Terry DCruz
24 July 2014 at 11:11
I have filed a writ petition by making Govt. of India and 6 officials as respondents. The affidavit is opposition is filed by none of the above officials but by some other official who is not a party to my case stating himself wrongly to be respondent no. 5 and filing the affidavit in opposition on behalf of other respondents as well.
can this be allowed. Any judgement on this point?
arunkumark
23 July 2014 at 23:13
M20 bond is already abolished in sept 2012.the committee formed in 2007 did not file M20 bond as they were not aware of it.That committee is dissolved after the scraping of M20 bond and new commitee is formed in oct 2012. what action can be taken against that old committee for not filing the M20 bond and where to file the complaint and what punishment/fine/penalty for them.
arunkumark
23 July 2014 at 23:05
A complaint is filed with Asst.registrar under 101 mcs act by Secretary against a defaulter member after passing the resolution by managing committee.since it is a quasi judicial procedure there is no need to appoint a lawyer and Secretary as a part of his duty appeared on behalf of the society .The defaulter member appointed a lawyer to plead his case.
My query is that secretary has intiated a action under 101 mcs act and taken approval/resolution of managing committee.Is it necesary to have mention of secretary's name in the resolution to appear on behalf of the society?As per the duties of Secretary it is clearly mentioned that to take action against defaulter members.please advise.
sonal
23 July 2014 at 21:55
Hi EXPERTS,
Hope you all are doing good. Please advice me
if one party wants to file summarty suit against other,is it necessary that 2nd party has acknowledge debt?
If there is written contract with signature which shows party giving consent,
now 2nd party not making payment and saying 1 st party is asking baseless money, on this can 1st party file summary suit?
2nd most imp question is if any sim card taken by minor, on name of minor,agreement has name of minor and party now not paying for bill raised, can we sue minor or is contract void?
Please experts guide
Thanks
Ananda
23 July 2014 at 14:53
hi,
We made sale agreement on e-stamp paper where we have explicitly mentioned to seller provide form 9 and 11 at the time registration(Karnataka)
But now he is refusing even he not ready to return the advance amount.
What are the steps I can take to get back my advance/site.
in the agreement we have mentioned that when we call him for registration he will come with all the documents required for registration and we have not mentioned any particular date about cancelation and registration.
and there is clause in the agreement if he doesn't turn for registration we can take legal action against seller.
site has been purchased for 13 lacks and we have made an agreement on 250Rs E-stamp paper, is it valid for filing case?
if I file a case should I need to pay the court fees?
what is the estimated court fees would be(in Karnataka)?
surjit singh
23 July 2014 at 13:56
Fact of the matter :
There are five brothers between them a partition was done mutually and a PANCHANAMA was prepared on plain paper having only the signature of the panchs. where one of the plot was divided between two brothers. One of the brothers sold the whole plot saying and stated that in one plot he has taken 1 katha less, but the Panhanama does not says anything about other plot.
Supose the Panhanama is not taken into consideration because it does not contain the signature of brother, then in that case is it right to say that all the five brother will have equal share in all the plots. Kindly note that all the plots are agriulture land.
Myself is the petitioner in the case and I bought the plot half share of one of the brother in that partiular plot. I bought the plot after ten years from one of the brother, and got mutation from Circle Officer and paying land revenue. All these doument have been produed before the Court as exhibits. Since this was a agriulture land the respondent conealed the fact that whole plot was purchased by him, it came to light only after the petitioner bought the half share in the plot according to the Panhanama and started to plough. The respondent has produed only the sale deed before court and no ther doument.
The brother who sold the whole plot has filed his WS where he has stated that he is entited to only half of the share as per Panhanama and this sale deed was prepared falsely by the respondent taking advantage of his being semi literate.
I want your expert advice and also citation judgement on this point. Kindly reply.
Ksreddyacs
23 July 2014 at 13:35
Dear Sir's, we are three members(one boy and two girls) to our mother and my mother was expired in the year 1993 at that time we are small children 6,4,2 years respectively. Then my father got second marriage and she has one daughter. We have 5 acres of land which was inherited property by my grand father now it is in the name of my father.
In this case what is the property rights between our four members.
Raj
23 July 2014 at 13:28
My brother wife has filed the Transfer petition for transfer of child custody case from Delhi to Haryana court. There are other cases pending there including 125 Crpc, DV and 498-A.The SCI has garnted stay and called for hearing..But due to some circumstances the hearing will not conducted and will fix for next week. The court master informed my brother that the SCI will allowed the application whether you contest or not But what you can do ask for mediation .If mediation allowed all cases of 498-A, 125 Crpc , DV will be finsihed..
My query is whether the SCI has the power to transfer all cases to mediation on hearing the Transfer petition 9Civil) for the Guardian ship Petition
GR Gupta
23 July 2014 at 12:08
Sir, an Association has been registered under the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 (Haryana Act No. 1 of 2012)in a residential colony in Gurgaon. It is mandatory for a resident of this colony to become member of this Association if he has got his Deed of Apartment done as per the Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, 1983. There are seven residents as Office bearers of this Association. Two office bearer of this Association do not fulfil this condition.
Can the registration of this Association under the above stated Act be challenged before the Registrar of Societies.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
rti cbse non aided private school
I am working as a clerk since 5 years in cbse school. I was terminated by management without any reason. I took stay from high court and join my duty again. After this mangement not gave me any salary incrament. And gave double to some their favour staff. I filed rti to deo for edu. Quallification and salary of all staff . deo make school principal cpio. The principal not gave any information to me
So now where and how i fill ist appeeal.
Is there is any way to get this infoermation.