Anonymous
22 October 2010 at 13:03
I want to know that can we have a right to file a case against the "band" called by the various parties time to time for various issues.
Due to which poor people can not earn money for the livelyhood and the losses waht they suffer.
ami
22 October 2010 at 09:23
Hi,Good day
NOW OUR GOVT UNDER PRESSURE PLAN TO INSIST PG QUALIFICATION TO MIDDLE SCHOOL HEADMASTERS WHICH CADRE IS PROPOSED TO BE FUSED WITH LECTURERS WHOSE QUALIFICATION(PG DEGREE) IS TO BE PUT INTO THE RR TO BE AMENDED FOR WHICH THE PRINCIPLE OF AUDIALTRAM HAS BEEN FOLLOWED .BUT OUT OF 172 HEADMASTERS GrII 120 DONOT HAVE PG. WHAT TO DO?
BUT IN 2009 WHILE IMPLEMENTING 6TH PAY, THE LT.GOVERNOR PLEASED TO RELAX THE EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION I/R OF ALL EXISTING TEACHERS IN THEIR EXISTING PAY SCALES FROM THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR GRANTING THE REVISED PAY BAND/GRADE PAY ONLY. WILL THIS RELAXATION BE CLAIMED NOW TO PUT A SAVING CLAUSE IN THE PROPOSED RR SO THAT THE HMGrII MAY GET PROMOTION AS HMGrI? PLEASE HELP US.Regards
Suchitra. S
21 October 2010 at 15:18
Respected experts, I will be greatful if you can please help me in getting case laws regarding S.10(3)(h) of the Indian Passport Act?
Anonymous
20 October 2010 at 19:01
Dear Sir,
I Have taken admission in regular M.Tech ( CS ) in GCET Greater Noida on 4-12-2007 in academic year 2007-08. The event happened as follows
1.
First examination schedule of first semester declared from 13-08-08, but canceled by university due to not completion of admit card process.DELAY = 8 MONTHS
2.
Second examination schedule of first semester declared from 26-08-08, and examination conducted properly.
DELAY = 8 MONTHS
3.
Declaration of result just one day before first exam of first semester for batch 2008-09 in January 2009.
4.
18 May 2009 had meeting regarding second semester examination's, and took schedule for the same from UPTU Lucknow for commencing 7 June 2009.
5. 10-06-09 Starting examination of 2nd semesater .
DELAY = 12 MONTHS
6.
Declaration of Second semester result on 10 February 2010.
7.
Putting scrutiny of all subjects on 12 and, 27 February 2010 for 2 Subjects each day as total i have 4 subjects.
8.
Till date of 13 October 2010 university has not declared result of scrutiny.
I have consumed 34 months and from the date of admission 4th academic year in this course. Its duration is 24 months. I did not denied anywhere for any university or college activity. This all delay due to university irresponsible working and ignoring the student career. This is all when we have given many emails to university authorities but no reply and continuing same irresponsible working. My whole career and life is in great risk. I as not able to do regular jobs and still delay from university has put me in tremendous risk and tension.
I have only option of sucide or court.
I need suggestion from you what legal action i can take to save myself.I have attached uptu ordinance of M.Tech.
I want suggestion for that..
1. If I want to put compensation for my wasted years, career and tensions then how much i can put as amount as till now approximately 16 months has been wasted and dont have any hope to end the degree in next 6 month ?
2. Am I needed to present in every hearing on each date ?
3.How much amount and time is needed to complete the case till judgement ??
4. How should i approach and choose an advocate ?
5.If anybody can provide me some reference for UP High Court then kindly let me know ?
Regards.
AR
Jagdish Bagri
18 October 2010 at 15:15
A very senior Person of our Town has disired to Write the words ASANSOL SPECIAL POLICE IN HIS VEHICLES. He also has the audacity to Get the National Emblem painted in a shabby way in all his vehicles.
A Person Of the rank of IG has also commented that a Police Group/ Battalion can only be created by a state/Central Legistation.
Complaints to even the highest authority have yeilded no results.
What shoudl we do. This gentleman is also now treating His Asansol Special Police as an organisation and inducting members. These members are also Flashing Asansol Special Police in thier vehicles.
