Anonymous
22 January 2010 at 13:33
Will the Experts, please enlighten as to weather one can submit additional evidence when the case has reached to the stage for oral arguements ? If yes, what is the procedure and if no what is the other way out, since the evidence are crucial in the case.
Anonymous
22 January 2010 at 09:27
Dear sir,
We have a Forum by name Mahalakshmi Nagar Civic Forum. It is registed under socities act way back in 1989.
Unfortunately the forum was not renewed its registration so far. No papers were filed. our option is as follows
option 1 To get it renewed as of date
Option 2 To close the forum and start a fresh entity by name as Mahalakshmi Nagar welfare association.
how to do either of the one? with regard to option 2 how to close the funds of MCF?
kindly advise
S Natarajan
Suwarn Rajan
21 January 2010 at 17:50
For more information and help visit www.airyourlegalqueries.com
Suwarn Rajan
21 January 2010 at 17:43
For more information and help visit www.airyourlegalqueries.com
Suwarn Rajan
21 January 2010 at 17:31
For more information and help visit www.airyourlegalqueries.com
Anonymous
21 January 2010 at 16:46
Respected Experts,
Can you refer me a Apex Court finding on "Quotating a wrong provision of law in the petition cannot be a ground for rejection of a petition".
Thanking you.
Anonymous
21 January 2010 at 14:50
land allotted to the plaintiff in Andhra Pradesh of 2.35cents by the government and he is peaceful possession. recently the same site has been resumed by the govt and allotted to the Municipality without any prior notice. plaintiff approached the court for grant of injuction restraining the defendants for construction of dumping yard in the site and declaration of title.
court asked to submit the valuation certificate from the sub registrar and asked the court fee for two different prayers. already he paid the court of Rs.119/- on notional value of Rs. 2,000/-. file not taken on to record. decissions of any court regarding the submission of valuation certificate is not necessary/mandatory is required. what is to be done. the said site in the recors of sub registrar was mentioned as private land the value exceed the value of 1lack which is out of jurisdiction of junior civil judge. site in revenue records mentiond as government land and issued to the said plaintiff 30years ago issued title deeds and pass book regarding that. suggestion is urgent.
Binod Kumar Mishra
21 January 2010 at 12:56
Dear Experts,
my friend is in government service governed by the central government rules. he has some matrimonial disputes and being known to this that the matter is subjudice, the HOD of the said department initiated an inquiry under rule 14 for penalising major penalty.
my friend objected to this vide rule 12(2) of CCS(CCA) Rules that since the HOD is personally concerned with his case, he can't act as disciplinary authority in his case and prefer an appeal to Appellate Authority of the said department but surprisingly the said request has been disposed by the same disciplinary authority and later on the same disciplinary authority has put my friend under suspension pending criminal case against him (a 498-A case was filed by his estranged wife).
later on the EO followed the same path as suggested by the HOD and concluded inquiry ex-parte without disposing of the representation of the delinquent employee.
the delienquet employee later submitted his defence brief and the EO has found him guilty of the offences, which is still pending before supreme court of india. now the HOD has sent the EO report for comments of the charged employee.
the employee prefer an appeal before CAT, PAtna praying for interim relief that the HOD may be restrained to pass any order based on the report of bias EO.
the CAT, PAtna has entertained the application and notice has been issued to government but refused to give the interim relief on the grounds that how we can directed an HOD to pass any order.
the question is now this that whether my friend can prefer an appeal before High Court because after receiving the defence brief of the charged official the bias HOD can passed immediate order for imposing major penalty on him and will make the earlier application of CAT, infructues.
my learned friend can you guide me with suitable remedy as the charged official has to give his defence brief before 1st of february, 2010.
it is very urgent so please suggest with some case laws.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Divorce of a Roman Catholic marriage in India
A a Roman Catholic by birth married B a Roman Catholic by birth, married in New Delhi in the year 1986 on December 06 in accordance with Roman Catholic rules in a Roman Catholic Church. On 18.12.1986 B went to B's maternal house and stayed there till 07.01.1987. Again B went to B's maternal house on 11.1.1987 and stayed there till 15.2.1987. Again B went to B's maternal house on 22.2.1987 till 3.3.1987. Again B went to B's maternal house on 13.3.1987 In the meanwhile A was under Asthmatic attack as he was chronic asthmatic patient and was hospitalised in New Delhi around 23.3.1987 and ispite of several phone calls by A's widow aged heartpatient mother and other relatives and doctors of the hospital to B to come back and stay with B's hospitalised husband, B with B's elder sister and younger brother came to visit A in the hospital on 16.4.1987 as a visitor only and left the hospital and A within twenty minutes. B behaved like an outside visitor only. However on 29.4.1987 A was discharged from the Hospital without any relief and was advised to get admitted in AIMS after a day or two. On 30.4.1987 a Sub Inspector from Women Cell and Police Station came to A's house on criminal case filed by B that A had beaten her badly. The SI went to the hospital and got the hospital that morning and recorded the first hand report, thus claiming B's complain as non maintainable. However, at the Women Cell at New Delhi B gave a written undertaking that B does not want to live with A and has no dealing with A, hence B is taking all her belongings back with B in the presence of two policemen. After that A never saw B though A and B both lives in New Delhi. The Church many time tried to make B understand to come back to B's matrimonial house but B always refused. After a period of seven year A file with the Church Tribunal for A and B's marriage as null and void under the Church rules. Many time the Priest said that B is coming on so and so day and A was always present on that day but B never turned up. B kept on avoiding A and till date B keeps on avoiding and refusing to come back to A. Hence A is fed up with Roman Catholic religion and want to leave it and file a divorce under the law of the Country in the Court of Law in New Delhi. Now can any of my learnt friends tell me the procedure as to how to and where to file a divorce case with the Court of Law in New Delhi. In the meanwhile Roman Catholic will surely put its dirty foot in the way of this divorce case, as Roman Catholic Church is against a Divorce. But A wants a divorce and settle in life once again independently without any Roman Catholic Church touch. Please help this case and oblige as A is poor and alone as A has lost his mother and job as well, so a sure and safe way is expected who will fight for justice as in this case.