B Singh
05 April 2016 at 11:45
I have filed one case before labour officer for reinstant. I also want to file case in civil court for recovery of damages. Can I file same as per law.
sandeep
05 April 2016 at 09:54
Respected Sir,
On 21st March 2016, i have communicated a civil case about suit property to your notice for suitable guidance. On this Shri. R.K. Nanda, Shri. Rajendra k goyal, and Shri. P. Venu who are the legal experts have given their legal advise to me and my mother(plaintiff) to oppose the appointment of "Advocate Commissioner" on the next date of hearing of our case.
Accordingly, on 04th April 2016, my mother appeared before the trail court of city civil court, Hyderabad when our case was called. Then my mother opposed the appointment of "Advocate Commissioner" stating that my mother did not make any such request/submission either to the Hon'ble court or to the advocate of my mother.
The Hon'ble court did not consider the request of my mother on the ground stating that the orders have already been passed for the appointment of "Advocate Commissioner", as such the Hon'ble judge further said that the orders for appointment of "Advocate Commissioner" could not be recalled.
Please clarify about the statutory provision in confirmity with Civil Procedure Code regarding the stand taken by the Hon'ble judge.
Thanking you,
Suraj Vishwakarma
04 April 2016 at 22:05
Request all,
I need a guidance related to Tutorial or Coaching classes which are running without any licence.
There are certain coaching classes in my area, which are running just on Gumasta (shops and establishment) licence basis, they are advertising like they have direct contact with the schools and they can clear all the papers if they took admission in there classes, and all if the student will not take admission so they can fail them.
I want to take some strict action against them but not getting where and to whom i complain even it will be grate help if someone says coaching classes are govern under which law.
please expert need a guidance on this issues.
desh deepak
04 April 2016 at 20:24
Vijay kumar singh v/s union of India
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 26 OF 2012
में माननीय न्यायलय ने vijay kumar singh के नए date of birth (may,10,1951)को मानने से इनकार क्यों कर दिया था?
विजय कुमार सिंह जी ने नए सबूत(proof) के तौर पर कौन से प्रमाण दिए थे?
Highschool marksheet certificate, highschool transfer certificate और माता पिता के द्वारा प्राइमरी स्कूल में अंकित date of birth में किसे अति महत्वपूर्ण सबूत माना जाएगा?
If there are any ruling or decision from Supreme court , please mention those.
Thanks
Uday Sawant
04 April 2016 at 18:24
Dear Sir,
My wife belongs to Maharashtra State and she belongs to SC category and having caste certificate of Maharashtra state. After marriage she came to Bhopal city of Madhya Pradesh and living with my family. I belongs to General Category. I have made domicile certificate of Madhya Pradesh and have entered her name as my wife in the domicile certificate.
The caste of my wife is also in reserve category of Scheduled Caste of Madhya Pradesh. Now I want to know, if the same caste of my wife is also in SC Category of my state, Is the certificate valid for Madhya Pradesh and can she enjoy the benefit in Madhya Pradesh after entering her name in MP domicile.
Please reply my query as soon as possible.
srinivas
04 April 2016 at 12:59
sir i had given a flat on leave license in pune .agreement was regd and even tenant information form was submitted at concerned police station as per laws of the land.
licensee suddenly passed away during a surgery and his wife is neither vacating the flat (eventhough she is not staying there) nor paying the license fee . we have not recd the license fee for past 5 months and sixmonth has started. deaceaseds elder bother is not ready to settel things as he says it her brother wife who has to take action.pl help
how to proceed further to get the vacant possesion of the flat and dues following the rules.
jagadish paranjape
03 April 2016 at 20:06
Civil procedure code was amended and provision for examination in chief by Affidavit was introduced.The idea was to save court's time.
However that purpose is not served if total evidence of all the witnesses of the party is not taken at one time. It is observed that parties improve the evidence in successive Affidavits filed on different dates.
It was further provided that cross Exam. be taken by Commissioner appointed by court,But that is not done(at least in labour /Industrial courts) Thus the whole purpose of amendment is lost and the matters drag on as before.
Instead of gainfully using the amended provisions,every one harps on paucity of judges.
VIPUL
03 April 2016 at 13:59
Stepdaughter is not entitled to inherit any share in her stepmother's self acquired property. any judgement sir
sohail
03 April 2016 at 10:57
Respecte Sir,
I am the petitioner in OS/36/2013 IA pending, at the senior civil judge at Shadnagar, for recovery of possession suite. And the property was not partition among the pattadars and hisadars, total Six Pattadars was there in the survey no and my five uncles gifted the 0.35 guntas land to my brother and he also become the pattadar and my brother died long back and know his legal heirs are trying to sell that suite land in which (recovery of possession suite case is pending).
Now I have the fear who ever purchase the property he will take the possession for stoping him I want to take injuction order or ad-interim injunction.
Whether I will get the injunction order or not, my brother didn’t get that property by family settlement just that was gifted land, by my uncles.
Kindly guide me what to do. For stoping the third party to take the possession of the suit land.
Regards
Khaja Masood Ali Siddiqui
Senior Citizen
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Surplus land case
There was a family settlement/partition between father and sons in 1953 which is listed in family bahi and sons are reflected as cultivator in the zamabandi on the same units of land which is divided among them in family partition and still the land was declared as surplus without giving any notice to sons in 1959 under Punjab Act. Only notice was given to land owner and all the three sons of him (petitioners) filed an objection against surplus order but collector neither pass any order on objection and nor do any hearing.
We are fighting since then in collector courts (FCR) and now the case is in High Court because Haryana Govt not considered our 1953 family settlement/partition.
My question :- Is a family settlement/partition which is listed in family bahi and reflect in zamabandi (in cultivator column not in the owner column) is validate by Haryana surplus Act or by the court at any time.
Moreover petitioner was adults when the land was declared surplus and no notice was given to them and no order was passed against their objection.