seetharaman
06 November 2010 at 21:44
Respected sir
I appeared for respondent in a injunction petition. I have successfully vacated the injunction order. Now the petitioner is filing a second petition seeking for temporary injunction till the preference of appeal. whether such a petition is maintainable. provision of law quoted by petitioner is order 39; rule 2(1) and section 94(e) of c.p.c.
yogesh
06 November 2010 at 15:06
Prior to year 2000 there was compulsory 1 year apprenticeship program for enrolment of advocates after LL.B degree and there was 3 years mandatory experience at Bar for appearing for Judiciary service examination but was deleted by the Apex Court and gives direction to the Bar council to make amendments.Please specify the citations or details of the order/Judgment has been passed
yogesh
06 November 2010 at 14:59
In news and same issue has been raised some years ago that Bar council of India have given directions to the Universities to shut down the evening LL.B course as It will de standardized the education as the most of the learners are already engaged in some other profession and was not serious in making the career as advocates as they wants just the degree to for their career avenues and want the white collar jobs
Kindly comment
Anonymous
06 November 2010 at 14:00
My father expired recently leaving Rs 2.00 Lakhs in his fixed Deposit and saving account. He has not made any nomination and he has 5 children.
3 Sons (A,B and C)
2 Daughter (D, E)
A is having 2 sons(A1 and A2)
B is having 2 sons (B1 and B2)
C is having 1 son and 1 daughter (C1 and C2)
D is having 3 sons
E is having 1 son and 1 daughter
but B, C and D were expired long back.
We are HINDU's
Now if A(my self) want to take consent letter from who all ?
and what are all other documents to produce to get the money from bank ?
Please answer my two queries.
Anonymous
06 November 2010 at 13:49
First of all Happy Diwali to all honorable experts! Sirs, my wife abuses me and my relatives at our faces. Can I go for divorce on the basis of cruelty? If yes, then How much time the whole proceeding will take and How much will it cost to me?? What kind of evidences I shall have to produce before the court to prove "cruelty". Pls guide me.
ess
06 November 2010 at 07:44
What is the difference between Written Statement and Reply to an application.
ess
05 November 2010 at 21:24
1. When is verfication required on documents\replies filed in the court.
2. Is verification still required when affidavit is being given.
3. Is verfication or affidavit required to be given when the reply contains only expression of opinion on law point.
That in the suit for partition one of the plaintiff is residing at Toronto (Canada),The defendant had asked the said plaintiff through E-Mail whether he had filed any suit for partition against the defendant, the plaintiff reply that NO he didn’t.Now the case is fixed for Written Statement
What remedy for me (Defendant)
Whether to file the application for rejection of plaint on the basis of that E-mail.
Pls guide if any so that the suit can be rejected with heavy cost.
Anonymous
04 November 2010 at 14:09
I have the defect in the S.L.P(Special Leave Petition) filed before the S.C
The Modified Check list of the SC points 12 speaks
"Whether the addresses of the parties and their representation are
complete and set out properly and whether detailed cause title has
been mentioned in the impugned judgment and if not, whether the
memo of parties has been filed, if required?"
The Impugned Judgment of the H.C against which the S.L.P have not complete address of the parties and I have the copy of the writ petition which the respondents has attached the memo of parties in which I was the Respondent
My query is as per the Point 12 above speaks, whether I have to attach the new memo of parties in which I am the Petitioner or I have to attach the copy of the memo filed by the Respondent in H.C (In which I was the respondent) with the Impugned Judgment?
Voice Expert
I have filed a suit for specific performance .The other side has taken a defence that the contract is hit by undue influence, coercion, misrepresentation..etc. The defendant in an telephonic conversation has admitted the contract and has postponed the date of execution of the document. My client has recorded the same in the CD and now the same has to be tested with the voice expert before the court of law. I want to have the address of an voice expert in Tamil Nadu and who could depose before the court by giving evidence.