amogh
07 March 2015 at 12:16
My land is - Diverted land, farm land as well as empty (Banjar nothing grows on it). A private company is supplying power to MP- electricity board thru two transmission lines of 320Kv and 220 Kv ,and they have not given any compensation they show us collector order to allow them work. They are not giving us any paper saying the line is to be passed on our land. Request you to guide me how to take legal action and according to what Law of our constitution I can file for my compensation claim as In my town No lawyer has any knowledge about It.
Shajapur Madhya Pradesh
vishal
07 March 2015 at 11:40
Dear sir, a property purchased by mother in her name and her minor daughter name.much before benami transaction prohibition law 1988. thereafter she got major and got married in due course. later after 28 years she claimed her share. can she win against mother . property was purchased from mother own sources. thanx.
Vishal jain
07 March 2015 at 10:43
Brief..
girl stays with husband for only 7 days.
she went her home and did not come back.
Now her father is saying the girl is not willing to go back. and so she need divorce.
several attempts made by the boy to make her come back, but all in vain.
Query..
1. what is the procedure to return her stridhan back, so that after taking her stridhan she won't be able to claim again.
2. can divorce be filed court by mutual constent, as the sepration time is between couple is only one month.
shaik khaja moinuddin
06 March 2015 at 23:33
I am Dr.Moinuddin S/o Shaik Rahamatulla from Bellampalli Adilabad-Dist. I would like to have some information regarding the following matter and appropriate remedy through you sir.
That my father purchased land in sy.no5/33peddanapalli village of Kasipet Mandal Adilabad-Dist to an extent of ac3.20 cents and got the land registered in favor of my father.subsequently he submitted the registered documents before revenue authorities at Mandal office and got his name mutated in the revenue records. After some time, the vendor of the land & his neighbor submitted a petition before the MRO stating that there is a discrepancy with Survey. No. of both the lands which were assigned to them in the year 1955. After considering the petition the then MRO conducted inquiry and field inspection and issued rectification deed. The rectification deed admits that the discrepancy of the sy.nos was a mistake created by former patwari in the year 1955-61 it was created due to the similarity in the initials of the assignees named T. Ramulu. . (Sy.No 5/33 belongs to Talla Ramulu & Sy.No 5/19 belongs to Togaru Ramulu in short both were written as T. Ramulu). Later after the issue of proceedings by the then Tahsildar the Sy.No s were rectified and ever since then, my father got 5/19 as his land Sy.no in the Mandal revenue records. Whereas the sub-registrar office at Mancherial was not informed regarding this rectification & as a result even today the Survey. No in the registered sale deed continues to be 5/33 in the records of SRO Mancherial.
As per the present situation, I would like to get the Survey. No from 5/33 to 5/19 regularized in the SRO Mancherial as per the revenue records, therefore my humble request to you is that can i file a WP before honourable high court by making Tahsildar Kasipet & SRO Mancherial as party to the WP and seeking direction to the SRO Mancherial to honour the proceeding issued by the Tahsil office Kasipet. I am requesting for such prayer since the irregularity was committed in the Revenue Department by the former patwari. Neither my father nor the vendor of the land committed the mistake. So I don’t want to make any other person as the party to this suit apart from both the Tahsildar Kasipet and SRO Mancherial. If you can suggest me for getting such direction from the Honourbale High Court, please let me know through mail. If I need to file the case in lower court i.e. civil court to get the title& rectification of survey number in registered document , I need to make the either vendor or his legal heirs as party to the suit for rectification ; due to the hike in the price of the land since the time of purchase some 25 years back, the vendors legal heirs are not coming forward to do that. So kindly guide me if I can take direction from high court by making Tahsildar & Sub Registrar Mancherial (SRO )
Eagerly waiting for your reply.
