Whatis the difference between the revision and review under civil procedure code.
My Aunt and her children who are staying outside the country had been bequeathed with landed property in the village by way of a registered settlement deed in the year1975 by her brother and mother jointly.
The property initially had come jointly to the share of her brother and mother in 1966 by a family partition deed( her brother was a minor then)along with other properties.There were other members of the family in this partition deed. After recieving the present disputed property the same was developed by way of coconut plantation by my aunt through her other relatives,all these years .Her mother expired couple of years back. All these years the revenue record (ie RTC/katha in karnataka) was not changed( mutated) by my aunt as she was not familiar with these matters and had left everything in the care of mother and relatives,and the RTC was in her mothers name only. When she became aware of that recently in 2008, she planned for change of RTC. Unfortunately then she realised that the original settlement deed is found to be lost. As such she had to obtain a certified copy of the registered settlement deed and apply for the change in RTC with the tahsildar along with this certified copy. The tahsildar issued notice to her brother as per practice and her brother suddenly sprang a surprise filing his objection saying that he never was a party in the settlement deed of 1975 and the document is fraudulent and concoted. His objection were however overruled by the tahsildar and he was suggested to move to civil court for his grievance if any.
The brother now has moved to the civil court and has obtained a stay exparte preventing my aunt and her children from alienating the property and is challenging the settlement deed
and seeking declaration of the settlement deed as fraudulent,concocted,void and not valid and binding on himself and also seeking partition of the said property and for allotment of half share in the said property.
My aunt is relying on me to take up the legal problem.We have engaged a lawyer in the town near the village and he is saying in the absence of the original settlement deed it would be a difficult matter to handle.
I shall be greatful if some of you would advise us as to how to tackle the issues legally and reference to similar cases.
with regards
prakash
can u please suggest how much waiver can i get from HSBC for my case of personal loan so that i can negotaite to that extent in the Lok adalat as my financial position is not well right now. My principal amount is around 113000. Loan amount was 155000, I have paid 17 installment on time without any default.Now it is overdue by 7 months. Please help, i shall be highly obliged.
I had taken a loan from HSBC but due to some unavidable huge losses, i could not repay my loan from last 7 months. yesterday hsbc has sent me a lok adalat notice which is going to be held on 16.01.09 at delhi High Court. I don't whether the notice is fake or actual. I want to finish up the loan . I have paid 17 installments on time out of 48. but now i can not repay it. Please suggest how can i settle my loan & how i will know the notice is real or fake?
Please help
Hi Sir/Madam I am searching following citation
if there is no prayer of interium relief in the plaint plaintiff is not entitle to get interium relief (exhibit 5 )
please tell me if there is any citation
How is interest calculated in cases involving money, example recovery of money.
Is the interest calculated from the time I lent money or from the date of filing the case. And also after the judgment if there is still time for the borrower, how is the interest calculated and what rate.
What is commercial rate and when is commercial rate used.
When is cross objection under O 41 R22 filed instead of an RA or RFA. What is the difference betwween the two and when is one chosen over the other. What is the difference in effect if any in chosing one over the other.
Can by an unregistered agreement a suit for specific performance and statutory obligation be filed against a developer, this unregistered agreement is entered into between a tenant and a developer and landlord who is a confirming party.
Can it be admissible under MOFA 4A.
Property is in Sub.Mumbai.
Agreement says of developer giving new premises in lieu of the old tenanted premises free of cost on ownership basis.
Agreement contains all details of performance, course of action,and 'Plans' identifying promised flats.
Agreement is made under MOFA.
When building is nearing completion the developer for the first time sends a without prejudice letter to the tenant confirming the agreement but saying that he will not be able to give flats as per agreement instead he will give half in A'Wing' and half in the other.
This Developer is eyeing to earn more profit from selling this large and three side facing flat promised to the tenant,
naturally due to his greed.
Above agreement contains clause saying it is the duty of the developer to pay the stamp duty and registration charges.
Can you suggest further course of actions!
if a tenant doesn nt cross in appeal on grounds of nuisance and personal necessity. what will be its effect. does it means that he admits the same.please provide thejudgemnts in favour of landlord the stating that tenant has admitted it by not availing opportunity.
thanks
probate jurisdiction
Whether district has jurisdiction to entertain first appeal in probate application? if senior division has decided probate then where can appeal lies against it whether district or high court?