Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
15 October 2010 at 21:35
in panchayat election poling party colusion with a candidate,than poling party help to d candidate to vote -DEAD PERSONS,ABORD & GOVT.AMPOLIES ,
all can be proved.
counting has to come on 30th complaint has send to commision by redg.post .
how can stop counting of unfair poll?
however,every poll has their identity!
Vijay Pandey
15 October 2010 at 20:08
Dear sir
In whether a district bar association can refuse to give membership?
In our part the the local DBA is arbitrary stopped the membership to new advocates and refuse to give membership even they are giving it this year batch to after two years and also giving membership to a few even in this year they have only given 60 forms and provided membership to 40 and out of 2 them are controversial, i filed an rti before registrar of society seeking their registration and constitution but they replied that they have verified the records and found the DBA is not registered with them. this DBA is established during british period.
Whether the DBA has the capacity to refuse membership as it violated my rights to practice?
pls suggest me the remedy?
Anonymous
15 October 2010 at 10:14
Ld counsels,
In a RTI matter the state information commission had passed an order in February 2010.
If the RTI applicant prefers a appeal against the order before the HC what is the time limit to file a writ before HC.
Please clarify.
Anonymous
14 October 2010 at 13:43
Dear All,
I need immediate updation on the captioned matter which previously was pending adjudication before Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court which appointed Court Commissioner to prepare the list of the allottees and who were directed to file their affidavits. I have seen indiankanoon.com, the Punjab & Haryana High Court websites but of no avail.
Kindly provide your valuable inputs.
Thanking You in advance
Best Regards
Anonymous
shantanu dekhane
14 October 2010 at 13:28
Whether the question of Faith can be decided according to constitution? Whether law should recognise the faith please give case law also in support
Anonymous
14 October 2010 at 11:28
Dear Sir,
I Have taken admission in regular M.Tech ( CS ) in GCET Greater Noida on 4-12-2007 in academic year 2007-08. The event happened as follows
1.
First examination schedule of first semester declared from 13-08-08, but canceled by university due to not completion of admit card process.DELAY = 8 MONTHS
2.
Second examination schedule of first semester declared from 26-08-08, and examination conducted properly.
DELAY = 8 MONTHS
3.
Declaration of result just one day before first exam of first semester for batch 2008-09 in January 2009.
4.
18 May 2009 had meeting regarding second semester examination's, and took schedule for the same from UPTU Lucknow for commencing 7 June 2009.
5. 10-06-09 Starting examination of 2nd semesater .
DELAY = 12 MONTHS
6.
Declaration of Second semester result on 10 February 2010.
7.
Putting scrutiny of all subjects on 12 and, 27 February 2010 for 2 Subjects each day as total i have 4 subjects.
8.
Till date of 13 October 2010 university has not declared result of scrutiny.
I have consumed 34 months and from the date of admission 4th academic year in this course. Its duration is 24 months. I did not denied anywhere for any university or college activity. This all delay due to university irresponsible working and ignoring the student career. This is all when we have given many emails to university authorities but no reply and continuing same irresponsible working. My whole career and life is in great risk. I as not able to do regular jobs and still delay from university has put me in tremendous risk and tension.
I have only option of sucide or court.
I need suggestion from you what legal action i can take to save myself.I have attached uptu ordinance of M.Tech.
Regards.
Anonymous
13 October 2010 at 16:04
dear experts if u know the current political situation in karnataka wat ll happen?
is our governer has a power to adjourn the meeting?
Anonymous
13 October 2010 at 01:34
My wife has field restitution of conjugal right u/s 9 of H.M.Act against me.
The petitioner evidence has been closed and even respondent i.e. my evidence stage has also closed. The case is fixed for argument in Nov IInd week.
My Query:- I want to reopen my witness stage, as I want to produce one more witness in court.
PL. guide me the procedure to reopen my witness stage.
Santosh Maske
12 October 2010 at 19:34
respected experts
one mr. X is doing business of fright forwarding it meance he accept goods from small importer / exporter and farward this goods to cargo for transmission
he received goods from some one of HONGKONG to mumbai by flight and send it to AMRITSAR by domistic Air lines e.i. AIR INDIA but custom authority on instruction of air india sizesd goods by saying that it is not cleared goods there after custom authority canceled my AEP Lison by a latter and initiated procecution against me for BLack listing there after AIR INDIA farwarded letter to custom authority that sized goods by custom authority is by their (AIR INDIAS) misunderstanding.i was asking through our consultant but custom authority did not withdraw there cancelation and did not replied me or my consultant.
please help
thank you
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Linking all the rivers in India
Is there a legal remedy for linking all the rivers in India? and preventing the river water from going waste to the sea without using the water to irrigate the land to grow more food for the exploding population in India?