Thanking you Sir,
With regards
salman khan
06 March 2015 at 21:39
whether the wife can give a divorce to her husband if her husband refused for the same or vice versa.
pls. help
pratyu
06 March 2015 at 13:43
sir
my aunt have been given 2.5 acres assigned agricultural land in ongole district of
andhrapradesh in 1975.her sister and her sisters husband created pattas in their
names in 2001and sold that land to others after her father expired.she wasnt aware
of it since she had been in another place and had not gone there for about 15 years.
she thought that her mother would been enjoying that land.she came to know about it
after her mother expired.
please inform how can she get that land back and how she can take action on them.
please inform measures which can be taken by her for getting faster result.what action will be taken on them for doing this fraud.pleaseinform.thankyou.
Bhartiya No. 1
06 March 2015 at 13:27
Sir
One person approached me for lease of my land. The oral agreement was that he is just taking my land for obtaining dealership of a reputed two wheeler company and if he gets, He will construct temporary showroom and carryout business for at most 3 yrs. After that he will shift it to his own land which is presently leased out to HP Gas. He had told me that after signing agreement he will do construction. But he has constructed showroom in my absence and now he is refusing to sign the agreement and telling me that he will stay here for at least 10yrs. His background is negative. Please suggest me how to safeguard my interest.
Thanking You,
shanmugman
05 March 2015 at 12:04
I have been given a property(Full not partial or divided) by mother through settlement deed. Myself and my brother are two sons to my mother.
Still the PATTA is in the name of my Mother for the property, i havent done name transfer of the PATTA in my name.
on the above scenario/situation still i think the property belongs to me. Can you please advice still the property is mine.
I have researched the same in the internet and found that the PATTA transfer needs to be done in my name to ensure that the property belongs to me. Can you please Advice
VARADARAJAN T R
05 March 2015 at 09:08
I need to change my date of birth in my passport which I applied for was on hold for Court Order (contradictory declaration order from court) to process further:
1. Change in DOB is more than 3 years;
2. Submitted to Passport authorities Birth Certificate issued by The Register of Births and Deaths from state governments (changed DOB);
3. Still Regional Passport asking for court order;
Can any one to guide me please
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Partition suit in high court of ap
20 acres of land at Puppalaguda village and another 22 acres of land was at Rudraram village right from 1938 on my grand father's(V.Rao) name purchased by his father one Chandrappa. V.Rao has one brother J.Rao.Their father Chandrappa died in 1943. V.Rao has sold 22 acres of land in 1952 for family needs. Another 20 acres land was existing on his name till his death in 1970. His brother, J.Rao got the above 20 acres land of Puppalaguda village, mutated in his name in 1974 after the deatch of V.Rao, declaring that his elder brother, V.Rao and his wife also died and he is issueless. Later when the daughters of V.Rao came to know filed a partition suit in Dist.court and wherein the Defendant, J.Rao adduced evidence with his own sister S.Amma that due to some reasons partition took place in 1942 when their father Chandrappa was alive and V.Rao was around 23 yrs old and defendant (J.Rao) was only 4 yrs old and the DW2 (S.Amma) was around 14 yrs old. Defendants informed the court that this partition took place in 1942 in front of defendants presence and also in presence of her husband, her maternal uncle and one neighbour Hakeem V.B. Only S.Amma was examined and at the time of evidence in dist. court in 1993, her husband and maternal uncle too died and only Hakeem V.B. was alive but he was not examined. Based on her only evidence, the lower court has decreed in their favour saying that mere entries in revenue records does not establish right ownership and according to DW1 (J.Rao) and DW2 S.Amma partition took place in 1942 and in some parts of Telangana it is not uncommon to continue the revenue records to continue and DW1 in his written statements and in examinations informed that the land he got mutated on to his name has fallen to his share and hence he got it mutated in his name. When he was questioned about the recitals - that his brother, V.Rao died and his wife died and he is issueless and he (J.Rao - DW1) is only the legal heir and therefore the land has to be mutated in his name. Strangely lower court observed that the DW1 is aware of the mistake and due to ignorance has used those recitals, had he knew properly he would have used proper recitals. Based on these assumptions the lower court has decreed in defendants favour. Appealed in HC of AP and now for final arguments. I request you to kindly guide in the matter with regard to the earlier judgements passed in such cases. A.Kumar, Hyderabad