kanti kumar
10 March 2010 at 00:16
Is there any judgement of any court regarding the above mentioned order and rule for presenting relevant documents by the public authorities at the later stage of the suit
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 18:30
Sir, if any listed company has received one letter and gives an acknowledgent only for the receipt of letter. What is procedure for an acknowledgement for the receipt of letter only (contents of letter has not being verified at the time of receipt of letter).
Further, if any of the contents is not accepatable to the company, what is procedure to be follow by the company and within what timeframe.
Sir, if possible, please tell me the relevent Section Number of the relevant act under which the same is required.
Thanks.
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 17:34
sir,
i am residing in a residential premises and in the same building three illegal coaching institutes are running causing unidentified persons visit in entrance dead end lane purely meant for the residents,relatives,friends of two buildings. i want to stop unidentified visitors causing nuisance. pl guide what i should do and tell me how or where to report of the above illegal coaching institute running in residential area of Dehradun.
vinod kumar
09 March 2010 at 13:56
someone has a residential accomodation which falls under delhi rent control act as the rent is below Rs 3500. now the lndlord says that the maintenance chrges paid to the society can be included in the rent and hence the rent + society charges ( though paid by the tenant) exceed the abovesaid amount.the landlord has threatened with legal notice demanding eviction since now the house does not remain under rent control anymore. Has the HC actually ruled like this and has the SC upheld this
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 12:41
I would like to know if I can approach the consumer court for redressal if the heirs of the owner of a property bought by me refuse to sign the sale deed even though the payment is done in full and the same is acknowledged by the owner's power of attorney holder who was the developer at the time when the owner was alive. The owners had entrusted the developer with the job to collect the amount through a power of attorney made by them in favour of the developer. The heirs have come into the picture after the death of the owner and the delay for making the sale deed earlier was due to indecision on the part of the owners to form a society. The heirs are today claiming additional amount over and above the agreed amount paid by me and they say that they want the money for signing the sale deed and they will not be issuing any receipt or acknowledgment for the same. I was also given to understand that I could get the sale deed registered even if one of the parties (usually the seller) does not cooperate. Pl. advice under which sections in the registration act is this possible and also on what grounds or clauses can I approach the consumer court. Advise urgently. Thank you.
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 09:56
Hello,
As you know, My wife has filed 24 HMA against me. The order has been against me(copy attached as attachment).
I am going to file an appeal petition before the Hon’ble High court of Delhi in 24 HMA, for the judgment against me.
Please can you provide me some sort of citations/ judgments of Hon’ble High court/Supreme court, in favour of me so that I can have to pay a minimum amount.
bhanu pratap720
09 March 2010 at 08:50
considering the doctrine of comparative hardship and sec 21 of u.p.rent control act are there any recent case laws which would favour the tenant ?
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 03:02
Dear SIR/MADAM,
I need your expert advise regarding my marriage through ARYA SAMAJ MANDIR.
I am 27 yr old , christian male and an engineer by profession.
I am in love with my real uncle's daughter (my fathers real brother).
She is 25. She is also working in same town.
Our parents would definitely not allow our marriage since we have good reputayion in our village.
Hence I wish to know that whether we can get married through ARYA SAMAJ MANDIR?
What is the procedure and is it legal to do that way?
Kindly help as we can not live without each other.
Thanks and regards!
J SMITH
Md Shadab Ansari
09 March 2010 at 00:18
Is Conversation between Advocate & other party (not the Advocate) come under priviledge or professional communication as stated in Section 126 of Evidence Act?? Can this recorded conversation be adduced as evidence???As in that conversation the opponent party accepted the deeds done by him..Section 126 of Evidence Act prohibits the disclosure of any fact of his own client....Need suggestions and opinions....
Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Content Letter Not Accepatable to company after 2 years.
Sir,during december'06,I have done some work for one company at consideration of Rs.ABC/-. I have sent a letter to the company during Dec'06 contain the follwoing 3 matter:
1) My demand for Rs.ABC/-
2) One future demand i.e. if the same work has been redone after 3 years i.e.Dec'09, company has to pay me an amount of Rs.XYZ.
3) Acknowledgement for the same(above) as
"kindly acknowledge the same".
Accordingly, company has paid me a cheque for Rs.ABC during Dec'06 (as per my letter content 'A').
Further, the company has acknowledge the said letter by putting a signature of company official and the rubber stamp of the company (as per letter content 'C')
Terms 'B' has to be fulfilled in future i.e.Dec'09, if same works get redone.
Surprisingly, during Dec'09, the same work has been get redone,but company refused to make payment of Rs.XYZ (as per the terms No.2 of the letter drafted & acknowledged in Dec'06). Company now (during Jan'2010) state that signature and rubber stamp on the letter (Dt.Dec'06) is only an acknowledgement for the receipt of the letter and terms No.2 WAS NOT ACCEPATABLE TO THEM. (company has not rejected any of the contents of the letter till Jan'2010).
After my efforts of 3 months and on my failure to receive the amount from the company, I have served a 21 days Notice to the company through my local lawyer under section 434 of the companies Act'1956.
Sir, please advise me whether I proceed further in the matter, if company doesn't pay me the XYZ amount within 21 days and remain stick to his stand.
Awaiting for your reply.
Thanks.