Anonymous
21 February 2011 at 15:38
1) I have heard that by using ordinary legislative powers amendment are not laws but by using constitutional powers amendemnts are laws So the query is precise what do u mean by in depth depth ordinary legislative powers & constitutional powers . if possible with the help of a example. For more help refer artilce 13 of the indian cont of india 1949.
But pls explain me the difference & imp between them in details Pls.
2) What do u mean by special Judge shall try a the offence in a summary way ? Actually what do u mean by summary way . Whether ( special Judge shall try a the offence in a summary way )this sentence can be used under any civil , criminal, writ or SLP ?
Basically when ( special Judge shall try a the offence in a summary way ) is used.
Thanks In advance.
God Bless U All.
Anonymous
21 February 2011 at 15:22
1) With its grammatical variations and cognate expressions.
Query : What does it means "With its grammatical variations and cognate expressions." in any law where his words occurs.
Also the meaning of chartered high court as per Civil Procedure code, 1908.
2) THE PROVINCIAL INSOLVENCY ACT, 1920
ACT No. 5 OF 1920 [ 25th February, 1920.]
An Act to consolidate and amend the Law relating to Insolvency 1 as administered by Courts having jurisdiction outside the Presidency- towns 2.
WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to insolvency 1 as administered by Courts having jurisdiction outside the Presidency- towns 2;
THE PRESIDENCY- TOWNS INSOLVENCY ACT, 1909
ACT NO. 3 OF 1909 1 [ 12th March, 1909.]
An Act to amend the Law of Insolvency in the Presidency- Towns 2
WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the law relating to insolvency in the Presidency- towns 3;
Query :1) So what does the peramble says pls in detail also what do u mean by "Insolvency 1 as administered by Courts having jurisdiction outside the Presidency- towns 2." Meaning of 1 & 2 in the abovementioned statement.
Query : 2) So what does the peramble says pls in detail also what do u mean by "An Act to amend the Law of Insolvency in the Presidency- Towns 2
WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the law relating to insolvency in the Presidency- towns 3;" Meaning of 2 & 3 in the abovementioned statement.
Also why the peramble mentioned Presidency- towns 2 & Presidency- towns 3 pl tell me in detail because i am confused which should be used or should kept in mind.
Meaning of Presidency- towns & Presidency.
Which one is applicable when & to whom ?
Pls help me out.
Thanks In Advance.
God Bless U All.
pradyot kumar biswas
16 February 2011 at 17:16
In 2003 PSC received 40 applications for a single vacant post.In 2010 PSC received 35 applications for the same vacant post and out of which 16 were summarily rejected for not having essential qualification. There was only mention of essential qualfn. in the advt. and no other qualfn. like desirable or any other qualfn. was mentioned.
The undersigned appeared in interview in 2003 when 40 applications were received but in 2010 discarded by the PSC to appear in interview on the ground of a clause in information booklet in advt. The clause says that PSC can restrict the no. of applicants for interview when large no. of applications are received by PSC and it is not convenient or possible for PSC to call all applicants for interview. This restriction will be imposed on the basis of qualifn. or experience. This clause was in existence in the year 2003.
The undersigned have been denied his right in the year 2010 when no. of applications were 35 but enjoyed his right with less experience in the year 2003.
Can PSC take such arbitrary decision defining large no. of applications different in different year.
p. k. biswas
Anonymous
15 February 2011 at 13:08
There is a clause in the information booklet of Public Service Commission stating that PSC can restrict the no.of candidates for interview on the basis of qualification or experience if the no. of received applications is large and it is not possible or convenient for the PSC to call all applicants for interview.
For a certain post PSC received 40 applications in 2003 and the undersigned was called for interview. For the same post in 2010 PSC received 35 applications out of which 16 were rejected for not having essential qualification, 4 were rejected on the above mentioned clause of information booklet and 15 were interviewed. The undersigned is in group of 4. Having the higher experience than 2003 the undersigned was discarded from the interview in 2010. Is it fair and legally tenable?
Anonymous
14 February 2011 at 22:18
Respected law experts,
In case of accidental death postmortem/autopsy report to be given to the
deceased relative within how many days?does
it differ from state to state?
pl.suggest.
Regards
Anonymous
14 February 2011 at 19:29
Dear Experts please give your opinion as to what is the intention of Parliament behind this Section for conducting census of firearms?
Arms Act 1959, Section 42. Power of take census of firearms
(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, direct a census to be taken of all firearms in any area and empower any officer of Government to take such census.
(2) On the issue of any such notification all persons having in their possession any firearm in that area shall furnish to the officer concerned such information as he may require in relation thereto and shall produce before him such firearms if he so requires.
I have tried to think and find logical/reasonable reasons for the "need" for census of firearms, in my opinion there seem to be either of the two reasons, otherwise there does not seem to be any logical/reasonable reason for this section:
1) Parliament did not want the Licensing Authorities to maintain records of number of licenses issued for security of license holders. For example: In event of War if enemy forces enter the Indian territory, they will not be able to get to know details from records seized from the office of Licensing Authority about arms license holders in an area. In World War 2 it was a common practice for invading armies in Europe to first get hold of arms licensing registers, thereby getting name, address etc. of license holders and disarm them quickly.
2)Since the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is a fundamental right under Articles 19 and 21, Parliament expected that citizens in exercise of their Fundamental Rights, might be keeping firearms without licenses. Hence the "need" for census of firearms.
Otherwise if all the citizens are expected to keep "licensed" firearms only or if records of arms licenses issued are to be maintained by licensing authorities, the question for census of firearms does not arise.
p babu
14 February 2011 at 14:56
There is an irreconciable contradiction between two sections of the same ACT. What is the rule of interpretation in such a case Discuss:
pl give reference to us.
p babu
14 February 2011 at 14:51
"Y" got served a notice to 'Z'through unregistered way for eviction of his property. 'Z' received the same and kept quite. Explain the position of 'Y' to take against 'Z'.
pl give reference case law.
p babu
14 February 2011 at 14:17
"X" an editor of a newspaper published a statement of one M.L.A. in the course of business of the House in the morning session. In the evening session the statement is expunged by the 'SPEAKER' of a Legislative House. Whether the editor was guilty for such press statement or not ? Decide.
pl give reference and case law
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Reservation
Reserve category candidates who obtained the rank of general category in merit list have been placed in the general category's select list. Whether at the time of allocation of service they can be treated as reserve category?