Anonymous
23 April 2018 at 20:17
Hello team/advocates I need your suggestion on my below request. I have a personal loan from HDFC Bank. I have paid 26 instalments with out any break. In my complete history of loans starts from 2004 onwards I am a prompt payer because I am a software employee. Now due to my health issues I have left my job. I don't want to go for software job because of my health issues. I don't want to be bankrupt. I have some money so I can go for settlement also to close the loan. So please suggest me with options available to me. Thanks Raj
Abhishek
23 April 2018 at 18:47
Sir my father has a land which is inherited from my grandfather , 4 generations old and house in which was constructed by my father and uncle together . They have divided their farm land already 7yrs ago ,1) so question is whether it is my father's self acquired property or ancestral property & 2)we are 3 brother's ,I am the youngest and my parents live with me because my brother's are not willing to share responsibility. So whether my father can write me all the property or 50% of it if he wants as my brother's are threatening to take legal action considering it as ancestral property .3)There is a commercial land also in which he wants to give me the total front side .So whether it is possible if he wants to make a registered will . Can my brother's dispute his will ?
Anonymous
23 April 2018 at 15:55
We are a firm having suit for money against a Gurgaon based company. At the time of filing written reply (18 years back) and at Cross examination, they did not file Board Resolution. My new lawyer raised the point in additional Issues, to which the judge agreed and asked the respondent to submit these resolutions. They are fabricating the same in previous date. Can they produce these at this stage. If, no under which section, we can counter them. Any other point to our favour ?.
Thanking you very much & with Best Regards.
Anonymous
22 April 2018 at 18:57
The Plaintiff have filed a suit for (O.S.No.381/1969) Specific performance of the above agreement before the Vth Additional Judge,City Civil Court, Hyderabad parties have entered into a compromise (1st compromise) and wherein, the Respondents herein have offered to give 20 acres and 39 guntas to the Appellant/plaintiff.whenthe Respondents have failed to honour their commitment as per theabove 1 st compromise decree, the DHR/Plaintiff filed the presentE.P.No. 58/1984 before the executing court for execution.In this E.P. also, again both the parties have entered into another compromise and as per the 2 nd compromise, the DHR/Plaintiff was allotted 12 acres, after foregoing 8 acres 39 guntas.
21-02-1985(2nd Compromise decree) DHR/Plaintiff was allotted 12 acres, and physical possision has been given JDR..
30-06-92.(MRO file No.C/7/1992) After compromise decree, DHR/Plaintiff, instead of approaching the executing court, for registration of the sale deed, Basing on the said compromise decree,the MROafter collecting the Stamp duty and registration fee, with the consultation of the concerned Subregistrar,has issued a certificate
25-09-1993 After issuing the above certificate, the petitioners/Defendants have preferred the present appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Authority claiming that the MRO has notgiven any notice before issuing the said certificate and also the MRO has no jurisdiction to entertain the said case.The RDO opinioned that since it is a decree passed by a civil court and that the MRO has rightly passed the said order and hence there is no need to middle with the orders of the lower court and accordingly the appeal is dismissed.
04-12-2000 As against the orders of RDO, the Revision Petitioners/Defendants have preferred the present Revision. After due enquiry,the Joint Collector has dismissed the Revision and confirmed the orders passed by the below revisional authorities. of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattdar Pase book act.
15-10-2001. As against the said orders of joint Collector, the Revision Petitioners/defendants have filed a Writ Petition before the High Court. The Hon’ble High Court has confirmed the orders of
below authorities and dismissed the Writ Petition.
07-02-2005 As against the said order, the Revision Petitioners preferred this Writ Appeal before the Division Bench. In this, the Division Bench has quashed all the orders passed below authorities and also set aside the orders of the High Court, Single Judge. DB said that compromise decree is not valid document for section 5-a of act.
SLP NO. 10907/2005. As against the said orders, the DHR/Plaintiffpreferred this SLP and the SLP is Dismissed on 13/10/2015
Q1. Now i have approached the lower court and file to Open E.P.No. 58/1984 and execute the 2nd compromise decree
Q2. Does the article 136 of limitation act any effect on my case as i am fighting legal battle from MRO TO SUPREME COURT.? does the time spent from MRO to SUPRME COURT IS EXCLUDED?
Q3. What about the limitation of the 2nd compromise decree. does any section of limitation act help me out in this matter.?
Mohamed farook
22 April 2018 at 16:15
How much stamp duty to be paid for the moving asset value and goodwill value forRs 8470000 in tamilnadu for the registering the deed at the registrar of firm.Is any time limit to pay.Is the retired partner has to pay.The retirement deed was recorded on 20.12.2016 at the office .please you experts answer ,if it is recorded in 100 rs stamp paper , is it valid.
Anonymous
22 April 2018 at 06:50
My maternal great grand father has purchased 11 acre 34 guntas out of 12 acres of revenue land by way of sale deed in year 1938 from a person.The documents RTC have not been mutated to the name of vendee. Using this as advantage several strange persons have created sale deeds . The legal heirs of original vendor have undergone compromise decree with stranger to mutate the RTC without to our knowledge . My brother has filed complaints to Revenue authority's . They killef my brothet who had the knowledge court matters.
How to cancel the fradulent decree obtained by collusion of legal heirs of vendors and said strangers.
please provide sample format to cancel fradulent compromise decrree obtained in 2007. we are having certified copy of sale deed of 1938.. our great grand father the vendee has not sold to any strangers who created sale deeds
mohamood khan
21 April 2018 at 21:32
A person who is due to pay some amount, promises on 28 Feb 2000 to pay the due amount by 31 Mar 2001. What is that last date on which a recovery suit is to be filed if the payments are no made till 31 Mar 2001?
mohamood khan
21 April 2018 at 21:17
If the creditor promises on 28 Feb 2000 to pay the due amount by 31 Mar 2001 then what is the last date on which we can file a case for recovery in civil court?
Mohamed farook
21 April 2018 at 16:37
One of a partner retired from the registered partnership firm by receiving his goodwill amount and moving asset mentioned value of rs8470000 by retirement agreement of 100 rupees stamp paper in tamilnadu.The agreement was recorded in firm of registrar.Now some of registration official say that if the retirement agreement is audited 3 percent plus fine will be imposed on that otherwise it may not be evidenced in court.please advise
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Is information received under RTI act admissible in evidence
I raised a specific query under RTI ACT seeking answer in affirmative or negative.
The reply received from information officer was vague.
I approached appellate authority.
A date for hearing was fixed.
Appellate authority ordered information officer to reply in specific.
The information officer obliged and supplied the information in very specific.
Now I want to use the same as evidence in suit filed as it would expose the opposite party's false allegations / claims.
Can this information, reply to specific issue, be used as a primary evidence before the court?
Can experts please help me with supreme court orders / ruling / decision notice ?