Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   08 November 2009 at 19:18

Validity of compromise decree after 12 years.

DHR/plaintiff and JDRs/Defendants filed a compromise petition in lower court. As per this compromise the JDRs are agreed to give some land to DHR and accordingly, the JDRS had handed over the physical possession of the land to the DHR and the same was recorded in the said compromise decree. And it is further recorded in the said compromise decree that “in case the JDRS fails to register the Sale Deed in favour of the DHR, the DHR at liberty to get the same executed through this court” the compromise was recorded in year 1990. But this compromise decree was not executed till today.

1. As the decree is time barred. who will be the owner of this land DHR OR JDRS.
2. Can DHR clam this property by any other means.


NOTE : Law of limitation only bars remedy, but does not extinguish the right.

what is meaning of above?

Anonymous   08 November 2009 at 13:31

Mal administration and conspiracy gaiant the bona fide appli

Dear Sir,

I applied for Leases and mineral concession before State Govt. Following first in time principal u/s 11(2) of MMDR Act 1957, I have established my claim. Now State Govt. head and its IAS officers are playing havoc snatching such rights from me declining me on false and filthy grounds. Their indulgence in unfair acts and mal- administration and obstructing the delivery of justice and delaying the matter has been proved. Yet they are playing above law and by taking fresh plea victimizing me. A police case has also been registered against the rival applicant u/s 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34. Whereas 120 B also attracts and head and bureaucrates and state functionaries are euqally guilty of practicing fraud by using fake/tampered to seek the lease.

What should I do against the rival applicants and State who in convinnace with Mineral Mafia, Bhu Mafia are victimizing me. Please provide solution with relevant case law and action plan for instant relief please.
Regards
Bhargava
Against the State Govt./Central Govt. and bureaucrates indulged in above game of conspiracy exposed to the hilt. No getting any relief from Mining tribunal.
What should I do ? High Court delhi, High Court MP, CVC, Lokayukta, or

Mayank Mishra   07 November 2009 at 15:04

CIDCO NOC to Mortgage the flat

Dear Sir,
i am buying a flat in sanapada navi mumbai,for that i need NOC from CIDCO to mortgage the flat with housing finance company, but the society where i am buying this flat is comes under Gaonthan plot and have triplet agreement with CIDCO,now CIDCO not issuing NOC saying that"Conveyance deed is not happened yet"
please suggest me what should i do now? even the secretory and chairman is also not coperating.

natarajan s   07 November 2009 at 12:14

Non registration of our civic body

sir,

I am residing at Mahalakshmi nagar Adambakkam Chennai - We have a forum (i.e. an association like welfare association) called as MAHALAKSHMI CIVIC FORUM.
it was started way back 1989 under societies registration act & later the registration was never been renewed.

kindly advise whether could it be renewed? how much it will cost?
or else how to close it down? what to do with the funds we have in the name of forum. if a new association in the name as mahalakshmi nagar welfare association is started then any possibility of transfering these funds to that new body?

what is the legality in this issue?

kindly clarify. Thanking you very much

S Natarajan
Treasurer - Mahalaksmi civic forum

email natleoin1962@yahoo.com

Dr.Anjani Kumar Vaidyasen,09431271130,Patna   07 November 2009 at 07:37

Admission of petition

In a civil miscellaneous case under order 8 rule 13 of CPC filed in the court in which the munsiff court passed an order in default of time,the applicant moved the high court for reopen the case on ground of that court has dismissed the case on default in the process of part wittness and high court subsequently passed an order and directed to the lower court for reopen the case and mention the condition that the applicant will deposit Rs.2500 within the perioud of producing the order in the court,the matter is that the applicant produced the order before the court on March 2009 and thereafter the court became vacant due to transfer of the munsiff and at last the applicant deposite the amount in September 2009. I want to know that any legal provison can be plead for acceptance of the said amount to the opposit party and continue the case in the said court or any other remedy in the matter?

Anonymous   06 November 2009 at 22:39

Mental Disability

Respected sir, An educated adult person 'A' is suffering from Bipolar spectrum disorder a kind of mental disease, which comes under mental disability. He is jobless and can't take care of himself needs constant care. His parent wish to sell some property, and fix the amount in his('A') name, so that he('A') can manage/lead his life comfortably with the interest of the fixed deposit. Since he can not manage the property. As these persons are vulnerable of various types of cheating. What is the maximum limit of amount that can be deposited? What are the various provisions in laws which protects such persons and their property? Can anyone disposes/occupy his property? Will he get any benefit in Income tax? What are the other benefits that he can get? Thanks.

Anonymous   06 November 2009 at 19:50

Maximum Limit to sell property

What is the maximum value of the property to be sold without income tax clearance?

Soma   06 November 2009 at 18:39

Speed Post

Whether a consumer case before consumer forum can be initiated against Post Office for deficiency in service with regard to SPEED POST?
Who shall be appropiate O.P?

anjaneyulu   06 November 2009 at 18:16

C.P.C.,

In a claim petition under order 21 rule 58 basing on un-registered agreement, the said claim petition is maintainable?

anjaneyulu   06 November 2009 at 17:49

order 9 rule 13 petition filed by 3rd party maintainbility

if, the 3rd party to the suit canfile order 9 rule 13 petitiion?