CHAUHANMA
02 November 2014 at 00:11
Respected Sir,
Can an advocate appoint another advocate (with his own signatures on Vakalatnama) on behalf of his client?
kunal bhardwaj
01 November 2014 at 23:49
what is defamation law and punishment in this law . what is the procedure for compensation claim
Member (Account Deleted)
01 November 2014 at 15:35
Hi,
One of my friend (Guarantor) had given guarantee for CC loan of someone (Mr. A) against mortgage of Business property to Co-operative bank.
Guarantor is salary earner.
Property is 80% of loan amount.
Now Mr. A is unable to replay that CC loan and property so mortgaged is insufficient to repay the laon & Mr. A has no other asset to pay full amount of loan.
My questions are below :
1- What assets of guarantors will be affected during the case, movable, immovable, salary, bank balances, cash?
2- Will bank be ready to settle the case at 80-90% recovery? (I dont know if banks do so)
Thank for reply.
Regards,
Rita
G.Nagi Reddy
01 November 2014 at 14:04
dear experts,
a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for seeking a relief permanent injunction apart from one interlocutory Application also filed under Order 39 rule 1&2 of CPC But interestingly the said suit and IA Petition was filed on 2011 whereas now the suit is coming for trail but the plaintiffs are stressed about the Injunction petition with out going for trail. here my question is whether the trail court take up that injunction petition even after framing of issues and commenced for trail.
there is any judgements for infavour of defendants side instead of taking injunctin petition commencing trail.
yogesh
01 November 2014 at 13:11
Sir,
In sevice matter case if the authority has cheated the public and ofer the post without selction test can criminal case be filed if there is smell of malfidenes and breach of trust with common pepole
The fact of the case is that I am dealing one case being consel of the case
In one Govt sector the authorites had offered the post to one candidate which was never advertised without holding selection test and the matter is still pending before the CAT for last 4 years, The CAT asked for the records but they misplaced it and tendered false affidavit before the court and I filed the 340 Crpc which is pending before the CAT nad now they say the records has ben traced but still have not been produced before the court
My query is that since the post was public post and authorites need to made an advertisement and formed the selection committeee aand result needs to be displayed but they offered the post purely by back door whether the prosvions of IPC donot attarct in this case as they have coommitted criminal conspiracy, cheating and fogery ?? if yes, whether the same can be filed before the Ld JMIC/MM simulatneously
Adv M.D.Azhar
01 November 2014 at 11:38
sir, weather application of interrogatories can be given before framing the issues to the suit? If the application is granted and questions have been delivered more then one set, or to the more then one defendant at once, then such questions are advisable for reply? court has not been specifically held that, defendant here by directed to reply the interrogatories. In the absence of the specific order, we are bound to reply? Moreover after passing the order, we can make the application to the court u.o.11,r.6 of the C.P.C.
VAKEELSAB
01 November 2014 at 00:05
Hi Every one..
I require your advice to understand partition proceedings. My query is
If A filed a suit against B for partition and it was dismissed by trail court. Subsequently it was decreed in 1st appeal and then confirmed by 2nd appeal in favour of A. The first appelet court passes preliminary decree specifying the share of the A alone. A files a Final decree petition in terms of the preliminary decree before Trail Court. During the pend ency of the final decree petition B approches 1st appelet court and files a petititon to amend the preliminary decree for specification of his share. This fact was not brought before the trail court and final decree is passed by the trail court passing final decree infavour of A. Now B files a fresh final decree petition. My question is whether passing of the final decree is correct? whether is it mandatory that A should inform the court that the decree is amended ( actually not ammended but missing shares are specified).
Please clarify
Regards
Rohan
Sagar Sharma
31 October 2014 at 22:51
I got a gpa from my mother and will ( registered) & relinquishment deed and gift deed (notarised) from my mother who taken her share before signed the documents. I done a sale deed in name of my self.
Just I want to know that this sale deed is legal in all aspects? And after my life, anyone can question such sale deed and share resides with my heirs & mother could demand anything in future?
Please reply soon
narindersagar
31 October 2014 at 22:04
sir,my father was totally illiterate(angutha chaap) property was mortgage with possession by my father for 35000/- in year of 1971 which was mortgage registered this is usufructry as mortgage property was attached money decree passed property put on auction mortgagee purchased the property by permission of the court himself for 82000/- all the orders passed the court without notice after that compromise was done in court in which mortgager have to give the possession the keys of demised property after getting the possession by the mortgagee 35000/ will be paid to the mortgager the confirmation of sale was confirmerd by the court on the basis of compromised lateron the comrpromised was back out warrant of possession was issued in execution all legal objection is dissmissed upto supermecourt without merrits only on long littigation of 35 year hitory and money decree converted in to mortgage decree in execution we tendred decreetal amount as per transfer of property act 60 with jugements of supermecourt of india on this act 1 air 1997 superme court 456 tited parichan mistry v/s acchibar mistry and air1963 sc 1041 prithi nath singh v/s suraj ahir but execution was under pressure of apex court orders no where said about redemption matter and executing said the mortgage is extinguished by money decree and compromise in tpt act compromised should be registered instrument as per law and decree should debar the mortgager but nothing such thing has happened the possession of property has taken by the mortgagee the suit redemtion is pending in court was filed in limitation of 30 years is that suit will be effected by the judgement of sc (I am on road lost house as well rozi roti i am seniour citizen lost every thing for money only and tell me extungishment of redemtion is right is extinguished or not
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Mis use of govt. facilities, pds (ration card), loans etc...
(1) My brother is well settled Govt. Employee earning more than 15000 INR per month.
(2) His wife enrolled herself for the Ration Card along with her mother (in her native village) and obtained ration card (Public Distribution System) and enjoying the facilities for more than 10 years.
(3) Also she enrolled her two sons too, where are they actually stay with my brother in City in Govt. Accommodation.
(4) I got Residence proof of my brother with his wife and Kids (through RTI) also I got the Ration Card details.
(5) By taking the advantage of BPL Ration Card, she also enjoying Bank Loan Facilities, Govt. Concessions....etc...
(6) Now I want to convey the same to Govt. officially, what is the best method / approach to be followed?
(7) In Dist Headquarters to whom I can submit a complaint?
(8) Is there any law that can be applied for cheating Govt Like this?
Please suggest me...