LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Member (Account Deleted)   27 September 2011 at 23:17

Defence a1 land

Can a Defence A1 land be used to construct a religious structure funded by Private party / from donations by devotees?
To be more specific- In one of the Army Unit a vacant land was seen being utilised for a new structure adjacent to the unit Religious Regimental Institution.
Against my RTI application I was intimated that the structure is merely a modification to that nearby religious Institution , hence required no sanction approval of its plan , expenditures are being met from donations , constructions are not being done by any construction company etc etc.
What are the rule position?

Anonymous   27 September 2011 at 17:50

Public interest litigation

PLS. TREAT THIS AS WITHDRAWN

Smart Developer   26 September 2011 at 13:19

Police complaint...


Its very unfortunate to know the people who are reponsible to protect and safeguard the interest of people are not even willing to help or listen. People are of the belief police is to serve and protect the people from any misdeed and if this is the way they behave then the common man would have to take laws in their own hand.

My vehicle No GJCN-xxx met with an accident on last sunday at Piplod, Surat, 18th September 2011, and the person who was responsible had agreed to pay once i gave her an estimate. On Tuesday i gave her estimate through my security guard to which, she asked the owner to come, so i personally visited her house as she was staying next to my building. When I reached her home she was not there and her husband was so furious when he came to know and started blaming me, he said you file in the court. She came as her husband called her and accepted her blame but her husband was not agreeing on anything. Finally I told her that i will call her next day.

When I called she said half I need to pay and other other she would pay for which i said it was very unwise to say. I asked her I would not have allowed her to go that day and took her to police. She instantly hung up my phone and switched off her mobile.

I then approached Umra police station, and duty person gave me several reasons we will also do the negotiation and see if problem gets resolved and all. We are not getting anything to do this etc etc. But they were ready to file the case, as this was the first time for me to visit police station, I told them I will come again if I wish to file a complaint and left.

I asked my wife to speak if this can be sorted, so my wife also called her up and she was rude with her as well and again hung phone.

In the noon I approached Umra police station with the hope that they can of some help, I was shocked to see the response of the police men who are there to help, rather they said THEY CANT REGISTER THE COMPLAINT OR DO ANYTHING as its been a week old thing.

How do we do the panchnama?
What is the proof that accident happened and bills you showed is correct? you can show 50000 Rs bill etc
Why dont you resolve it yourself, why do we need our help?
Its not our job to get the money from others pocket.

I told them they dont have to do that, but atleast they can raise a complaint, to which neither of them agreed. I asked them if this is the correct practise to which all of them said YES.

One of them later asked me you come in the night shift and meet the person who you had met in the morning if he can file the case.

I am writing this email to you in the hope that some action would be taken.

SURESH GODBOLE   23 September 2011 at 20:33

Govt expressing opinion in supereme court with regard to crossing of laxman rekha

Dear Experts ,

I want to ask your opinion on this :-

(i) Is probe into 2G Scam conducted by CBI and ordered by the Govt is above Law .
The Lawmaking and whatever the Parliamentarians do in Parliament may be above Supereme Court jurisdiction but conducting of inquiry based on Criminal procedure by CBI or the Govt , in no way , can be construed as beyond the scrutiny of Courts.

The day it happens , the Govt will become DESPOTS.

(ii) Second , if a citizen of India would have said the same thing before Honble the Supereme Court (crossing of Laxman Rekha) while defending his case while arguing " NO NECESSITY OF FURTHER INVESTIGATION" , a Contempt notice would have been immediately issued on him .

Why the Govt of India is being given a FREE RUN ON THIS SUBJECT .

Can I as CITIZEN OF INDIA FILE A CONTEMPT AGAINST THE GOVT FOR EXPRESSING SUCH OPINION BEFORE THE COURT AS I AM ALSO A PARTY WHO HAS BEEN ROBBED OF AT LEAST A PORTION OF 1.76 LAKH Crores while distributing the liscences.

Pl express your opinion .

With regards ,

SURESH GODBOLE , 0-9929596546, JAIPUR

Swami Sadashiva Brahmendra Sar   23 September 2011 at 19:20

Reorganization of states

Is Parliament bound to accept the views of concerned States in a case of reorganization or change in the territories or States?

Swami Sadashiva Brahmendra Sar   23 September 2011 at 19:10

State reorganigzation

Is Parliament bound to refer the proposal of change in territory or reorganization of States to the concerned States?

Manoj Kumar   21 September 2011 at 19:37

Purpose of charitable trust

Is a Charitable Trust settled in India is authorised for promoting its religion.

mahendrakumar   21 September 2011 at 10:24

Noc for passport

is passport a fundamental right?

can the issue of passport denied?

if so on what grounds?

Can any employer in the country deny "NOC" for applying for a passport in case o9f an employee?

if the employer denies it,on what ground they can do so?

DEBABRATA MALLICK   19 September 2011 at 21:33

Service matters

Can the Disciplinary Authority act as the Appellate Authority ?

Arka Foundation   18 September 2011 at 20:18

Limit to seek info on 4(1)(b)

A RTI application on 4(1)(b)was filed to Public Authourity without specifing any period.

i.e no dates[particular period] were mentioned in applicaiton for the information asked.

Que'n:
- Can i expect the PIO's reply on 4(1)(b)for the current year 2011- 2012. As such, no dates given.

- It is mandatory to give specific date when we file an application U/s 4(1)(b).