Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 06:23
Yesterday my case against Airtel was not received by the District Consumer Forum, Chennai South, stating that there is a recent ruling that cases against Airtel should not be accepted and it has to be filed only in the civil court.
Can any body give me the copy of such ruling.
Any body facing similar problem
Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 01:15
DEAR SIR
I WANT TO KNOW ABOUT APPEAL AGAINST ARBITRAL AWARD U/S 34/37 KINDLY TELL ME ABOUT THE SAME
Anonymous
19 July 2011 at 01:14
DEAR SIR
I WANT TO KNOW ABOUT APPEAL AGAINST ARBITRAL AWARD U/S 34/37 KINDLY TELL ME ABOUT THE SAME
Manjeet kumar sahu
18 July 2011 at 22:31
whether Past consideration could be vaild in any case.
Anonymous
18 July 2011 at 21:17
Respected sir,
In our 4storied building contains 12 flat
lift is not working since 6 months.after
repeated reminder by the flatowners the pramukh& mantri of the building fund management committee is not acting on the
complaints & they have not renewed the lift
licencealso.should we the flatowners report to
the lift inspectors or whatelse can be done?
Regards.
dev
18 July 2011 at 20:44
iam going to purchase a patta land which is issued in the year 1985 shall i purchase tell me plz
Anonymous
18 July 2011 at 20:14
sir,
my father got one properties from court order
before 20 years back.we have no original documents. my father only having court judgment copy.
still my father not registered in registration departments.
pls give the procedure for registration
anshul sangal
18 July 2011 at 19:07
sir my question is when under order 9 rule 13 C.P.C an application has been moved by defendent to set aside ex party decree and that application is decided by court on merit against defendent then what remedy is avaiable for defendent ?
Ria
18 July 2011 at 17:38
Respected Experts,
I have received an Exparte Order in my favor against the defendant. In which I have been granted a sum as costs of litigation and damages.
Also I have been granted police assistance.
Kindly direct as to how should I execute this Exparte Order.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Easement by prescription
I was using a road under easement by prescription for last 27 years. I have filed a suit for easement in 2007. the muciff court found that i am eligible for easement but since the width is not proved by survey plan ,it is dismissed by him.
subsequently i have filed An appeal before the District court and District court also dissmissed the appeal not on the grounds of the Munciff but on his finding that the easement should be available only if it is used for 22 years
In his order he specifically stated that survey plan is not required for easement
My question is
whether the District Judge is Right in holding that 22 years is required for the Easement by prescription
In sec. 15 of easement act it is stated that " each of the said periods of 20 years Shall be taken to be period ending with in 2 years next before the institution of the suit, ehere the claim to such period relates is conested"
What does it mean
kindly clarify me