Anand
14 April 2015 at 08:44
Dear Experts,
I am a Resident of a Bangalore apartment complex and fond of playing music which I enjoy with my family.
Every time I turn up the volume my neighbor (apartment below mine) complains that I am playing too loud and ask me to reduce volume because it is disturbing them, and they argue that peace of mind is their legal right.
I wanted to know if there is a law in Bangalore/Karnataka for Apartments which defines how loud sound (music/tv) can be played or is there a restriction on loud sound within an apartment.
A friend told me up to -20 decibels can be played but I could not find any legal documentation on the Internet for this.
regards
RPA
Jatin Biswakarma
13 April 2015 at 19:07
Dear Experts,
The facts of the situation are:
Husband was S.T. and died without will. The land in his name was inherited by his wife, who belongs to General Caste. The wife obtained "parcha" in her name.
Question 1: Whether the nature of the land is still tribal or not?
Question 2: Whether she needs to obtain District Magistrate's permission to sell the land to a non-tribal or not?
Request the learned experts to answer in the light of West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955.
stefen Ronald
12 April 2015 at 20:00
Sir,
I had a case in lokayukta in which an order was passed with a wrong assumption and on fake grounds. He also dismissed my amending petition stating that there is no amending is sought for I applied before the high court to quash the order and consider my amending petition. But the court dismissed saying the same excuse. How can I file appeal? what is the next step I can do as i have all evidences to prove that the court order is wrong.? can i file another appeal to any other bench or only appeal can be filed before divisional bench? please reply sir.
Azhakukumar
12 April 2015 at 14:32
Dear Experts
The property (the campus) is in a continuous building area, measures 100 x 18 feet, with a 4 feet wide conservancy lane on the south side from which access to the rear side owners are available. The plaintiff purchased the road side three storey building, about 50 years old, measuring about 38/37 (371/2 feet) x 18 feet = around 675 sqft. With a right to use the common passage. The defendant property is 28 x 18 feet abuts the plaintiff western wall, accessed from common passage and inherited by a gift deed. Both properties share a deed of exchange which is not in dispute and serve as parent document for the defendants.. With proper permission from Municipal Corporation, commenced demolition in October 2012. The neighbor unlawfully blocking demolition work and forcing plaintiff to sell the property for a song. Necessary police complaint was given. The High court direction was given. Still the plaintiff could not proceed work. The police authority cites pending civil case as a reason. .The High court appointed advocate commission (Both party paid & agreed) with the help of taluk office revenue officials clearly has given site plan as per records and as existing & boundaries are clearly marked.
Plaintiff: The Decree and judgment prayed is the defendants or their authorized persons should not interfere with the demolition and reconstruction of a three storey buldings; the plaintiff is to be compensated with the necessary expenses and any other relief that the court may feel fit. The application was filed as an emergency petition since one floor yet to be demolished and the building is in a state of collapse and danger to people, neighboring building and traffic(Mentioned in the plaint).
During arguments the defendants bring in a new claim that the wall between two is belonging to them and present a new fabricated schedule without survey number and boundaries.
The OS of Appellant filed in July 2013, the trial court appointed an advocate commission (Plaintiff paid and both agreed) and found that each wall is separate. After this, the second judge was transferred and the 3rd judge tenure is reining in. Further in the Title, the end wall is not mentioned as common wall (Pothuchuvar). After contesting one year, the defendants filed OS, filed interim application under Or7R11 and the trial court dismissed the petition filed under Or7R11 and Sec 12 TNCFSV act. The defendants went for Revision in the Hon’ble High Court which was also dismissed. So many somersaults were done by the defendants to drag the case..
Now, while waiting for an order, the plaintiff again filed civil revision petition in the Hon’ble High Court challenging the maintainability of the suit and praying for striking off the suit from the file of the trial court.
Governments are informed about the gravity of the situation and the Municipal Corporation has sent two letters to Police authority to provide Police protection as per law.
I am from petitioner’s side and not legal practitioner.
Such revision petition is maintainable and kindly renders us expert guidance.
senthil
12 April 2015 at 13:12
Dear experts,
whether this hindu succession act section 15 (2) (1) (a) is still applicable when
- hindu female's husband alive but they don't have any children.
- hindu female was live with his husband up to her age of 60
In this situation who is the legal heir of her inherited property. whether her husband or her father's legal heirs.
15. General rules of succession in the case of female Hindus
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1)-
(a) any property inherited by a female Hindu from her father or mother shall devolve, in the absence of any son or daughter of the deceased (including the children of any pre-deceased son or daughter) not upon the other heirs referred to in sub-section (1) in the order specified therein, but upon the heirs of the father; and
Member (Account Deleted)
12 April 2015 at 10:36
Sir/Madam,
High Court has delivered judgment against me to my civil (land partition) first appeal in one month earlier. I missed to submit one land evidence document in High Court earlier this case. Now like to produce the missed document in High Court. If I submit the missed document, case may be favour of me. Hence, I would expect your kind advise to my query.
1. May I submit the missed document in same High Court by file Second Appeal/Review or any other civil legal procedure?
Thanks.
Priya
kumar
11 April 2015 at 22:24
Hi
we have grand father property which is on the name of my father, my self, my brother name.
i have 2 sons and 1 daughter. i have some personal problems to register my share to wards my sons ( excluding daughter). as my property is ancetral my daughter has some share in it. i dont want to put my sons under legal issues in future. i want my daughter to release her share in this ancetral property. with out registring my property to my name and then my sons name from my will.
is there any direct way legally accepted to release the share in ancetral property.
j.s.coachman
11 April 2015 at 17:37
Dear Mr. Thangapandian,
I thank you for your reply.
Our property is slated for redevelopment since last 8 years.
The Agreements are just Notorized, not Registered.
Nowhere in the Agreements is it mentioned that the construction work will be over in a specific period. The builder is not getting permission to build a 22- storey building as the property is very close to The Mazagaon Dock Ltd., a Defence Establishment.
Recently somebody told us that Agreements are valid for a certain no. of years only, as per the Government's/Supreme Court's recent ruling. That's why the query.
We wish to know whether what are told is true.
Thanks,
J.S.Coachman
amitsingh
11 April 2015 at 10:04
Sir
I have been selected as assistant in ministry of defence Through SSC cgl exam. My joining is expected to come on last june 2015.
But i m seriously appearing in UPSC IAS exam this year. Which is scheduled pre in august and mains in december. So i want an extention of approx 6 months. I talked to many person already in defence, they told me u must have good reason for extention some other told u shud delay ur police verification so u will get extra time and some told me donot reply any offer letter they send it tow three times and this takes 6 months
I have two questions
1. How to get police verification delayed. For howmuch time (i mean 15 days /2 months/ 4 months howmuch) can it be dealyed???
2. What r strong reason to get an extention???
(one more point while answering the query please consider this point also that
I can leave job but can not join before last december)
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Dismissing civil suit
Dear sir,
Plaintiff has instituted civil suit in 1990.
Issues are yet not framed.
Plaintiff has stopped appearing in court and also not given his affidavit. his advocate only appearing for taking next dates.
Under what law this matter can be dismissed.
Plz give cititions, suggest any law point on this.