Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

roshan   06 November 2014 at 14:15

Torture, inhuman or degrading treatment

R/Sir,

I want help you regarding subjected matter.
Actually my neighbor are daily tocharing, degrading treatment and wrongly word use against my family. in this situation what we do. which case file against police station and court. plz suggest.

i am eagurly waiting for your reply.
my mail id is
gathibandhe.roshan@gmail.com
mo. no. : 9860596848

navin   06 November 2014 at 14:13

Delay of 900 days in review

dear sir,
I NEED A SUGGESTION....
i am the petitioner. The hon'ble high court passed a judgment order against me on 20.08.2011,the Appeal suit is favour to me. here my counsel is aged 87 years whenever i approached him he used to say the second appeals are pending,but his EX.clerk said me 18.11.2013 the appeals were allowed on 20.08.2011,i went to his office he is not in a position to reveal anything about the case, i was immediately filed the copy application on 19.11.2013 and the same was ready on 22.11.2013 and i engaged a new counsel and the counsel came to know about the filing of the cross objection which filed by my old counsel is not trace in the ledger, the high court categorically held in its judgment that the petitioner has not filed any appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court so for it against me now..and nearly 900days delay I WANT TO KNOW....THE COURT MAY BE CONDONED THE DELAY ARE NOT ? ANY POSSIBLE GROUNDS TO FILE A REVIEW PETITION NOW ? AND THE COURT MAY ALLOW ARE NOT?ANY SUGGESTION PLEASE ? ANY CASE LAWS AND CITATIONS FOR REF. THANKING YOU!!!!1

praveen   06 November 2014 at 14:09

Application to stay the proceedings in first appeal

If there are inter related matters pending in Second appeal( pedning in Highcourt) and first appeal, Can we file a applition to stop the proceedings in the first appeal till the Second appeal is disposed off?

If yes, Under what section we can do this?

Prasanth Kulambil   06 November 2014 at 12:57

Pecuniary jurisdiction of high court of u.p

Dear Sirs/Madams,

I would like to know that what is the pecuniary jurisdiction for moving a recovery of money suit before the Hon'ble high Court of U.P at Allahabad?

ranjan   06 November 2014 at 12:31

Partation suit

which is good idea, going for appeal or fresh file a case, if you are not the party to the case.The decree is against the person from whom i bought my property. I bought the property before the PS file and known only after the decree.

Abhisihikta   06 November 2014 at 07:17

Want to know about partition suit

when grand father did not willed any property and it was divided unequally by tahasildar can partition suit be done?

navin   05 November 2014 at 23:11

Delay of 900 days in review

dear sir,
I NEED A SUGGESTION....
i am the petitioner. The hon'ble high court passed a judgment order against me on 20.08.2011,the Appeal suit is favour to me. here my counsel is aged 87 years whenever i approached him he used to say the second appeals are pending,but his EX.clerk said me 18.11.2013 the appeals were allowed on 20.08.2011,i went to his office he is not in a position to reveal anything about the case, i was immediately filed the copy application on 19.11.2013 and the same was ready on 22.11.2013 and i engaged a new counsel and the counsel came to know about the filing of the cross objection which filed by my old counsel is not trace in the ledger, the high court categorically held in its judgment that the petitioner has not filed any appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court so for it against me now..and nearly 900days delay I WANT TO KNOW....THE COURT MAY BE CONDONED THE DELAY ARE NOT ? ANY POSSIBLE GROUNDS TO FILE A REVIEW PETITION NOW ? AND THE COURT MAY ALLOW ARE NOT?ANY SUGGESTION PLEASE ? ANY CASE LAWS FOR REF. THANKING YOU!!!!1

kaushik pandya   05 November 2014 at 21:36

How much time for judgement

I would like to know how much time does it take for judgement when a civil suit is at arguments stage

Anonymous   05 November 2014 at 20:47

Money lender not giving back original property document

My friend took loan of Rs.10000 from Mr.B in august 1998 by giving original site document and promissory note @ 2% interest for 6 months time. He paid interest only more than 10000. The site is in tamilnadu and both the parties are in karnataka and promissory note is in kannada language. The lender is demanding Rs.2 lakhs to return back the documents. Kindly advise what legal steps can be taken to get back documents?

Balaji Bakthavathsal   05 November 2014 at 17:06

Setting aside ex-parte order

Dear Learned Lawyers,
A civil suit was filed in the lower court on 29-09-2010. Since the respondents did not appear, they have been declared as ex-parte to the suit and an order to that effect was issued on 01.03.2011. After more than three years, while the ex-parte order is dated 01.03.2011, one of the respondent files an I.A, with a prayer to set aside the ex-parte order on 07.04.2014 and the court too admitted the petition. I filed a counter reply to the I.A. and ultimately the IA got dismissed is a different story. The respondent again applied for a revision petition which also got rejected by the lower court. Now, the respondent has filed a CRP in the Honourable High Court with a prayer to stall the proceeding at the lower court until his revision petition is heard. When I received the notice, I approached reputed lawyers and they fired me left and right asking me

i) Why an ex-parte decree was not obtained to which I could not answer as I am not the lawyer but only a client who depended on the lawyer.
ii) How the I.A. petition was allowed by the court while the respondent is coming up and opening the matter after a lapse of three years.
Now all that I want to know from you learned Advocates are :
a) Whether the court will pass the decree on the ex-parte order on its own automatically or the petitioner’s advocate should ask for it ?
b) Is it not the duty of the court to see the merit of the case before accepting the petition ?
c) Who is responsible for the miserable situation and what is the solution for it ?
d) In the same way of functioning of the lower court, the High Court also accepted the CRP petition and numbered without ensuring the merit of the case ?
e) Doesn’t this kind of functioning of the courts increase the number of pending cases which are not at all fit to be considered ?
Can you please come up with your valuable views/suggestions/solutions.

Thanks & Regards
Balaji