Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:12
Hello everyone....
i wanted some brief information regarding the case STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V. DR. PRAFULLA K.DESAI (2003) 4 SCC 601.
And i also wanted that how can i relate the above mentioned case with Article 21. of the Constitution Of India.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:06
In writ petition if the respondent has mentioend that there was a complaint made to infomration commission but failed to mention that outcome of the enquiry conducted by the informaiton commission will that be held against the respondent in the appeal.
The writ petition was filed by public authority to quash the order of information commission however the respondent/ RTI applicant has also got a findings against the public authorities in another order passed prior to this impugned order of the information commission.
The writ petition was allowed without considering the earlier order and respondent prefers an appeal against this order.
Please clarify. Thanks
Anonymous
05 April 2011 at 22:48
Artilce 132 give the power to file a case in SC but if the HC don't give the certifaiacte than SLP should be manitain or Writ petition should be maintain in any case ? also why do we write SLP. & not any other words.
Which one more useful SLP or Writ petition in any cirumstances &in any case.
Anonymous
05 April 2011 at 20:34
The Supreme Court may reverse, modify or affirm the judgment-decree or order appealed against while exercising its appellate jurisdiction and not while exercising the discretionary jurisdiction disposing of petition for special leave to appeal. The doctrine of merger can therefore be applied to the former and not to the latter.
Query : what does the exact meaning of discretionary jurisdiction says because i am shocked that i the judment give by the SC by this discretionary jurisdiction than it cannot be applied in doctrine of merger ? pls tell whether i am right or wrong ? also how to know form the case law context that the judgment of the SC is form the discretionary jurisdiction ? pls
B.B.R.Goud.
05 April 2011 at 20:15
if an employee enters into agreement in the matter of pay scales, does he forego his fundamental rights under Art 13 of Constitution of India, 1950.
B.B.R.Goud.
05 April 2011 at 20:13
if the manegement, of any organisation registered under the registration of societies act in india, is not paying the salaries in time, who is the competent person in general?
Anonymous
05 April 2011 at 19:58
when court based its decision on basis of concession, the decision not a binding precedent AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 1273 "Kulwant Kaur v. Gurdial Singh Mann"
Query : what do u mean by on basis of concession or can anybody give me the context of the case law .
Anonymous
05 April 2011 at 19:43
I a fighting a case in (bombay high court)& a frined of my have give me a case law which was dismissed as it has been written in the last para of the judgment goes in no one's favour & the case is dismissed so i toke that case to my lawyer & he send that we cant take this case as a binding precedent or we cant reliey on his case as it has been dismissed & not in the favour of any one. my lawyer also told me that when any case is dismissed in any court in india it has been said that doctrine of precedent is not applicable to that case because the case is dismissed & not in the favour of any one of the party ? Doctrine of precdent is not applicable to the dismissed case ? is it right or wrong if right can we i have the case law on it which mentioned that dismissed case can be taken as a binding precedent.
thank.
krishnaprakash
05 April 2011 at 16:41
Sir,
I lost my ration card and applied for replacement card a year and half ago. whenever i walkin to the office they told me that new cards given for printing. with frustration i filed RTI to seek status on my application and got reply that forwarded to concern department. no response for more than six months and filed one more RTI attaching my old applicaion details to collector.. but till today no response for my RTI either for my application. i am thinking of file a case on this. is it legally possible to file a case on this issue? please gudie me on tihs.
Thanks,
Krishna
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Excise duty on Ayurvedic Product
Dear Sir
As per below links appears that as per supreme court no Excise duty applicable on Ayurvedic Medicines
1) parliamentoindia.nic.in
2) timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articles/ msid-1447233
3)www.business-standard.com/india/news/no-dutyayurvedic-medicine
Please reply me so that we can follow as per rules.
thanking you