Statement of Government Department B become a solid ground for filing a Contempt of Court case in the High Court against that Government department as it amounts to questioning of the High Court Order.
Pleas advice.
Thanks in advance.
Sanju
12 August 2010 at 20:17
Respected Sir/Madam,
I'm a fresher in law college. Next month I have my first moot court competition. I have attached the problem. Kindly help me to analyse the issues of the problem. Reply as soon as possible.
Thank You
Parthasarathi Loganathan
12 August 2010 at 18:34
LAYMAN NEWS:
The Finance Minister, Mr Pranab Mukherjee, spurned the demand of certain Members of Parliament to disclose the names of corporates defaulting in loan repayment to public sector banks.
The disclosure of their names in a public forum (such as Parliament) will make the banking industry more sick, Mr Mukherjee told the Lok Sabha. He also highlighted the aspect of confidentiality clauses (in loan agreements) coming in the way of releasing the names of defaulters.
“If this (disclosing names) is done, a person will be declared insolvent even before the Court declares them (defaulters) as insolvent. And whatever possibility of recovering money from them will go. It will be depositors' money that will be lost (if we disclose)”, he said.
LAWMAN'S VIEWS:
It is a clear case of influencing or misleading the Judiciary to dictate terms by the Senior Minister who has no business to shield the Economic Offenders who are responsible for mounting NPA in the banking industry. It would also facililtate all the proclaimed defaulters to remain the dark under the shield of top bosses in the Government. It appears he must be more worried about the interests of Corporate NPA borrowers than that of the depositors who save their hard earned money in Public Sector Banks.
I want our experts to post their opinion on Minister's statement infringing the basic tenets of our Judicial Administration System
Anonymous
12 August 2010 at 12:29
Where one should complain for removing corrupt judge or MM, If one can prove that in a criminal case the corrupt judge /MM has passed a foul order intentionally ? Is it not important to weed out such thugs from judicial services ?
Any viable solution ?
Ashok Kumar Sharma
12 August 2010 at 11:52
Dear Sir,
I am of the opinion that the sc being at the top of Judiciary System, should take initiative to take cognizance of burning issues related to the mass as this mass can't be organised due to many constraints. Under these circumstances initiative taken by the sc shall not only give justice to the deprived but will also create general public in the the Indian Judiciary and the corners who are doing partial/malafied acts shall have to think in future and will not dare to repeat such acts minimising litigation. The recent example of discrimination is current wage revision in PSU Banks.
Please comment.
Anonymous
12 August 2010 at 09:42
Dear All,
WHY BOTH INDIA AND PAKISTAN CANNOT SORT OUT THEIR DIFFERENCES QUA KASHMIR THROUGHT INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
KINDLY SEND YOUR VIEWS AND OPINIONS
BEST REGARDS
pratik
12 August 2010 at 01:33
1) HOW IMPORTANT ROLE DOES WRIT HABEAS CORPUS PLAY IN ANY COURT? WHAT ARE ITS OBJECTIVES? HOW CAN ONE FILE A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN ANY COURT? ALSO WHICH COURT HAS THE JURISDICTION FORM THE WRIT HABEAS CORPUS ALSO HOW IT IS DIFFERENT FROM WRIT PETITION?
2) CAN ANBODY EXPLIN IN DETAIL WHEN, WHERE, WHY, HOW CAN FILE A WRIT PETITION & AS PER WHICH SECTION OR LAW. ALSO ADVANATGES TO FILE WRIT PETITION & TO FILE A ONLY A PETITION IN ANY MATTER BECAUSE I HAVE ASKED THIS QUESTION MANY TIMES BUT NO ONES WHAT'S TO ANSWER WHY I DONT KNOW. (I NEED FUL INFO ABOUT THE WRIT, PETITION & WRIT PETITION IN DETAIL PLS REPLY MY QUERY IT IS A HUMBALE REQUEST PLS .
THANKS A LOT
GODBLESS U ALL.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Decision of Single Bench
Whether a judgment passed by a single judge bench of High Court is binding on another single judge bench of the same High Court?