Rajesh Joseph
28 January 2018 at 18:18
I have given some money to one of my friends one year back. He is now in Dubai. Whenever I ask money he give some excuses. Now he do not respond, he blocked me in whatsapp. I have transferred amount to his bank account and I have his confirmation on receiving money. Please let me know whether I can file a case in a police station or court? Please advice
Anonymous
28 January 2018 at 05:30
In Os,After Judgement dependent file IA (under limitation act) after 6months. IA Also dismissed. Now dependent file CRP in High Court. What happen in that CRP
Muralikrishna
27 January 2018 at 14:41
The brief facts of the compassionate grounds of appointment, which is temporarily stopped with the HC’s Injunction Order, is clearly discussed here under, and requested the forum experts to guide us with ur valuable suggestions :
After the death of the deceased employee, the daughter of the deceased ie., the petitioner approached the employer for compassionate appointment. Mean the time the illegitimate son entered for the same. And tampered the records and it was proved as tampered, in the court. The Court entitled only the death benefits as partially to the illegitimate son and to his mother, and issued the Succession Certificate only in favour of legally wedded wife and to her daughters.
Family Pension is granted to the favour of the petitioner’s mother (ie., legally wedded wife). All this issues clearly expressed to the employer and the petitioner further approached the employer. Then the employer issued a intimation letter to the Petitioner, and directed the petitioner to submit the Succession Certificate along with her original certificates like Study Certificates, NOCs etc., Petitioner handed over all her originals to the employer. Employer conducted the enquiry process also.
At that instance, the illegitimate son filed a WP in HC, seeking the compassionate appointment, and made the legally wedded wife and her daughters as co-respondents. Hence, the present petitioner also filed a WP in HC as she only the eligible for that appointment, and requested the HC to direct the employer not to appoint the illegitimate son (ie, who was not obtained the Succession). The HC issued an injunction order to stop the appointment, until the matter is proved. Now this issue is pending in HC since a decade.
Now and then the petitioner’s financial condition is in BPL. Years together she is awaiting for the employment. She failed to get any other employment also because she surrendered all her originals to the employer and She crossed about 45 years, still she is bachelor only hoping her employment.
The employer is simply saying ... the petition is in pending in the court, so we can’t do any thing at this instance. (under subjudice HRC also failed to render the justice in this issue).
Recently the illegitimate son, (who intentionally made disturbance in this employment issue) was expired (dead).
For appropriate, immediate relief what sort of procedure the petitioner (she) should follow ??
Hoping once again, experts may extend their valuable guidelines / suggestions in this concern.
MahendraKumar.H.Trivedi
27 January 2018 at 14:28
Sirs
Please help me and read even if you find repeated.
I am in a soup my lawyer , not accepting fees, not defending at crucial stage, not resigning officially, others not taking over as lawyer is very prominent and I am an outsider. With you advise I had the courage to go to court and get my case papers.
Your advice has been very helpful. As the status of case is changing I am seeking your advice in different thread,
My lawyer not resigning saying I will continue till you hire new lawyer.
Difficult to get the file also as he says I don't want fees.
It is a open and shut case but I need to give my evidence statement to court. Dates are moving fast at defendant stage. I am defendant. I need to act fast.
Some facts.
1. Suit Plot with possession with plaintiffs by virtue of transfer agreement of my late Poa. Suit was for title only under contract act. Possession with plaintiffs confirmed by plaintiffs filed in 2006.
2. Defendant,( me) sold the plot to third party actual possessor( fact hidden by plaintiffs) despite injunction in 2009.
Was not aware of injuction, CO defendant poa died in 2008.
3. Suit comes on board in 2013.
4. Plaintiffs file contempt application in 2015 and seek to amend plaint seeking cancelation of registration of 2009. Add possessors as new defendant and names them also contemner.
5.As contempt is time barred and as suit plot stands transferred since 2009.
I need to at least file my reply / evidence which lawyer is stymying.
Although repeated to the chagrin of some xperts, your advice has been very useful do far.
With Regards
MAHENDRAKUMAR H TRIVEDI
RAMAKRISHNA
26 January 2018 at 21:27
Hello everybody, my querry is that I own a house in our town which is located in a residential colony. But recently at the entrance of our colony some land in side the colony area one business man has opened a hardware shop( sanitary and heavy materials) as a result everyday heavy vehicles stop at the entrance of our colony which are blocking the entry of our vehicles( say cars and bikes and some times pedistrains have to wait) my doubt is how the municipality has given him permission to establish a shop which handles heavy materials in a residential area and whether such heavy vehicles are allowed as per law in to 50 feet road and unload material causing inconvenience to the normal public.?
