MOTILAL JHALANI
14 September 2014 at 19:55
I had booked one Flat From Tata Housing Dev. Co. Ltd. in Boisar, in the Thane District of Maharashtra, which they were to handover the possession by July 2011. They actually delivered the Flat to me in Oct. 2013. I shifted to Kolkata from Mumbai in Aug. 2010 and presently in Kolkata. I paid to Tata Housing due installments V, VI, & VII, and other payments including final payment of the Flat from Kolkata. I would like to know the followings:-
1) Can I file a case before Consumer Forum at Kolkata or will have to file at Mumbai only? It may kindly be noted that I am a Senior Citizen of 70 years.
2) The address of the Regional Office of Tata Housing is at 249, Dadabhoy Naroiji Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001. I had and have received all the correspondences from this Office and all the payments were sent by me to them at this address. I want to know the Name & Address of the Consumer Forum having its Jurisdiction and contact No.?
3) Is There any specific Performa of Consumer Complaint at Mumbai or any general perform can be used?
Thiagarajan
14 September 2014 at 17:48
Good day Sir,
Thanks and best regards
Thiagarajan
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
14 September 2014 at 08:02
respected experts,
the title declaration suit has been instituted after 30 years of purchase(REGISTERED SALE DEED) of suit land by purchaser's legal heirs.purchaser's are not mutated the suit property during the life time of VENDOR which was continuing in the revenue records phahani/adangal since 30 years in favour of vendor's legal heirs and this legal heirs got pattadar pass book and title deeds and this property belongs to ancestral property governed by hindu mitakhara undivided family.
Q1.THIS SUIT IS MAINTAINABLE UNDER LAW OR WHICH IS HIT BY LIMITATION ACT SEC 27 ART 65.
Q2.PURCHASER'S LEGAL HEIRS HAVE ANY RIGHT ,TITLE AFTER 30 YEARS.
PLS GIVE ME YOUR VALUABLE SUGGESTION SIR.
THANK YOU SIR.
kavita
14 September 2014 at 04:43
Hello,
I wanted to ask If there is a clause in the contract granting jurisdiction to courts in Delhi and the price under the contract is payable in Mumbai, which court will have territorial jurisdiction.. DELHI or MUMBAI??
chandrabhanu
13 September 2014 at 23:37
One of the property related civil case is pending in karnataka high court. The case is running from past 25 years. Our opponent has forged the will document & get it registered in his name. Can we file the criminal case against him now after 25 years still the pendency of the case. If yes, please let me know in detail how I can file a criminal case against him. Please help me. My family is completely lost hope of getting back the property.
shabnam
13 September 2014 at 23:05
Hello sir,
I have file a DV case. When my chief was submitted i have simply submitted my statement alone havn't submitted any kind of evidence along with it. As if i am having all sort of evidence and my cross has been taken all over. So is there any chance for me to submit my evidence and whats is the procedure.
Please kindly suggest me as soon as possible.
Waiting for the reply.
Shaina Bajaj
13 September 2014 at 20:21
Sir I am working as a clerk in a public sector bank. Sometimes, Customers misbehave for no reason or falsely accuse for misbehavior and shout in hall without caring for dignity of the concerned staff. As customers are having a proper procedure to complain against bank staff, some of them use this pipeline for satisfying their ego. I want to ask what rights do bank staff have against these types of customer complaints. Do they have any such kind of right or do they have to just follow nowdays bank policy of Customer is always right and have to work at the stake of losing dignity and respect?
Triloknath l pandey Adv.
13 September 2014 at 17:43
by following due procedure under bombay stamp act i have impounded the mortgage deed and after making the payment of stamp duty got registered the mortgage deed... but after a lapse of time chief revenue authority of pune issued notice calling to pay deficit stamp duty... however i have paid as per the certificate issued by the collector of stamps... notice issued u/s- 53 A of Bombay stamp act... how to defend as they calculated stamp duty as per Art 6 instead of Art 40 of said act... pls guide immediately...
Balaji Bakthavathsal
13 September 2014 at 16:08
A civil suit was filed against 6 respondents in the District Munsif court with the plea to cancel all the fraudulent encumbrances created by them. The suit prolonged for 4 years and all the respondents were declared ex-parte to the suit since none up of them turned up for the hearing. When the judge was about to give the ex-parte judgment, the fourth respondent came up with an I.A. requesting to set aside the ex-parte order on some flimsy grounds but did not justify the delay in filing the set aside request. A counter was filed by me with the plea that the IA should be dismissed with exemplary cost as it was submitted belatedly and without any justification for the delay. Further, I pointed out the fraudulent actions of the person. The fraudulent person deliberately delayed the hearing adjourning it three or four times and finally the judge dismissed the I.A petition on the grounds that it was submitted belatedly.
The suit was posted for trail on another day. As one of the plaintiff of the suit, I went to the court to attend the trial. To my surprise and shock I was told that the trial is held up as the respondent who submitted the IA is approaching the High Court for stay.
Well, I request the learned lawyer to clarify the following doubts:
1) I have seen in most of the suits when the cost of the suit is asked for, in 99.99 % cases, the cost is not granted while an order is issued. Why it is so ? In the present case, the respondent is filing the IA to set aside ex-parte order without any valid reason and that too after a period of three years. Admitting the I.A itself is false through if I am correct. By filing such fraudulent I.A. he has wasted his opponent’s time, money and energy. Over and above, he had wasted the precious time of the court making mockery of the judicial system. Should n’t he be fined for this atleast ?
2) Can the court accede to the request of the petitioner/counsel to hold the proceedings of the suit as he/she intends to take up the matter to the High Court ? The reason for holding the proceeding while a petition submitted in the High Court is understandable. But in anticipation how the judge can stop the proceedings of the suit ?
3) It is agreed that every person has got the right to appeal. But can the individual be allowed blindly for appeal without any justification ? When the individual has not come forward with the facts or ground for his plea, how can he be allowed to appeal and that too after a lapse of three years ?
Thanks & Regards
Balaji
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Want the help of the experts .
hello experts
my quetion is that A is my grand father he has purchased the land and he divided into his 3 sons and his wife ,mean while he was dead without any will ,and after his dead my grandmother has gifited to his younger son ,in this sutation what to ,since she has not taken any consent of his other son can this gift be cancalled
because she had been given this property by her husband,and younger brother is not ready to divide it ,and now she is dead.what to do in this suation sir plz help me out