Anonymous
07 May 2010 at 08:00
sir,
I had been issued three cheques by a courier co. as repayment of the money I had paid them to get their franchisee of which one of the cheques was disbursed while the other two bounced, after chasing the co. they again issued two cheques after deducting Rs 3000 without any reason after a period of six months but this time too the cheques bounced, What legal action can be taken against the co. Are there any ngo who are associated with such problems as I dont't have enough funds to fight back with the co. in a court.
Anandan
06 May 2010 at 22:52
whether maps downloaded from internet like google maps be admissible in the court of law as evidence, for showing the boundary, area development, etc. whether there is any recent case laws relating to electronic media.
Sanjay
06 May 2010 at 17:18
I applied for a Car Loan, and my bank after a few days, showed me a CIBIL report, having 3.5lac of Personal Loan, (which I had not taken at all), and furhter there was 2 credit card mentioned in my name, (which was again not availed by me). I did pay and avail my report (I got it on 15th March 2010) to check the Banks name etc, and then I communicated with the Banks, and each back replied to me back saying that they have corrected the mistake. ( Communication includes emailing to the nodal officer, and even sending a legal notice).
Further to the communication by the banks, I asked for a new CIBIL repor on 27th April 2010, and I have not got the report tilldate.
Now when one of the banks, sent a proof ( they generated my credit report) on 6th May 2010, to my surprise, I see that there has been a 10lac & 1.7lac written off amount which was not there in the previous report generated on 15th March. It says that an amount of 10lac is written off form Credit Card, and 1.7lac of Auto Loan. I have no clue on how banks are reprotign this to CIBIL, where in I have not even availed of the CC or auto loan that they are mentioning.
Please advice on how do I go about getting these sorted out. I am based out of Bangalore. Is there any legal expert who would handle this to get these reporting cleared
Sanjay
Manish Singh
06 May 2010 at 14:50
Dear All,
please enlighten me on this aspect of litigation -
if the High Court mistakenly appoints a person as a valuer of some property treating him as a C.A. but as a matter of fact, that person has renounced his CA authorisation and is not entitled to sign as a CA, then which application should be made to the HC for rectification of the said Order.
will it be u/151 CPC?
also, what should be the format of the application since that person must be the applicant then how it should be made.
Please enlighten.
Anonymous
06 May 2010 at 13:15
Respected Experts,
I want to know the clarifications with regard to the following.
1. SLP (Special Leave petition).
In this the Honourable Supreme court granted Status-quo at the time of filing of a case. Now it is coming for hearing. Even if the petitioner have legal points, can it be closed at this stage. The order in SLP is final or not.
2. Leave Granted. What it means.
3. Civil Appeal. (When the SLP converted into Civil Appeal) At what circumstances.
4. So what is difference between SLP and Civil Appeal.
Please clarify my doubt.
pratik
06 May 2010 at 11:02
Lawyer , advocate , CA , CS or ICWA.
Can the abovemmentioned member can appear to the Arbitration Suit or appeals.
Please tell me the section or any case laws under which the abocementioned person can appear.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
bala
06 May 2010 at 10:23
hello sir my doubt is
Illegitimate son of a Christian Father. The Father died intestate. Now whether this illegitimate son has any right over the property of his father or whether he is entitled for any share in his father property?
Sir, If the answer is yes, under what provision and i also need a suitable case law to substantiate it.
Anonymous
06 May 2010 at 07:37
Sir,
In a demarcation case the applicant (who is not having any land in the plot) has filed/produced rent receipt of some other land which is also in the name of other. The whole proceeding was carried out to extract money from me. When I refused to pay, they made a false report, showing the land belongs to applicant. Since beginning I was not allowed to even look at the application and the document filed. Now after finalizing the report, when I asked the certified copy of the document, they are not giving it to me by saying that it is a photocopy. Entire proceeding was based on forged document. I have complained to all superior officer but of no use. Now how can I get the entire record seized, which contains forged document. If they will come to know my activity they may replace the forged documents. From bottom to top all are corrupt. It is a small town of jharkhand.
What should I do?
G. ARAVINTHAN
05 May 2010 at 23:01
Wife died leaving minor children.
Husband married other lady, not maintaining children.
Now maternal grand mother, in the capacity of guardian for the minor children, initiates maintenance proceedings.
Pending proceedings, she died. no other close relatives for minors. Now who can represent the minor children?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 13 & 20 Transfer Of Property ACt, 1882
Section 13 & 20 Transfer Of Property ACt, 1882.
Pls explain me the below mentioned para in detail with the easy examples pls experts explain me and if any notes available then pls post it .
Section 13 of the transfer of property act, 1882.
Transfer for benefit of unborn person.- Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created for the benefit of a person not in existence at the date of the transfer, subject to a prior interest created by the same transfer, the interest created for the benefit of such person shall not take effect, unless it extends to the whole of the remaining interest of the transferor in the property.
Section 20 of the transfer of property act, 1882.
When unborn person acquires vested interest on transfer for his benefit.- Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created for the benefit of a person not then living, he acquires upon his birth, unless a contrary intention appears from the terms of the transfer, a vested interest, although he may not be entitled to the enjoyment thereof immediately on his birth.
Meaning of vested interest as per section 20 of the transfer of property act, 1882.
Any case laws than pls put forward.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
Pls explain me.