Member (Account Deleted)
01 October 2011 at 17:57
In a answer to a starred question in the LOKSABHA Mr Anthoni, Hon'ble Defence Minister has said :
That Unit Run Canteens ( URCs) are run by the armed forces with non-public funds and hence not being audited either by Defence Audit Auth or by the CAG.
CAG in its recent observation during audit of Canteen Stores Departments has questioned the decision of the Defence Ministry and insisting its audit.
My question is what is the definition of PUBLIC FUNDS, non-public funds , Private funds as well as Regimental Funds in specific relation to :
Funds alloted to armed forces from the CFI directly.
Profits generated from sales of CSD stores through URCs run by regular military units as well as Non-Military est?
Rebates/ Pagri /revenues received from civil contractors who are allowed to run their commercial activities on the defence held govt premises/ Accomodations?
Revenues / profits accrued from sale of non-CSD goods through shops and enterprises, nurseries and gardening, by tilling farm lands etc etc?
Can all those mentioned above for which all officers of the armed forces are custodians as well as accountable could be outside the purview of the RTI Act 2005?
Anonymous
30 September 2011 at 23:32
Dear Sir,
A college Governing Council(deemed Univ.) based on a report of educationist,installs CCTV cameras in campus,class rooms,& connect to internet, to have "academic exllence & discipline.". A girl student was scolded by her parents, for chatting with boys & she is depressed.. Students' forum Association wants to file writ in HC, seeking Writ Mandamus to direct Govrning council of college to remove.
Can it be possible & on what grounds students forum be successful? Can writ stand & under what article they can take shelter or college can restrict privacy of students?
Experts,Please guide. I will be thankful.
gowtham
30 September 2011 at 17:04
according new trai rules the number of sms messages are limited to 100 per day, is it not violation of fundemental rules , its not a resonable restriction ,experts throw some light!!
Member (Account Deleted)
27 September 2011 at 23:17
Can a Defence A1 land be used to construct a religious structure funded by Private party / from donations by devotees?
To be more specific- In one of the Army Unit a vacant land was seen being utilised for a new structure adjacent to the unit Religious Regimental Institution.
Against my RTI application I was intimated that the structure is merely a modification to that nearby religious Institution , hence required no sanction approval of its plan , expenditures are being met from donations , constructions are not being done by any construction company etc etc.
What are the rule position?
Smart Developer
26 September 2011 at 13:19
Its very unfortunate to know the people who are reponsible to protect and safeguard the interest of people are not even willing to help or listen. People are of the belief police is to serve and protect the people from any misdeed and if this is the way they behave then the common man would have to take laws in their own hand.
My vehicle No GJCN-xxx met with an accident on last sunday at Piplod, Surat, 18th September 2011, and the person who was responsible had agreed to pay once i gave her an estimate. On Tuesday i gave her estimate through my security guard to which, she asked the owner to come, so i personally visited her house as she was staying next to my building. When I reached her home she was not there and her husband was so furious when he came to know and started blaming me, he said you file in the court. She came as her husband called her and accepted her blame but her husband was not agreeing on anything. Finally I told her that i will call her next day.
When I called she said half I need to pay and other other she would pay for which i said it was very unwise to say. I asked her I would not have allowed her to go that day and took her to police. She instantly hung up my phone and switched off her mobile.
I then approached Umra police station, and duty person gave me several reasons we will also do the negotiation and see if problem gets resolved and all. We are not getting anything to do this etc etc. But they were ready to file the case, as this was the first time for me to visit police station, I told them I will come again if I wish to file a complaint and left.
I asked my wife to speak if this can be sorted, so my wife also called her up and she was rude with her as well and again hung phone.
In the noon I approached Umra police station with the hope that they can of some help, I was shocked to see the response of the police men who are there to help, rather they said THEY CANT REGISTER THE COMPLAINT OR DO ANYTHING as its been a week old thing.
How do we do the panchnama?
What is the proof that accident happened and bills you showed is correct? you can show 50000 Rs bill etc
Why dont you resolve it yourself, why do we need our help?
Its not our job to get the money from others pocket.
I told them they dont have to do that, but atleast they can raise a complaint, to which neither of them agreed. I asked them if this is the correct practise to which all of them said YES.
One of them later asked me you come in the night shift and meet the person who you had met in the morning if he can file the case.
I am writing this email to you in the hope that some action would be taken.
SURESH GODBOLE
23 September 2011 at 20:33
Dear Experts ,
I want to ask your opinion on this :-
(i) Is probe into 2G Scam conducted by CBI and ordered by the Govt is above Law .
The Lawmaking and whatever the Parliamentarians do in Parliament may be above Supereme Court jurisdiction but conducting of inquiry based on Criminal procedure by CBI or the Govt , in no way , can be construed as beyond the scrutiny of Courts.
The day it happens , the Govt will become DESPOTS.
(ii) Second , if a citizen of India would have said the same thing before Honble the Supereme Court (crossing of Laxman Rekha) while defending his case while arguing " NO NECESSITY OF FURTHER INVESTIGATION" , a Contempt notice would have been immediately issued on him .
Why the Govt of India is being given a FREE RUN ON THIS SUBJECT .
Can I as CITIZEN OF INDIA FILE A CONTEMPT AGAINST THE GOVT FOR EXPRESSING SUCH OPINION BEFORE THE COURT AS I AM ALSO A PARTY WHO HAS BEEN ROBBED OF AT LEAST A PORTION OF 1.76 LAKH Crores while distributing the liscences.
Pl express your opinion .
With regards ,
SURESH GODBOLE , 0-9929596546, JAIPUR
Swami Sadashiva Brahmendra Sar
23 September 2011 at 19:20
Is Parliament bound to accept the views of concerned States in a case of reorganization or change in the territories or States?
Swami Sadashiva Brahmendra Sar
23 September 2011 at 19:10
Is Parliament bound to refer the proposal of change in territory or reorganization of States to the concerned States?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Judgement
Pl. make a discussion , whether damage suit can't be filed due to the corruption of President of India , Supreme Court of India, High Court of India The Govt.after exhausting all remedies including the Notice U/s 80 of C.P.C. A Judgment is being attached here with. It is to be noted here that a Suit for damages was instituted before the Civil Judge ( Senior Division) Sitapur for amount Rs. 11042 Lacs with an application Under Order 33 (2)C.P.C., which was rejected u/r 5 a & d without providing to correct my application in view of amendment of High Court Allahabad present just below the Rule . Appeal was filed being an appeal able order before the Hon'ble High Court with the ground that the application can not be rejected either u/r 5(a) or (d) of Order 33 of C.P.C., had been too rejected observing serious and frivolous allegation against the defendants observing Criminal Contempt but could not issue notice .Whether it not my right to recover the damages ? Full and final order may be get from the Allahabad High court website , Lucknow Bench.