Anonymous
30 June 2011 at 11:38
Respected sir ,
we are the public limited company we have made a leave & licence agreement with A for running canteen for benifit & use of our employees the term of agreement is one yrs only .we have received various complaints from the employees union for not providing quality food .so we have issued aletter to canteen holder A that as the leave & licence agreement expires you need to vacate the premises after thathe(canteen holder)approch to the civil court for declaration & permanant injunction The Hon'ble civil court please to pass the order the "Defendant is hereby permanantly restraint from taking forcible possession of the suit premises without following due process of law now my question is WHAT IS DUE PROCESS OF LAW?
Thanks in advance &Have a good day
Anonymous
30 June 2011 at 09:11
Hi,
I have the following questions regarding recover suit:
1) Can we ask for attachment of a property?
2) Can we ask for surity?
3) Can we ask for both 1 and 2 or only one of these?
4) If the property requested for attachment has less reg market value compared to suit claim, then can the court give attachment on this property?
Thanks in advance.
yaralung@gmail.com
30 June 2011 at 00:04
I want to know what remedy a client has if his counsel fails to provide the full evidence to the trial court which has been provided by the client to the counsel. If counsel does not appear on the given dates? Does not raise the question on the perjury by the other side; takes full money for depositing the stamp duty in the court but deposits much lesser? All this lead to the decision ex parte and against the client. Due to this the client changes two counsel. In the appeal court at District level, his contention under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC is rejected. How a client, who is common man expected to know the technicalities of law, what to do when? What can he do more than arranging the timely payment of fee and expenses demanded by the counsel and providing all the evidences to the counsel?
Anonymous
29 June 2011 at 16:53
I AM A STUDENT OF LAW, I CAME ACROSS THIS PROBLEM SO NEED HELP
The Problem:-
The companies A and B are in business with each other. During the course of their business a Company C takes over the company A. Now, the dissolved company A had been in some business transaction with B and the payment was due at the time of dissolution.
The new company C now has to pay it.
MY QUESTION IS THAT COMPANY C HAS TO MAKE AN INDEMNITY BOND ABOUT THE DUE PAYMENT.
WHAT SHOULD BE THE CLAUSES THAT SHOULD BE MENTIONED IN THE DRAFT???
Anonymous
29 June 2011 at 16:13
Legal position..... whether person is dead or live....
1-THE PERSON IS NOT TRACEABLE FROM LAST SEVEN YEARS.
2-NO BODOY HAVE SEEN / HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT THE PERSON
3-FIR
4-NOTICE IN ATLEAST TWO LEADING NEWS PAPERS
Section 108 of the Evidence Act.
- Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven years. -
Provided that when the question is whether a man is alive or dead, and it is proved that he has not been heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him if he had been alive, the burden of proving that he is alive is shifted to the person who affirms it.
Note- Man declared dead after seven years as per evidence Act.
Now my query is What happened after 8 years – no news, not heard and he one fine morning traced and found alive.
Is he dead or alive.
If he is alive then what will be the status during not seen or heard and thus declared dead by Court.
Anonymous
29 June 2011 at 15:27
can i file a civil summary suit for recovery of money without present cheque.
B Guru Murthy
29 June 2011 at 15:23
Dear Ld Members,
I gave a complaint against my FIL for violating APCS(Conduct)Rules 1964 as there is no response I filed RTI it was deemed refusal on the PIO, so complaint filed pending in APIC
Que’n:
Can anyone[other than me] give a complaint against Public Servant [School Asst] who violated A.P.C.S.(Conduct) Rules 1964 enclosing of 498a case C.S/L.W.Statements/Memo/FIR/Complaint Copy which states that he himself Violated Rules i.e. giving dowry, abetting while giving dowry, spending more than 1,00,000 in a year.
Doubt:
Would there be any consequences against them [the one who filed a complaint] for filing a complaint against FIL to his office.
Any advices
anantha madhav
29 June 2011 at 13:43
Dear Forum members,
I had filed RTI on my FIL who had filed 498a case through his daughter. I didnt get any reply 4 my RTI, but the complaint against PIO is pending before SIC.
In reply to that he wrote a letter to my Office that a criminal [498a] case and civil [divorce/maintenance] suits were pending against me in the court of Law and misusing RTI.
After this complaint my Office superirors called me and asked me to settle the matters immediately in 6 months or else my job would be in trouble.
Still nothing has been settled, further company asked me to leave the job.
Did he violate my Human Rights by writing a letter to my office only for filing RTI against him, If so, can i file any civil suit [tort] against him.
Please suggest any valuable solutions.
Anonymous
29 June 2011 at 13:35
Sir,
A has 4 children, B C D E, D is a son and B C E are the Daughter. B has been married in 1980 and E has married in 1990, C has married in 1997. All are married before the death of A. Is C have right in the property share as per karnataka amend ment act 1994. The proeprtys already transfer to name of D in 2004 & he also sold some property in 2005.
Please answer.
Thank u
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Civl natham land
Property situated at Tamilnadu
Natham nilavary thitta udavi Aluvalr given patta for my client to 510 sq. mts. dated 17.01.1997.
But opposite party with counsel says that the above officer is not entitled to given patta for natam land extent of 510 sq.mts. The above officer is entitled or not to given patta to my client? My client patta is valid or not.?