SAJAN ANTONY N.
28 February 2010 at 17:48
suit is for injuction aginst the forceful eviction from the rented building. status quo was ordered. meanwhile the ownership of the building changed. the new owner demolished the building. he was impleeded.whether the prosecution i.a. has an indepedant existance, because the relief of the suit is no more ie. the building.
Anonymous
28 February 2010 at 14:46
Hi,
I had lent the money for a distant family relative (woman & her husband) in Mumbai in April 2008 to pay advance to rent a new flat, as they had financial problems. After 2 months, I had to go to out of Mumbai as I got job in my native place and they promised to return me in installments through bank deposit to my account.
After leaving Maharashtra, when I tried to call them, they purposely started avoiding my calls and ignored me. Even after a year, they had not returned 20% of the money. Last year,I got a chance to talk to them on phone along with my parents but these people changed their attitude & started to abuse my family in a very cheap and derogatory language. I had recorded all the phone conversations and filed a NC complaint at the local police station in August 09.
After a week, the Investigation officer(PSI) demaned bribe Rs 10,000/- from me to get them arrested and refused to do any inquiry without money. However after repeated requests, he took Rs 4,000/- from me to call them to Police Station. He gave them warning and got a summons notice signed by them. He also arranged for a compromise and asked them to start returning the money in installments and asked both of us not to keep any contact with each other in future.
At that time, I didn't take the case to court & showed sympathy to them as they were my distant relative and also I was out of Mumbai. At the police station, the lady threatened me that she will file a wrong case against me if I file a case in court...saying that I attempted to rape her and I tried to rob their house & other false allegations which never happened.
Later, I got a note signed by the woman & her husband mentioning that they owe me only some money as against the actual amount. They started to pay for 2 months by installments after the complaint and stopped paying me back. I have not tried to call them after this as per instructions by Police. We are a respectful family and well educated. Nobody has hurt us or insulted us like this before. These people have humiliated our family very cheaply, destroyed our mental peace and also caused an irrecoverable emotional damage for the mistake of trusting them.
Now, even though I'm out of Maharashtra, I want to pursue this case and have them punished legally for their offense.They have not paid back my money even after 2 years and abused/threated me & my family. I'm planning to visit the local Police station and get a FIR now.. I'm also confused since I cant trust the police as they seem to do anything for people who pay them money and also I'm not a local Marathi guy. These people who cheated me are dangerous and there is a woman involved who is threatening me to file false cases. I read an article on the internet which said that Indian Laws support women.
I do not know much on the Indian laws and need help on how to approach. Things I have as evidence:
1) Recorded conversation of all phone call threats and verbal abuse
2) Note signed by them mentioning they owe me money
3) Duplicate NC complaint copy from police station stamped with a complaint no. & date
Please advice the next steps..Thanks!
(Sorry for lengthy mail to explain my scenario)
Anonymous
28 February 2010 at 13:36
I am 3 year law student kindly send the case laws custody of illegitimate child
Anonymous
28 February 2010 at 11:10
I am a regular Principal of a college. I was on casual leave when a teacher was allowed to officiate . The concerned teacher was found sitting in the chair meant for the Principal of the college without any permission from any authority. Please advise if such act is an act of indiscipline and miscoduct on the part of the officiating person? What legal action can be initiated agianst such person? A show cause notice has been served from my end. Please advise.
vijay
27 February 2010 at 17:12
On 2002 my friend puchased one land from one Joseph.Joseph died on 1997.his wife and children gave power of attorney to one Krishan to sale the property. Krishan sold the property to my friend.But now my friend came to know that on 2002 the same property which my friend purchased from Joseph was sold to one Kandaswamy by Joseph itself.Actually joseph died on 1997.The kandaswamy on 2005 sold this property to one Lekshmi. How my friend can claim the ownership of the property?
Anonymous
27 February 2010 at 15:45
Assessing officer has not accepted the Affidavit provided by the Donor in a gift .
My querry is that under which Section and relevant case laws we can ask the higher authourities to accept the same affidavit as Non acceptance of affidavit will lead to falsifying of the truth & onus will lie on the assseeing officer to prove that affidavit provided is wrong
Manoj
deepak
27 February 2010 at 13:30
civil justice senior. div. court gives order in favor of plaintiff for his share in property. the suit is more than Rs 100000. now in which court plaintiff should lodge a caveat? whether in district court or high court or both. is there any valuation limit to lodge the caveat such as for suit?
Anonymous
27 February 2010 at 12:55
Whether evidences aduced in Criminal Law can be used in Civil Suits? for example Forensic Report recieved in Criminal case addmisible under section 293 Cr. P.C that certain document is fordged and fabricated.
Whether FSL report can be taken on record by Civil Court on an application moved by the parties under Order 8 Rule 1A CPC for defending his right under Injunction?
Kindly Advice....
Anonymous
27 February 2010 at 12:48
Society held election in 2001. second election was held in 2006. The Society has taken stand that the first election has become infractuosus nad the same is to be dismissed and in support have relied on AIR 1987 SUPREME COURT 1577, ALLAHABAD, cIVIL APPEAL nO. 430 F 1982, d/- 11-5-1987 DHARTIPAKAR MADANLAL aGARWAL VS. RAJIV GANDHI. mY QUERI DOES THE AFORESAID REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT APPLICABLE IN ELECTION DISPUTE FILED UNDER MCS ACT. RULES AND BYELAWS. IF POSSIBLE GIVE SUPPORT OF YOUR SAY UNDER MCS ACT AND OBLIGE.
THANKS
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
interfering in the proceedings of consumer court
can any court including the supreme court interfere in the proceedings of a consumer case at a consumer court before the final verdict by the concerned court?
If so on what situation?