Anonymous
17 October 2010 at 20:21
Can I ask Govt. to supply me the info of properties, which do not belong to me anyhow ?
Like who is the allottee of a particular flat,who sold it to whom and when it was sold, when it was bought.
Please Guide me.
Thyagarajan
17 October 2010 at 15:23
In a case of mine, appearing in person, in a consumer forum, the President of the bench had set a date for me to explain how my petition should be allowed in open court. I had faced queries orally as well as in writing during the hearing. The president wanted me to file a precedent case that I had quoted. After a month of study of documents the forum ordered notice to be served to the respondent.
It happened that the opposite parity did not turn up before the forum and file any counter. The case was set ex-party and I was asked to file a proof affidavit on allegation made in the complaint. I complied. I gave my written as well as oral arguments. The case was adjourned for couple hearings for perusal of documents. It happened that the President’s term of office ended before the court staff gave clearance on perusal of documents but not the other two members. The new president took note of the report of the clearance on documents given by the court staff and set a date for orders.
But the new president sumoto reopened the case for clarification and on the date of hearing he asked about the precedent case quoted. I had advised him at the time of admission on a direction given by the then judge I filed the entire judgment of the precedent case but in poof affidavit I had given only copy of the relent pages. The case was set for orders.
What worries me is when based on the cognizance of deficiency of service noticed on the part of opposite party the court had ordered notice to be served can the new judge think the opposite? Also the other two members being present in the old bench are still there and on their concurrence notice was served will the new judge’s opinion matter when the majority opinion matters?
Anonymous
16 October 2010 at 20:30
Day after Tomorrow is the date of argumentation,can the opponent take an adjournment just because he is awaiting reply of RTI filed just seven days back,while he has already filed reply to the petition three months back.I filed the petition 6 month back.
Next time the opponent may say that he is awaiting reply of first appeal,next he may say he is awaiting reply of second appeal,next he may say that he has filed a fresh RTI.....
This way won't RTI become a ploy for getting adjournments,if court accept such pleas ?
Anonymous
16 October 2010 at 19:59
I live in Delhi DDA built flat.I am an owner through a chain of Power Of Attorneys starting from the allottee of this flat.
Someone filed a RTI to know,that who is the current owner of this flat as well as the name of all the previous owners of this flat.
Strangely the PIO sent some clerk to my residence to know all this info from me instead of searching the Govt. records.
I returned that clerk empty handed and asked him to come with some official letter describing who needs this info from me,what is the purpose and what is the guarantee that the info given by me would not be misused ?
Now several questions are in my mind:---
Is this the way of getting info for replying an RTI ?
Can a PIO/or any other Govt. Official approach/force Public for getting info for replying RTI?
Is not there some thing fishy in this whole matter ?
Did I do the right move by not giving that clerk the info demanded by him,would not I be harassed by some Govt. Official for not giving them this info ?
Please guide.....
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Reference under Article 317(1)
I have received three charges and directed to proceed for recording of evidences. The charges are as foolows:
1. That the Charman, Dr, Ram Singhasan Singh and Members, Dr. Shiv Balak Chaudhary and Dr. Deonandan Sharma of the said Commission misused their office and indulged in corrupt practices while making recommendations for selection of candidates in the first Limited Competitive Examination as detailed in the Vigilance Report No. 19/2005.
2. That the Chairman, Dr. Ram Singhasan Singh and Members, Dr. Shiv Balak Chaudhary and Dr. Deonandan Sharma of the said Commission had abused their official position and indulge in corrupt practice while making recommendations for appointment of Shri Arun Kumar Sinha as Stadium Manager of Moinul Haque Stadium, Patna, as detailed in vigilance Report No. 10/2006.
3. That the Chairman, Dr. Ram Singhasan Singh and Members, Dr. Shiv Balak Chaudhary and Dr. Deonandan Sharma of the said Commission have also committed a number of irregularities in sending recommendations for appointment of office of the Bihar Veterinary Services (Class-II) as detailed in F.I.R. in vigilance P.S. No. 20/2006, all of which are serious acts of misconduct, if established.
My query is:
Whether the three charges are charges as defined law;
Whether the details are not necessary to be attached with the said statements;
Whether the I have to undergo the inquiry without knowing the details of the charges;
Whether recording of evidences would be proper without the details of the charges having been specified.