SSng Aulakh
02 November 2010 at 21:05
Message :
Why officials and officers of the Courts should not be held answerable, who delibrately delay justice using illegal tactics ?
They needs severe punishment for wasting valuable time of the Hon'ble Courts, which costs to the nation appox @ Rs. 8000/- a minute.
Anonymous
02 November 2010 at 20:59
what is judicial stamp paper and non judicial
stamp paper? what is the difference also?
Anonymous
02 November 2010 at 19:44
Dear Sir/Madam
Sir, my name is J. Srinivas, i recently completed my LLB graduation now i am practicing as a junior Advocate in Hyderabad. Sir, i have doubt regarding I.P.C. 1860 sec 351 assault. Sir, one of my friend's father who works in railways he is the office superindent and he look after all the accounts in his particular section. On 23/09/2010, he was doing his routine work, at that time, he found some diesel money was misued by the driver. That driver is also an central government employee and he called him asked about the misused money at that time driver was assaulted with OS. He went to superior officer to give complaint, but nobody is ready to take complaint against him coz he is the mazdoor union leader. So, my client has requested me to send a legal notice to his superior officer against the driver so that they can take action against him. He is not ready to file a FIR against him due to security problems. Sir, please guide me how to proceed further to take action against him. My client want him to get punished with no effect with his job. If u have any template regarding his assault please forward me.
With Warm Regards
J. Srinivas M.s.c LLB (LLM)
Dr.Chandran Peechulli
02 November 2010 at 19:13
Respected Expert Mr.Shashikumar Sir,
It is not that I expect my case to move like electrical system during the surge of electronics development age. Please try to understand that the expression of ex-serviceman and senior citizen made is to state that an ex-serviceman has once come forward to serve the nation and it is the locals of Bangalore seen as the sons of the soil in my case. As I have purchased 2 plots for my two sons in 1983, from the 30 sites layout formed in 1983. Rest 28 plot owners who purchased from the 30 plots site layout are not disturbed or made a party in the partition case O.S.341/2004. When I was to file a suit against the accused, my suit was put pending, asking me to submit all the original land documents for which, I was shunted to Chennai from Bangalore and back for completeness of originals to be surrendered, for accepting the suit and during the process my case was late numbered, original suit 365/2004, in the meanwhile a partition suit (O.S.341/2004.) was filed by the accused, making me only a party as respondents along with their elder brothers (signatories in the irrevocable GPA) of that time (1983) exclusive of the other purchasers of my time, just because I am a resident of Chennai and the rest (28 plot owners were local Bangalore residents). Liberal adjournments since 2004, necessitating my being shunted to Bangalore from Chennai and back. I hope this is not a small period, if one puts himself in my place and being harassed and humiliated unwantedly by the accused who took law into their hands, forcefully entering into my plot and pulling out the erected stone-pillars connected with barbed wires around the site and putting up a katcha shed overnight and black-mailing me. It took though 7 days to obtain a F.I.R. from local jurisdictional Police Station, after reporting the issue to C.O.P. who directed me to S.P and I.G.P(Bangalore Rural)and after IGP advising me to seek solution from the court of law, this exercise started(2004) and still awaiting justice. Justice makes no mention for the accused who took law into their hands but the case being dismissed in Bangalore City Civil Court i.e. O.S.365/2004 & R.A.117/2009. Fast Track Court 2. During the pendency of the case, despite “Status Quo” the accused went ahead modifying the katcha-shed to a home for living.
In fact, it has electrified me after putting in my best of efforts, time and money, during the last seven long years. Is it not encouraging the criminals to grow in society seeking easy and fast money. One of the advocates in Bangalore were saying that they exist because of their existence. This is the poor state of affairs in a learned society. WHEN ALL THIS COULD HAVE BEEN NIPPED-UP, INITIALLY IF LAW & ORDER WAS AFFECTIVE.
Hence, I needed the expert advices Sir. Thank you very much.
Dr.ChandranPeechulli,Ph.D;FIE;
Sunlawseeker
02 November 2010 at 15:52
My client has taken an house for lease for 11 months. He paid One lakh as Lease amount.
But, in the lease agreement, the lessor mentioned that the lease amount would be given after leasing the house to another lessee.
Thereafter, My client received an "On-Demand" in a Rs.20 NJSP.
My client want to vacate the house now. But, the lessor is non intended to return the lease amount.
Query:
Dear experts, Whether my client vacate or not the house to file a money suit?
Or
Any other remedy to redeem the lease amount?
Kindly reply.
Thanking you
regards
V.Sundaresan,
Advocate.
Anonymous
02 November 2010 at 11:10
What is the difference between the Void cotract and illegal contract with the example.
Anonymous
02 November 2010 at 01:40
Respected Experts,
A schedule caste family share boundary of land, he has encroached my around 200sqft of land. Some says that there is no use in fighting suit with a schedule caste, as generally court favors them only. Also u may land up in trouble.
So, plz suggest me that is it like that or court used to be biased?
does law favours them everywhere?
Do courts keep soft attitude towards them?
Plz guide or suggest me.
Thanks and regards.
Anonymous
02 November 2010 at 01:28
Respected Experts,
A partition suit is going on between A B C D, here C is plaintiff, and rest r defendants. They had a family arrangement (unregistered and unmutated) to look after the property and the most complicated property was assigned to most able member i.e. to D. After 9 yrs of the family arrangement C started pressing others to accept it as memorandum of partition and to finalize it since the property assigned to C to look after becomes very valuable one. But others did not agree upon. So to validate that family arrangement from the court, C brought that partition suit. Two years after bringing the suit, everyone pressed/consented to D to sell a most litigated property at throwaway price and the property sold by D. But the D felt cheated and filed in the written statement that the property sold can be deducted from my share. Even D also ready to share the consideration amount with others, but no one is agree to accept it.
A and D wants fresh partition based on value of the properties. Trial is going on and is in evidence stage, C and A has completed their deposition.
Now the questions are -
• Will the court validate the existing family arrangement?
• Is fresh partition based on value of the properties possible?
• What will the impact of selling of the property by D on the suit?
• What step or plea D should take here to get fresh partition done, since we have heard that disposal of any property independently in personal capacity is sufficient proof of partition?
• Should D file the documents which shows that how litigated property that was and he alone has fought the suit related with that property to save it.
Plz guide or suggest me.
Thanks and regards.
Kannan Kandasamy
02 November 2010 at 01:20
Dear Experts
I heard that there is a way to do Partition without going to Court.
That is doing the Partition through the Collector and/or Dashildar?
Is there any option like that ?
If yes, then how to proceed in that regard?
Any advice/idea/help in this regard will be very much helpful to me & our family & especially to my Mummy who is running an Old Aged Home free of cost through her Pension.
Expecting your reply
TanQ
K.Kannan
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
C.P.C.
"whether the High Court may interfere with the conclusion arrived by the both the courts below (Trial Court as well as district Appeallate Court) on question of finding of Facts (concurrent finding of courts below) which is based on Affidavits under Article 226 (not 227) writ of certorari only and quash judgment of courts below in summary proceeding matter.(Is there any provision under C.P.C.?)
If YES, then any citation of Apex Court?