Chetan
20 February 2010 at 20:29
Facts of the case :-
That my client get an earnest note executed in his favour about the house property in 1981
but the seller on several request did not execute the sale deed therefore my client send an notice and remain present on a day which was mentioned in the notice but the seller didn't came
That til today the property is in possession of my client and let out it to several person upto today
That the seller have 3 sons out of which 1 son on December 2009 approach to the Gram Panchayt and made application not to mutate the property in the name of my client, the officer of Panchayt published a public notice and my client raise the objection
Qurstion :- under above circumstance what shall i have to be done / advised
1) whether I file suit for declaration, permanent injunction.
Pls reply urgently with citations
regards
Dr C Suresh
20 February 2010 at 18:03
After arguments are over by both sides and the judge says Judgment reserved, what does it mean? And what is the difference when Judge says "For Orders" instaead of Judgment reserved, after arguments are over?
Anonymous
20 February 2010 at 16:21
Can a person delegating his power for transfer of shares held in his name to someone else by way of specific power of attorney , can exercise those powers during the existence of the power of attorney.
shrikant chede
20 February 2010 at 16:01
Respected learned experts
My query is as below
A is one of suerty for loan amount ,which is taken by B ,B asset attach by bank due to default Now B has no assets A owns a building having two floors ,bank seize I'st floor for recovery of loan amount being surety ,now bank wants to seize ground floor of A's Residance for recovery of same loan amount . my question is
1)wheather can we bring stay on recovery of loan amount from surety ,from court,if yes then from which court
2)A's mother is 85 year old ,she is ill and advised by doctor complete bed rest
3)A is in GOvt job and his date of retirement 1/06/10 on retirement he will get retirement benifits ie cpf , Graduity etc
4)A is willing to pay the loan amount in installments
On above grounds whether court can grant stay to Attachment of A's House
Anonymous
20 February 2010 at 15:48
Can a person delegating his rights for transfer of shares to somewone can also exercise the same on his own during the subsitenece of Power of Attorney
dhiru
20 February 2010 at 15:12
does declaring a monument protected changes the ownership of monument to archeology then archeology doesnt need to pay for its aquisition
Praveen
20 February 2010 at 12:35
I applied for a residential plot under residential scheme to Urban Improvement Trust and deposited application amount. Plot allotted and UIT issued a demand Note of Rs. 2.30 Lacs. At this time whole scheme area was encroached by the unwanted persons.
I asked to UIT to remove the encroachment so that I can deposit the demand note amount – verbally. But they said first you have to deposit the demand note.
I filed a suit
Most of the plot allotters not deposited the demand note.
One of the allotted person deposited the demand note. And he went to consumer court stating that there is encroachments on the scheme area and UIT has not started any development work.
Court has issued an order to pay an interest to him till the date of removal of encroachments
UIT is conducting Trust meeting in one of the meeting UIT committed that due the encroachment over 80% of the area many of the allotters are not depositing the demand note.
After removal of encroachment some of the allottee approached to the UIT / Govt. to Regularis the allotment and Govt. has issued and order for 15 allotters stating Plot is being regularized and they have to pay the penalty and interest as stated in the brochure of the scheme issued with application form.
I also deposited the Demand Draft in favour the UIT as soon as I came to that encroachment has been removed.
Till date my case pending
May I get the relief and get regularized the plot without any penalty and interest.
anjaneyulu
19 February 2010 at 23:51
dear sir, i am appearing on behalf of the plaintiff, suit filed for recovery of money basing on the pronote,the defendant filed a Sec.45 Evi. petition that when the revenue stamp was printed, actually pronote date is 12-11-2001 but the expert says that the revenue stamp was printed in the year 2002, if, i want to get win, what i will do and how much the judge considers the expert opinion, with relevan citations.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
19 February 2010 at 23:14
Dear Ld Counsel's,
What is the difference between these two terms ? When and where they are used as in Plaintiff and defendants suit ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Adverse Possession
But,
the person who executed the Earnest note is dead under such circumstances whether I can made a party to his Son who made mutation obejction
another is the earnest note is of 1981 and the much time has been elapsed whether it is fit for limitation Act