Anonymous
19 February 2011 at 15:15
Can my lawyer file a Caveat on my behalf in my absence? Will I be required to give him power of attorney?
Anonymous
19 February 2011 at 14:21
sir, I a computer centre witha partner who sold it out and went abroad . I filed a case and won it when i filed the case the computers of the centre was taken over by a third party on kychit . Now in EP stage he is he has handed over only some computers rest he has sold it out . can I file a criminal case against the person who has take this items on kychit
yogesh
19 February 2011 at 13:51
Experts
I need information if Govt health practioiner practice outside the office hours and recommends products of compnay and company deliver cuts/commission on the same Please inform whether the cut/commission demanded outside the official duties and during its practice is part of corruption under section 7 of prevention of corruption act?
Legal Fighter
19 February 2011 at 12:30
Hi All,
In execution proceedings u/s 25 of Consumer Protection Act, final order was passed and matter sent to Deputy Commissioner for recovery. Now the DC office has sent the matter back to consumer court stating that properties are not in the name of Judgment Debtor company but are in names of Directors so can't be attached.
What option I have? How can I get to know the proterty in name of the company? The directors may have already disposed of all the company assets. What should I do?
Anonymous
19 February 2011 at 09:31
I am a retired person with no income and need a lawyer based in Andheri to help me retrive the money of my late father from the culprits by filing cases / petions in courts at a reasonable charges. I am un avble to pay huge amount being asked for by the lawyers but I am willing to share certain %age of money recovered with them due to help extended. The amount may run in to more than 60Lacs towards my share. Pl. consider and revert.
Member (Account Deleted)
19 February 2011 at 07:12
Whether a lunatic/unsound mind by birth (now 23 yr old)
1. Can get Votters ID?
2. can get a passport?
3. can open bank account through the guardian?
Sudhin2218
19 February 2011 at 01:50
We've a joint property and it was jointly registered in the name of my grandmother (father's mother) and my father’s name,after my father passed away in 1991, my mother became joint owner with my grandmother, In 2004 my grandmother (my grand mother was not in possession) sold the half of the joint property to stranger (not belongs my Hindu family) , there was no partition deed made between my mother and grand mother,
so we filed the suit for an injunction and Sr division court granted injunction in favor of us. Then stranger filed suite for partition in 2006, Now we came to know there is a provision in "Section 4(1) in The Partition Act, 1893
Where a share of a dwelling- house belonging to an undivided family has been transferred to a person who is not a member of such family and such transferee sues for partition, the Court shall, if any member of the family being a shareholder shall undertake to buy the share of such transferee, make a valuation of such share in such manner as it thinks fit and direct the sale of such share to such shareholder, and may give all necessary and proper directions in that behalf."
Question 1: My mother or my sister is ready to buy the share of such transferee, so please let me know are there any Good Supreme Court or Karnataka High Court Judegement Citations, which can strongly support “Section 4(1) in The Partition Act, 1893” ?
Question 2: Do we need request H’ble Judge to refer this case to Lok adalat based on “Section 4(1) in The Partition Act, 1893”?
Anonymous
18 February 2011 at 23:44
Sir,
I filed a contempt case against the ACP (TP) and the Zonal Commissoner of GHMC for not acting on the orders of the Honourable High Court of AP for stopping further construction of an unauthorized constructon being made in the common area of our apartment.
The ACP (TP) who has also represented the Zonal Commissioner, in his counter affadavit filed in reply to the conempt case before the Honourable High Court of AP sateted that the open balony where the illegal construction is carried is only by the party who has been constructing the structure and nobody in the apartment including the peitioner is using the same.
My question is, how can the ACP (TP) tell who is using which part of the common area in the flats? Even if one does not use a particuar portion of the common area, do the other residents loose their right to it?
He also stated after reciving the complaint from some of the residents it issued a notice under section 452 of HMC act,1955 to the party on 9-2-2010 for stopping the iternal construction work i.e., closing of open balcony even prior to the orders ofthe Honurable High Court of AP on 5th March 2010 and stopped the construction.
The party applied for regulariastion of the construction made by them on 4th March 2010 wich was rejected by the Corporation.
The ACP (TP) has mislead the Honourable High Court by stating that they have stopped constrution after issuing the party a notice 0n 9-2-2010.
I have been continously reminding them that the construction is still being carried out vide letters addressed to the ACP (TP), Deputy Commissioner and the Zonal commissioner, but they ignored them, but in the counter affadavit stated that they have stopped the construction.
Should these discrepancy in the counter affadavit brought to the notice of the High Court?
He also stated that as the regularisation was rejected the Corporation shall take immedaiate steps for demolition of the unauthorised structure. This was on 5th July 2010 and it is not done so far as the pary has taken a status quo from 3rd Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts.
The status quo has not been vacated yet.
Anonymous
18 February 2011 at 23:40
Sir,
I filed a contempt case against the ACP (TP) and the Zonal Commissoner of GHMC for not acting on the orders of the Honourable High Court of AP for stopping further construction of an unauthorized constructon being made in the common area of our apartment.
The ACP (TP) who has also represented the Zonal Commissioner, in his counter affadavit filed in reply to the conempt case before the Honourable High Court of AP sateted that the open balony where the illegal construction is carried is only by the party who has been constructing the structure and nobody in the apartment including the peitioner is using the same.
My question is, how can the ACP (TP) tell who is using which part of the common area in the flats? Even if one does not use a particuar portion of the common area, do the other residents loose their right to it?
He also stated after reciving the complaint from some of the residents it issued a notice under section 452 of HMC act,1955 to the party on 9-2-2010 for stopping the iternal construction work i.e., closing of open balcony even prior to the orders ofthe Honurable High Court of AP on 5th March 2010 and stopped the construction.
The party applied for regulariastion of the construction made by them on 4th March 2010 wich was rejected by the Corporation.
The ACP (TP) has mislead the Honourable High Court by stating that they have stopped constrution after issuing the party a notice 0n 9-2-2010.
I have been continously reminding them that the construction is still being carried out vide letters addressed to the ACP (TP), Deputy Commissioner and the Zonal commissioner, but they ignored them, but in the counter affadavit stated that they have stopped the construction.
Should these discrepancy in the counter affadavit brought to the notice of the High Court?
He also stated that as the regularisation was rejected the Corporation shall take immedaiate steps for demolition of the unauthorised structure. This was on 5th July 2010 and it is not done so far as the pary has taken a status quo from 3rd Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts.
The status quo has not been vacated yet.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Encroachment
When i was young, my fater sold a land for plot purpose in S.No.459/4, , the plot owner Encroached S.No.459/3, 459/3 was joint property of our family, recently i registered the same into my name. Now, i want to clear this encroachment, what shall i do in this regard? pls advice.
Thanking you in advance for your prompt advice.