Anonymous
29 May 2011 at 10:53
As per the new Judgement of SC on the enhancement of the rent to the current market value for the properties having very low rent (Let out 20-25YRS)I would like to know how to proceed on this .I have a property where tennants are paying very low rent (Rs2000/mth)and fulfil all the criterias as per the SC new judgement.I would like to know (a)Do i give notice to them directly or i approach the court for the implementation.(b)who are the approved valuers who can certify the market rent of my property which court will agree to.(C)Does these guidelines will become the precedence for the lower court to act on and will direct my tennants directly to enhance the rent or my case will be evaluated as other normal cases under rent control and will have lenghty proceedings.
An autonomous body while handing over built house, allotted on rebate, asked the allotte to first purchase a water meter and give reference of meter and get signed certain papers. (may be the allottee will have to pay the water charges) //During possession allottee did not shift there due to lack of facilities and got electricity connection after 5 yrs and simultaneously represented to water auth about non availability of water over the yrs and hence could not utilise the accommodation and now want to utilise the house so take necessary action. Water auth instead of replying issued demand notice in thousands rupees which include penalties also by levelling water charges at the flat rate per month and threat of disconnection by one month. Other residents, staying under compelling circumstances are paying charges says water auth only accept cash payment and not by cheque. Availability of water is one hour in morning.Can the Hon'ble members suggest how to proceed ?
(a) In this case which is the competent court ? Civil or consumer ?
(b)Before moving court is there any need of further representing ? (so far only one communication by the allottee)
(c) there are several flat occupied but not being utilised
(d) Should first ask the water auth to supply the signed papers to allotte under RTI Act or other wise. before it is late and the defunct connection is disconnected
(e) Any suitable advice in the interest of allottee ?
Anonymous
29 May 2011 at 10:16
My mother is the only daughter to my grand parents, she use to have 4 brothers out of which 1 has expired. A plot of near about 2200 sqyrds was self partitioned by all my uncles giving nothing to my mother. Now there is some dispute between my two uncle (maternal) and a suit for partition has been filed by one of them.
What will be the share of my mother in such a property?
My grand parents are dead. One of my uncle is dead. There are four brothers and only one sister.
Plz refer a judgement also to make solution more clear.
Anonymous
28 May 2011 at 22:23
dear sir/mam
can anybody explain me subordinate courts powers, priviliges, and pecuniary jurdiction in india
Member (Account Deleted)
28 May 2011 at 19:08
If 'A' makes will in favour of his brother 'B'. Subsequently 'B' dies before the death of 'A'.
1. What will be the fate of will?
2. If after the death of 'B' , 'A' has never executed any other will or cancelled will in her life time then can legal heirs of 'B' take benefit of that will after the death of 'A''?
How far sec105 Indian succession act is applicable?
saurabh sharma
28 May 2011 at 16:20
i have purchased a property from a person. i paid him the advanced money by cash, and promise him to pay the rest of the money at time of registration. At the time of registration the said seller told me that he was unbale to lacate the original registration copy of the said property and provide me the photostat copy as he promised me to deliever the same as soon as possible. i got the said property registered in my name with sale deed and mutation. 6- 7 months have been passed and i got to know from the sources that the said property has been mortgaged to the bank by the said seller against the loan. the bank has issued a notice in the newspaper that the said property has been subject to auction as the original registration copy is with him and now the property has been auctioned three days before. Now what is the legal remedy available to us and whether we get our property back. whether we institute a civil suit or criminal suit. whether the said seller is liable. and whether we make the bank a party to the case.
Rakesh Sood
28 May 2011 at 09:57
Recently I saw a judgement of SC regarding right of legal heirs to the property of deceased and not that of nominee.
I am unable to relocate the judgment
Seek help of friends.
Regards
Rakesh
Anonymous
28 May 2011 at 06:43
When the Review Petition of a Judgment is pending on account of an error apparent can the Judgment be considered to be final?
Can the employee be imposed upon the major penalty of compulsory retirement from service during the pendency of the said Review Petition?
What could be the impact once after the imposition of such a major penalty the Court delivers the Judgment on the Review Petition invoking the inherent powers of the Court to do justice that there was an error apparent which needed to be clarified to do justice between the parties?
Any case Laws ?
Model rent judgement
As per the new Judgement of SC on the enhancement of the rent to the current market value for the properties having very low rent (Let out 20-25YRS)I would like to know how to proceed on this .I have a property where tennants are paying very low rent (Rs2000/mth)and fulfil all the criteria's as per the SC new judgement.I would like to know (a)Do i give notice to them directly or i approach the court for the implementation.(b)who are the approved valuers who can certify the market rent of my property which court will agree to.(C)Does these guidelines will becomes the precedence for the lower court to act on and court will direct my tennants directly to enhance the rent or my case will be evaluated as other normal cases under rent control and will have lengthy proceedings.