S RAJAKUMAR
16 September 2010 at 21:04
The city civil court, chennai has rejected petition filed under Order VI Rule 17 for taking additional written statement in a ordinary suit for recovery of money on a pronote. The reason for rejection stated was Since PW1 Cross is over, additional written statement cannot be entertained. and also the Correct provision of law is not mentioned. Further, the PW1 was not the actual plaintiff but he is the authorised by the Plaintiff and also he is the husband of the plaintiff and a witness to the transaction. Kindly advice me, what course of action I have to take?
Chetan
16 September 2010 at 20:52
What is the limitation to claim share by daughters in fathers property (Ancestral // Self Acquired)
pls guide urgent
Anonymous
16 September 2010 at 20:47
acquisition under national highway act 1956is done..additional commissioner is appointed as a arbitrator..application for enhancement before arbitrator is pending.the reply is filed by the national highway authority on my application.. now the case is fixed for documentary evidence from applicant.what is the procedure ? is it necessary to file the original document or only photocopy is enough.
chaitu.....
16 September 2010 at 15:30
dear sir,
we have taken bank loan for HOUSING LOAN, but we gave it for commercial purpose(for school) now, the bank officers say that it is a crime, but we said, u dont hv any prob, regarding the loan payments and we also paying every month. loan amt:15 lakhs????
Hitender Gaur
16 September 2010 at 13:53
I just want to know that A Central Govt. Autonomy awarded a constrcution work of its building to a contractor. It is mentioned in tender documents that if contractor wish to arrange water for constrcution use/labour use from Employer side (Govt. Autonomy) then 1% of the tender cost shall be deducted from his Bills. Contractor is using site bore water for constrcution use and labour consumption use. My query is:
1. Can a contractor/person use bore water for commercial use if the land is concern to Central Govt. If yes why? if No-please mention the section barring him to use ground water for construction use/commercial use?
2. if there is any need to get the permission to use ground water for commercial purpose/construction porpuse from whom he should get permission?
3. If some one using ground bore water without any priore permission of any State/Govt. authority, which section's violation he is doing? and which type of conviction he can face in future?
State is Haryana and Distt. is Kurukshetra
Anonymous
16 September 2010 at 13:18
Sir,
Good Dsy
I need information on the following:
That father of my sister-in-law constantly threats my brother and his family to implicate in false case of dowry harassement.Though dowry has not been demanded from our side But he used to send fake legal notices in order to extort money.my brother has concilliate very much but he still defaming the name of my brother in the society
I have heard that under section 3 of Dowry prohibition act -1961 giving dowry is also an offence
Can he booked for this section if he repeatedly threatened us?
Please inform whether his disclosure via reply to the notice that he has given dowry (against our consent) during and after the marriage will be the sufficient proof for our defence?
Anonymous
16 September 2010 at 12:20
My father was retired from railways in feb 2008.He was expired on 22 dec 2008,and left one married son(me) and two married sisters behind him.My mother was already expired before my fathers death.
Now railways has to pay some dues of my father like salary arears,gratuity difference and leave difference and for this they want succession certificate pls suggest if succession certificate is required in this case,if yes then what is the procedure to obtain it.
As I am the only son of my father.My one sister also got expired in april 2010 with two sons left behind.Now me and my other sister are the only survivors.
Anonymous
16 September 2010 at 10:08
for haryana rent act any property reffered to under section 13 for eviction of premises.
now is the treatment of all proerties (commercial or residential) same for all subsections of section 13 or is this only applicable for Personal necessity ???
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Hindu succesion amendment act 2005
Judgments in favour of daughter`s for share in fathers estate,who died intestate...