Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

sandeep R.N   30 December 2010 at 07:17

contributory negligence

pls give more about contributory negligence

Anonymous   30 December 2010 at 02:09

stay of suit

sir, a property owner file a suit for permanent injunction against a person for not to disturb the peaceful enjoyment of the property and the suit is pending before the court of law. Meanwhile he pleadge the property document in a bank and then after lapse of two years the bank will seized the property under surfaeci Act.The bank also auctioned and sale the property to one of the auction bidder. now what is the position of the case. whether the case is dismissed? or the purchaser can conduct the suit and whether the defendant have any rights to conduct the case evethough the property was auctioned by the bank?please advice me in favour of the purchaser Or auction bidder and give some related authorities....

Anonymous   30 December 2010 at 02:07

stay of suit

sir, a property owner file a suit for permanent injunction against a person for not to disturb the peaceful enjoyment of the property and the suit is pending before the court of law. Meanwhile he pleadge the property document in a bank and then after lapse of two years the bank will seized the property under surfaeci Act.The bank also auctioned and sale the property to one of the auction bidder. now what is the position of the case. whether the case is dismissed? or the purchaser can conduct the suit and whether the defendant have any rights to conduct the case evethough the property was auctioned by the bank?please advice me in favour of the purchaser Or auction bidder and give some related authorities....

Anonymous   29 December 2010 at 23:39

Which suit is better

Learned Advocates,

For removal of the encroached portion of the land by the neighbor, when the right, Title and possession of the land has been established by the competent court as back in 1969 in another suit. The owner of the land is true owner has valid registered sale deed.
Which option is better S. 6 of specific relief act or Regular civil/Title suit for recovery of possession?
What about the appeal by plaintiff and defendants, whoever loses the suit?
Is the plaint differs in specific relief act from Regular civil/Title suit for recovery of possession?
What is the course of action of S. 6 of specific relief act?
How the decree will be executed?

Please enlighten.
I have been advised differently by different lawyers, so I am asking. Your effort is highly appreciable.
Thanks and regards.

Anonymous   29 December 2010 at 23:24

Whether contempt Petition is mainataianble?

Dear Sir,
My query is in regards to service law
I have filed the contempt Petition in regards to non implementation of the order passed by the CAT which has directed the respondent to regularise my services in Feb 2010 The Respondent has blocked my salary in July 2010 and I filed the Miscallneous Application. The CAT has given one week time to file the reply and on 22/09/2010 the Respondent submitted that they will disburse the salary with in 2 days and will file the Writ Petition before the High Court. The High Court has set referred back for reconsideration on 05/10/2010. The CAT ON 07/10/2010 has to close the contempt Petition and the matter is still pending there
The respondent neither has released the salary but has terminated my services without serving me the copy of the order in 30/11/2010. I have filed the fresh Petition against the termination which is admitted and issued notices to the respondent

My query is there That the respondent has given false submission before the court that they will disburse the salary within 2 days and the CAT HAS PASSED AN ORDER ON 22/09/2010 and the fact is that I have still not received the salary and the employer has terminated my adhoc services whether the contempt Petition is maintainable in such circumstances ?

Alok Tholiya   29 December 2010 at 22:47

Pl. advise

1. I want a honest advocate ( who will be dedicated and will not get sold out to opposite party which is very common) for city civil court Bandra.
2.If I have filed first appeal under RTI and appellate commissioner summons me then is it necessary for me to attend? I have made my grivance very clear and there was no need to call me.
3.My grand father had kept a person as manager for his lodging house.And had allotted him a room of 50 sq ft as rest room. Now he has sublet that room to some one known as Bhati.Bhati does not have any documents on him. Still he has obtained power connection in his name through fraudelant means. I have repeatedly written to Reliance Energy for having given a connection to unauthorised tresspasser. What options I have against Mr Bhati and Rel energy?

Anonymous   29 December 2010 at 20:19

Non-accptance of Reg. Letter


Dear Sirs,

I have sent two letters by Registered AD to one of my family member for some property which is under dispute. However, he has not accepted any letter and both the letters has returned undelivered. What is the alternative available to me in this case?

Thanking you.

Member (Account Deleted)   29 December 2010 at 19:28

bar for criminal petition

1.Sir, if I loose a civil service case in high court and it involves a criminal part ,which was neither considered nor decided in that case and never filed before criminal court, then, can I still file a criminal writ petition praying a writ for prohibition of victimisation and action against erring officials?

2.Is there any bar against such petition if victimisation includes discontinuance of my services also, which was issue under service petition?

3.Can court still take action against erring officials in criminal petition with or without considering discontinuance of services?

K K Singh   29 December 2010 at 17:36

Remedy for delaying the possession or exceeding the time of possession by a builder

Dear Sir,

I have purchased a residential plot offered by Vatika Group in 2005 in Jaipur and paid 95% of the agreement value by August 2006. The company sent a buyer agreement for signing in October 2007, which I signed in compulsion after going through the contents I found the same one sided, but I have no option but to sign otherwise, the builder would deduct 25% of the paid amount. I suffered due to paying the installments in advance, while they have changed my plot number, and now wanting me to approve the same. I felt cheated as they have done it through a legal document but fraudulently.
I now want them to return the money with interest as still they have not received any approval, neither they have shown us any approved plan.

Regards,

K K Singh,
9818075150

Anonymous   29 December 2010 at 17:22

Constructive res-judicata

What is constructive res-judicata?