Please let me find a solution so that our whole colony people will be helpful.
Thank you.
sujoy ghosh
26 January 2018 at 17:27
Dear Sir/Madam,
Happy republic day to you all. Well a PLA case is going on in the Kolkata high court since April, 2015 and there has been three hearing completed till may 2017. However I have changed my solicitor on June, 17 due to personal financial reasons. However I am not able to understand as to what is the present status of the case. My solicitor says, it will be listed for hearing soon however nothing is clear. Could you all suggest me as to which department in the high court should I approach to know exactly what is the status of the case and where it is actually lying and why it is not getting listed for the last 9 months.
Warm Regards,
Sujoy Ghosh
Balaji Bakthavathsal
26 January 2018 at 12:46
Dear Learned Lawyers,
A property was partitioned in the year 1959 by the absolute owner of the property into two parts and the legal heirs are living over there peacefully in their respective portions partitioned. While so, in the year 2010, a fraudulent person files a false partition suit in the lower court without establishing any relationship to the family or property or submitting any documentary evidences in support of the claim for partition. Now, the trial is taking place. The plaintiff has been cross examined. However, the plaintiff is delaying in producing the witness. So far, two witnesses have been cross examined which took almost 3 months as the hearing had to be adjourned since the plaintiff was going on seeking adjournment by producing false medical certificate of witnesses in the court, thus harassing the genuine legal heirs with the clear objective of grabbing money from the genuine legal heirs.
The advocate of the plaintiff is a black sheep amongst the noble profession. He had violated the basic ethics of the Advocates Act 1961 which states that No Advocate can act upon simply on the verbal instructions of the client. Further, as an advocate, he should be aware that there cannot be a second partition when already a partition has been effected on the property. It is obvious that the advocate is not following the ethics of the profession and I want to send him a legal notice before I file a complaint on him. At this stage of my suit, can I send legal notice to the advocate or does it amount to threatening of advocate ? Please advice me.
Thanks & Regards
Balaji
Bhargav
26 January 2018 at 07:44
I don't know what is procedure I have to follow, if I want to marry foreigner. To get no objection certificate from Indian Embassy.
Will anyone guide me?
Anonymous
25 January 2018 at 11:06
My property is 5120 square yards where 1 acre mv is 8lakhs hence the court fees is applicable on one half of the value so it amounts to 423140 now what % of the value should be paid as the court fees
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Land dispute
Information: As per initial survey revenue record(1958),survey no:353/1 is of 4 acres owned by 3 members .
survey no: 353/2 is of 8 Acres owned by 6 members (1.Mr.Ram, 2. Mr.B, 3.Mr.Dasaradh, 4.Mr.D, 5.Mr.E, 6.Mr.F) but each person share is not mentioned in that record.
then, Re-survey done in 1967. In between 1958 to 1967 there is no survey record.
As per Re-survey record(1967),survey no:353/1 is sub divided into 4 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/1,353/2,353/3,353/4) survey no:353/2 is sub divided into 8 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/5,353/6,353/7,353/8,353/9,353/10,353/11,353/12).
it is clearly mentioned that S.No 353/10 is owned by Mr.Putra son of Mr. Lakshman in re-survey revenue record(1967).
Case: Mr.Dasaradh has two sons Mr.Ram and Mr.Lakshman. Mr.Ram has 3 sons, namely Mr.ramesh, Mr.suresh, Mr. Naresh. Mr.Lakshman has 1 son ,namely Mr.Putra. In 1974, Mr.Ravana bought 1 acre of land from Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram. in that sale deed it is mentioned that out of 8 acres in s.no 353/2, 1 acre of land sold by Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram to Mr.Ravana. there is no specific detail about the 1 acre survey number in that sale deed.
S.no: 353/10 is mutated into the name of Mr.Putra's wife and it is in the enjoyment of her. due to old age of Mr.putra's wife , she left the village and staying with her children in city. by taking this advantage Mr.Ravana son is trying to occupy the land of Mr.Putra's wife by showing the sale deed mentioned above. now, Mr.putra's wife went to the court , and got the interim injuction order against Mr.Ravana's son. Mr.Ravana's son submitted sale deed in the court and claiming S.No 353/10 because of no clarity about 1 acre land survey number purchased by Mr.Ravana.
Will Ravana's son get succeded in this case?