Anonymous
28 October 2010 at 20:41
Dear experts,
Please suggest me….I am in Govt job , posted at East Champaran(Bihar). About twelve years prior to this job, I reside in a rental house at another District and after joining this job I left that house in the year 1998 and the caretaker of that house owner kept another renter without the consent of the house owner and after ten years he (house owner) not succeeded in doing vacation the house filed an eviction suit against me. Now, the renter vacated the house sue motto or perhaps some pressure. I make a contact with the house owner and asked as to why he filed the suit against me, he(house owner) replied that he is withdrawing the suit,but did not do so up till now. Therefore, what can I do ? Can I file a defamation suit or criminal case of defamation , in this district against him for bringing a false suit against me,if he withdrew the case ?
Daksh
28 October 2010 at 15:22
Dear All,
Kindly provide to the undersigned authorities to the effect that on account of pendency of the Application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code the delay in filing of the written statement does not forfeit defendant's right to file written statement even after 90 days period as prescribed in the CPC.
Best Regards
Daksh
Anonymous
28 October 2010 at 12:31
Respected sirs/madams,
reference-my post on 25/10/10.though I received replies till some doubts are there.I
could not do FIR & inform insurance company because of serious injuries{head injuries}in
road accident(motorcycle).after recovery I came to know that my pillion rider who was also got injured had put claim petition in
MACT, blamed me for rash driving.in the petition copy I found in 1st page-accused no-1-the tempo driver,no-2 me& no-3 my insurance company and in the final page the tempo driver only mentioned as accused.what does it mean? am I also an accused?what shoulu I do now.can I file a case against pillion rider for blaming?
pl.suggest.
Regards.
Anonymous
28 October 2010 at 12:29
Respected sirs/madams,
reference-my post on 25/10/10.though I received replies till some doubts are there.I
could not do FIR & inform insurance company because of serious injuries{head injuries}in
road accident(motorcycle).after recovery I came to know that my pillion rider who was also got injured had put claim petition in
MACT, blamed me for rash driving.in the petition copy I found in 1st page-accused no-1-the tempo driver,no-2 me& no-3 my insurance company and in the final page the tempo driver only mentioned as accused.what does it mean? am I also an accused?what shoulu I do now.can I file a case against pillion rider for blaming?
pl.suggest.
Regards.
b. sudhakar
28 October 2010 at 12:27
On what condition can we go to court for impleading petition
B.Sudhakar
Anonymous
28 October 2010 at 12:09
hello sir , i am very thankful to u for guiding ME time to time wth ur valuable advice . though smtimes the words r difficult to undstand.
ok sir i stay on 6 th floor as mentioned before and the flat down to me got sm leackage problem, nthg is driping just a wet patch and the female is a commitee member so making an issue out of it by dialy coming n asking to repair, my bathroom leackage is thr, just a patch as said before, nw we called a person to get quotation and that guy will just take one flooring in the bathroom and do work put cement frm inside so he is asking 2000 rs(pipe is nt spoiled or damage ), secretary came and ask us to pay , we told them that thr should b two parts so ask that down flat owner to pay half and we will pay half, bt secretar refused said, "no it has to be bear by us, they have decided in d meeting".(MEETING HELD BY COMMITEE MEMBERS) bt i want to knw wht is the rule or law i dnt trust secretARY they make law and change it according to thr convinent.let me also tell u we have nt dne any any renovation nw in (BATHROOM)one yr, ya i agree we put new flooring bt that ws done 3 yrs back and WE HAVE NOT REMOVED OLD FLOORING WE HAVE PUT NEW FLOORING ON THE OLD JUST TO AVIOD THIS THG, SO PLS GUIDE DO I HAVE TO PAY ALL CHARGE OR TWO PARTS HAVE TO BE DONE ?
THIS PEOPLE R HAVING GROUP ,COMMITTE MEMBER THEY R SAME FRM LAST 17 YRS SO I DNT TRUST THEM AT ALL. WT IS THE LAW ?
I AM OK TO PAY ENTIRE AMT IF U SAY . BT I DNT LIKE IF PEOPLE TRY TO CHEAT OR FOOL . SO DO GUIDE ME , AND HELP ME AGAIN WTH UR VALUABLE SUGGESTION, LAWYERS CLUB IS A HOPE FOR PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO R TOTALLY NOT AWARE OF LAWS ,OTHER TRY TO MISGUIDE US.
MAY GOD BLESS ALL EXPERTS .FROM BOTTOM OF MY HEART I WISH U ALL D HAPPINESS , THANX
Shan
28 October 2010 at 10:36
Can secretory file a suit as one of the defendant along with other members of the society against the same society. ...... under what provision of law........kindly reply.
nikhil
27 October 2010 at 20:24
plz tell me legal status of partership deed on palne paper.(not registered or non stamp)
can any member compel to give money back in case he want to discontinues his business with others( in withrawal)
Anonymous
27 October 2010 at 19:23
Dear Sir/Madam
Sir, My name is J. Srinivas as i am practising as junior advocate. Sir, i have doubt regarding GPA (General Power of Attorny),if the person has given GPA to another person for the period of 5 years and if he wants to cancel that GPA, what will be the process to cancel the GPA. If the GPA owner is not willing to cancel that, what the steps i need to follow the for cancellation of that particular GPA.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Partition suit
x filed a suit for partition suit against four brothers. another 3 people were added as a party as necessary party to the suit. The four brothers appeared but failed to file written statements. No. 5 and 6 conducted the matters and court rejected the suit against them on the point of limitation. defendant no.7 failed to appear and accordingly the court further proceeded Ex-party. The court neither allowed suit or dismissed suit against deft. no. 7 In judgement the court is silent about dismissal or allowed of suit against deft. no. 7. During the trial the deft. 7 died and due to lack of knowledge of the said fact the LRs of no.7 were not brought on record. In execution of the said decree the defendent no. 1 to 4 raised the query and the concerned judge said that decree against the dead person is null and void and it is against all defendents. And ask to take steps. I am confused? What is effect of death of deft. no. 7 to my execution. what remedy is available with me to correct the error? please guide me