Sunny MP
18 January 2016 at 18:53
Supreme Court list dated 11-1-2016.
It is seen"AOR cod-wise defects but not refiled matters "
I don't understand what is the meaning of this?
Sunny
Ernakulam
Kerala
ketan_shriv
18 January 2016 at 17:17
I had purchased a house in Bhopal from Rai pick city bhopal. After purchasing house there are various seepage in my house and tiles are of different colours totally defective construction given by the builder.I was telling him about seepage before possession but he even don't talk to me rightly he told that he cant do anything i have to request to his workers project managers because they will repair it he will not guide his employees.i am totally harashed what can i do i don't want only consumer case if i can file criminal case against him i want to file criminal case for mental harashment also because i was requesting him for one year i have photographs of house full of seepage before possesion.Please guide me what can i do as a consumer and also how can i file criminal cas
Sunny MP
18 January 2016 at 17:04
My association won the case from the High Court .But Now Government filed appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court -bearing diary number.Court issued defect notification.
Does Government can convert this case as Special leave appeal against our Association
Sunny
Ernakulam
Kerala 682316
JAVED AFZAL
18 January 2016 at 09:06
A eviction order has been issued by Punjab Wakf Board U/s 54/55 against Ram Kumar President Arya School and file execution petion U/s 55(3) Before the Court of S.D.M. Then the other party file a suit in another name Arya School Education Trust through its president before the Hon’ble Tribunal and got stay order. On this order the court of SDM sine die close the proceeding till the final decision of the case.Now the case has beern decided infavour of wakf board and against Arya Education trust. Pls guide me in whose name Execution should file because of name difference
pranab majumdar
17 January 2016 at 22:52
a/c payee cheque received after signing the sale deeds of a flat.original documents of the flat should be handed over to the purchaser before realisation of cheque or not?
please advice.
Regards
Anonymous
17 January 2016 at 18:31
Why addressing someone as a Dalit is considerd to be defamation if constitution talks of equality in cast.According to our constitution there is no dicrimination on the basis of caste.On the other hand law punish a person of defamation if he addresses someone as a lower caste man.
Ankit
17 January 2016 at 13:53
I have got a situation of my dearest friend who just got married 1 month back & had gone out of India (to country where he is working on contract & to countries nearby), for honeymoon, with his dear wife. It is an arranged marriage. Except bride & groom, all the family members stay back in India.
Girl has not been understanding & has rather been stubborn on her way of leading life instead of being responsible after getting married, which is expected by bride as well as groom, to start building relation.
There were disputes raised between the parents of my friend & his wife, due to rituals which needs to be followed after marriage on first festivals for 1 year after married life of the children, in which bride's parents have to gift 4 Pair of Clothes, sweets & sindoor. The same were already well informed by groom's parents to bride's elderly before the marriage & were also reminded after marriage.
These disputes led to the fact that girl came back from mid honeymoon period leaving the husband, and directly went back to her parents, which was considered by bride & his family, as an immature decision by the young girl.
But then, soon it was then identified that bride's father & mother had been unnecessarily alleging my friend's family on phone, for dowry and mental torture, which was shocking. It has been clear now that the prime motto of bride's family is to dominate groom & groom family or threaten financial implications by filing divorce FIR.
Now since things have gone even more worse & have proven to be eyeopener, I would like to get advice on how I can help my friend save his financial impact in case of divorce, which in current situation seems unavoidable.
(1) Which precautions should he take to safegaurd his property?
(2) Which Legal Rights can be in his favour if he lodges FIR before bride's family files the same?
(3) Can he transfer all his property to his own parents without any sale consideration?
(4) I have read about Sec 14 of Marriage Act, which denies divorce before 6 months?
(5) Which all claims can be made by wife after marriage of 1 month as right on property?
(6) Does it always have impact only on husband financially as well as mentally & there are no rights for husband getting / seeking divorced?
Kindly address these queries..
Rafiq
17 January 2016 at 08:52
Respected Sir/Mam, what is the rule in SRA in case am having 2 shops on the same name. Am I eligible for 2 shops ? requesting you to share the rule or suggest the article number
Regards,
Rafiq
Rafiq
17 January 2016 at 08:48
Respected Sir/Mam, what is the rule in SRA in case am having 2 shops on the same name. Am I eligible for 2 shops ? requesting you to share the rule or suggest the article number
Regards,
Rafiq
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
advocate scribe
Respected experts,
Please clarify my doubt.
Can an advocate who prepared an unregistered will also signed as the scribe of the will under the heading 'prepared by' file caveat applications on behalf of the benificiary after the demise of the testator of the will against the other legal heirs of the testator?
And he also subsequently deposed evidence on the side of benificiary supporting the benificiary in a suit filed for partition of the will mentioned properties by the other legal heirs .
His evidence can be discarded since he filed the vakalath namas in favour of benificiary in the aboveasid caveat petitions anticipating litigations ?
Pls carify is the advocate scribe/ benificiary wittness in the suit for partition is an interested wittness?
What is the validity of his evidence?
He was already an advocate of the benificiary in the caveat petitions.
But later gave evidence in the suit supporting execution of the alleged will in the partition suit.
Thanks