Dirgesh kumar sharma
16 April 2017 at 09:50
नमस्कार
राज्य शासन ने अधिसूचना जारी कर आवासीय कालोनी में विक्रय विलेख में स्टाम्प सुल्क से छूट प्रदान किया है। इस अधिसूचना के तहत विक्रय विलेख निष्पादित हुआ और सुल्क में छूट प्राप्त किया गया। रजिस्टर्ड होने के बाद कलेक्टर ऑफ़ स्टाम्प ने धारा 33 व् 40 बी भारतीय स्टाम्प के तहत आदेश जारी किया जिसमें छूट की पात्रता न होने से स्टाम्प वसूली का आदेश जारी किया गया। इस आदेश को धारा 47 क के तहत आयुक्त के न्यायलय में अपील की गयी जिसे आयुक्त ने अधिकार छेत्र में न होने से अपील अग्राह्य कर दिया। अब प्रश्न ये है कि आयुक्त के आदेश के विरुद्ध या कलेक्टर ऑफ़ स्टाम्प के आदेश के विरुद्ध रेवन्यू बोर्ड जाऊ । दूसरा सवाल अपील या रिवीजन करू।
Sanjeev
16 April 2017 at 03:38
Respected Experts,
Pls send Judgements on Sec 3 of Arbitration & Reconciliation Act 1996.
Regards
Sanjeev
NEHA
15 April 2017 at 15:51
Dear Sir,
During pendency of civil suit u/s 151 Cpc, the case was referred to Mediation. The Plaintiff was unaware of the fact. The Mediator in collusion with plaintiff lawyer and defendant lawyer submitted his report for successful resolution of dispute.
Real fact was plaintiff was unaware and some documents were got signed by his lawyer in good faith. Later on, both parties submitted resolution prayer. The Plaintiff is not agreeing on mediation.
My query is:
1) What can be done to note press the prayer submitted by plaintiff himself which he failed to understand in terms of twisted legal language.
2) Stop the passing of order by Court on the basis of resolution submitted unknowingly.
3) Further Plaintiff wished to raise objections on resolution submitted by Defendant?
Please guide on above issue. The matter is most urgent.
Santosh
15 April 2017 at 11:17
Has any GR passed to reguralise the illegal structures in Navi Mumbai as it was highlited in the news that all structure before 2015 shall be legalised
Santosh
15 April 2017 at 11:14
What is the process for taking the stay order on a civil matter and with in how many days stay is granted
Mohamed Ali
14 April 2017 at 23:05
Dear All,
A Muslim partition suit was decreed in 1980, with particular shares declared for plaintiffs and defedants, it had 2 types of properties town and revenue,Final decree proceedings were filed, for town properties a muncipal commisioner was appointed to divide it by metes and bound as per decree and the parties accepted the commisioner report and execution proceeding were completed and parties were put in possession of their share in 1993 and town properties were finally settled once for all and the Khata is also in joint names of heirs of decree holders, many parties sold the properties alloted to their share,but for the other part of decree with respect to revenue properties the FDP is still pending.
In case of one of the decree holder there was a dispute regarding sharing of town properties among the legal heirs of deceased ancestor, they filed an application the FDP court, but court refused to decide the application saying fdp court will not decide about share of decree holders heirs,
hence parties filed a separate suit for interse partition of legal heirs of deceased ancestor(decree holder) by including only town properties in schedule which have attained finality in 1993, as the other part of decree for revenue properties have not yet attained finality and the parties are yet to be put in possesion..
Does suit is bar by Order 2 rule cpc and
if in future plaintiffs have to file one more suit, after revenue properties were settled finally to divide them, will that suit will attract resjudicata.
Order 2 rule 2 CPC will not come in way of partition suit as parties are not intentionally leaving the revenue properties from plaint as they are not yet settled finally
Thanks and Regards
petra elizabeth chithra
14 April 2017 at 22:43
My father and mother lived separately from 1981 . My father died recently without a will. From his friends I have found his account numbers on various banks on Madurai city, tamilnadu, India. My mother is the nominee for all his accounts. All the passbook is under the custody of my dad's brother. How can my mother claim his finances. I have a brother who is an NRI
HADMATA
14 April 2017 at 21:37
My father gifted 50% property to my younger brother without permission me.
-we are three brothers
-property was parental
can i challenge or revoke this gift deed?
laxman rohit
14 April 2017 at 10:56
Respected experts
Provisions Rule 8 and rule 11 of order 33 seems to contradictory
Rule 8 give exemptions from paying court fee or fee for process while rule 11 says that if the suit dismissed because the summon for the defendant to appear has not been severed upon consequence of failure of plaintiff to pay the court fee or postal charges for such services.
My question is that if he is indigent person considered by court then why his suit dismissed under rule 11 clause (a) ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Tenants and amenities
Hello,
I want to know if it is legal to ask a tenant to pay extra for the clubhouse because he is a tenant. A flat when registered is accompanied along with the clubhouse. So, when a tenant is taking it on rent, he should be availing it as the owner has paid to the builder already. Also, if the maintenance is being paid for the flat, why should there be a question of tenant or owner. Is it not provoking racism?