Anonymous
14 July 2011 at 19:08
Facts of case(Which are relevant to previous query in similar situated condition)
An employee working xxx institute on contractual basis has participated in the selection process in year 2002 against 2 posts he was placed in waiting list as Number-2. (THE RESULT WAS NOT DECLARED/NOTIFIED) Subsequently one post was created and the waiting List No-1 was given appointment against the post. The selected candidate No-1 has left for Australia by resigning from post with in 6 months from date of joining and by rules he should be given appointment but was not considered and denied ( maybe he has no nexus with the administration for favor). Moreover he was not aware about the status of the result
Subsequently one post has been filled by backdoor in year 2006, The employee now filed the RTI in year 2007 and shocked to learn that he was denied appointment despite of being placed in the panel which was vogue in year 2002 when the vacancy was created.
On the basis of information collected, he made his representation which was dismissed in year 2008.Then he approached to CAT which was allowed in year 2010 by directing the employer to regularize his services from the date of accrual of vacancy when the selected candidate No-1 was resined
The employer refused to comply the order and the contempt petition was filed against him. The employer moves to the High Court on the grounds of Limitation which was remanded back to CAT
The employee contention before the CAT that since result was not declared so there was no mean to know about the status of result. The CAT ordered and issued direction whether the result was notified or declared for deciding the PLEA OF Limitation raised by the employer
The Hon’ble judge retired and new hon’ble bench constituted and made an order that though result was not declared it would not solve the riddle of Limitation for not filing the RTI in year 2002 and dismissed the Application
The employee filed the Review Petition before the bench with the ground that RTI Act was not operation in year 2002 but it again will not impress the bench
Whether such employee can make an appeal u/s 17 of Limitation Act which clearly states that fraud nullifies everything and the period of Limitation shall not be reckoned till discovery of fraud
Kindly advise
Anonymous
14 July 2011 at 18:02
My Wife Filed Ex Parte Divorce Case against me on 26-10-2010. After that i m not attand any hearing of court. I m received the notice of court that if you are not coming on 25/5/2011 in the court you are ex parte. But not i m checking on the internet court is give me next date 7/7/2011 and after this date next date is 16/8/2011. I want to know how much time left for divorce. Please help me.
Vikas
8427844450
B.Chakrapani Warrier
14 July 2011 at 17:15
Mr A, Hindu ,died intestate leaving an inherited immovable property. He is survived by his wife, Ms. B and two major son's, viz., Mr.C and Mr.D. Mr.C is married and have a son. Mr. D expired leaving behind his divorced wife and a major son. How the right of the parties are to be determined. Request to give your considered answer.
N.J. MISHRA
14 July 2011 at 15:49
CAN P.F. INSPECTION CAN BE DONE BY ANY REGIONAL E.S.I. INPECTOR. WHETHER E.S.I. INSPECTOR FROM DELHI CAN ASK THE COMPANY BRANCH IN DELHI THAT HE WANTS TO VERIFY ALL DOCUMENTS THAT ARE MANIAINED IN HEAD OFFICE, SAY CHENNAI.
PLEASE MEMBER KINLDY GUIDE ME.
Anonymous
14 July 2011 at 11:56
dear,i have a commercial place at 2 floor 322 sqfeet in mumbai, n now it is redeveloping, after 3 years landlord told me that now we are going to give you 400 sqfeet n u have 2 pay for 78 sqfeet, per sqfeet 20,000=00 around 15lacs carpet area or we will pay u 17000=00 per sqfeet, before they sold at rate 6500=00 per sqfeet buildup area;its being for 35 floor n now they have completed 29 floor, they told me it will take 1 year more,please help
Mahesh
14 July 2011 at 11:04
My Mother is living in a rajouri garden from the last 22yrs every month she is paying rent on time.Basically we are from bangalore but settled in Delhi. now suddenly owner came n asking her to vacate the house or increase the rent by 30% in every 2 years we were increasing the rent as per the discussion before taking the house. I asked the owner if you wanna sell it out then sell it to us only because its been a 22years now. I am staying in different place.
Please Suggest me what to do.?
Anonymous
14 July 2011 at 10:09
My friend was allotted an advocate for filing writ in HC, by legal service committee. Advocate delayed it for one year and then filed very diluted writ, to favour govt officers who violated fundamental rights of my friend and his family members. At friend's instance another advocate was allotted, but he too is not willing to contest as he thinks he is not capable to handle such writ. He has no adequate knowledge of such writs involving breach of fundamental rights etc.It appear govt officers, out of fear of being punished, are trying to influence advocates to dissuade my friend to drop the issue at all. What is the remedy for my friend?
Anonymous
14 July 2011 at 09:57
All the esteem legal experts,please help me in this matter,I will be highly obliged to all of you.
What is succession certificate.
Which court does issue the succession certificate and to whom it is given ?
Does it contains only the applicant (legal) heir's name or names of all the legal heirs ?.
binukokkad
14 July 2011 at 07:12
plaintiff filed a suit for partition of property. As per title deed extend of property is 5 acre 34 cents only. but the plaintiff mistakenly mention in the schedule of the property in the plaint as 6 acre 20 cents. munsiff court passed a preliminary decree. defendant filed 1 st appeal before sub court against the decree. 1 st appeal dismissed holding the findings of lower court. defendants proffered an appeal before the high court. admission rejected. the plaintiff filed a final decree application before the munsiff court. an adv.commission appointed to measure the property and effect the partition asper p.decree. adv. commoner surveyed the property as per p.decree and submitted his report. case posted to hearing on the final decree application. only at that point of time the defendants noted that the error occurred in the p.decree as well as mistakes in the plaint schedule. can this error be correct?, what steps to be taken by def?, what we do next? please give advice to sole this problem. we are for defendants in this matter
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
appeal lies to which court
Miscellaneous petition was filed before the principle judge junior division, Mangalore, Karnataka under order 9 rule 14 read with section 141 of civil proceedure code for setting aside of the partition suit which was compromised under order 23 I am a stranger to that suit. My miscellaneous petition was rejected on the ground of maintainability. Which court does the appeal lies under what provision?