Anonymous
02 August 2011 at 14:57
Dear Experts,
What is mean by joint family property ?
Tks
Anonymous
02 August 2011 at 13:07
Dear Sir,
I have filed a suit under above section against a party 2 years back still the case is going for amt of Rs.40000/- .
My question
1) Can I claim Intrest & Incidental Charges( Adv Fees) in addition to principal for such delay? ( Amt was given handloan through Chq)
2) what are additional privilages under civil & Criminal which I can take action against the party?
Please Specify with relevant Sections.
Anonymous
02 August 2011 at 12:10
i filed two affidavits before the high court and in one affidavit i mentioned i had received notice from the authority and another that i had not received . this was purely by mistake and there was no intention to mislead the court can you tell me how do i remedy the same.sometimes judges take these seriously
Anonymous
02 August 2011 at 11:20
My friend acquired loan from a Banking company & liquidated entire amount in the year 2006.The Banking Co has served him a notice that he is in arrears of loan of Rs.67,355=00ps.He has not paid even a single rupee since July 2006.He took notice to advocate.Advocate assured my friend that Bank cannot now recover any sum from him & he should relax.He is worried and afraid of court proceedings.Plz advise w.r.law.
Thanks & Regards !
j
02 August 2011 at 10:05
court has directed to deposit. payment to Prothonotary & senior master, High Court, Mumbai. ? can be check of any bank or payorder/D.D. of nay bank? please advice.
thank you.
o
Anonymous
01 August 2011 at 21:23
sir i want a suggestion regarding order 23 rule 3a:- i have filed a regular case before the sub judge to set in a side a compromise decree on the ground of fruad which passed by munsuf court. sub judge given the judgement in the favour of resp.i filed appeal before additoinal district judge. additional district judge given in my favour.presently the case is pending before the high court , second appeal by other side,but most lawyer says that i will lose the case on the ground of oredr 23 rule3a, what will i do, can i file a case before munsaf as provision of order 23-3a , or wait till the judgement of high court
Anonymous
01 August 2011 at 20:56
hi sir,
Based on two willdeeds one which is the final willdeed executed by the testator, and proved with out suspicion about the contents of said willdeed. where as their is a willdeed prior to the above willdeed where their is a suspicion with regard to the NAMES, CONTENTS AND SIGNATURE of the WILL.
In such circumstances plz kindly send me any judgement either of HIGH COURT OR SUPREME COURT dismissing the claim based on the willdeed under suspicion cercumstances.
Anonymous
01 August 2011 at 20:47
my father mr.malla reddy is sucessed by 2 sons AKASH REDDY, NISHANT REDDY. i being the eldest son, based on a willdeed executed by my father in year 2003 and attested by one withness. i filed the suit for a partition. in that my brother filed a writen statement denying the willdeed of 2003. and for claiming right,and a another willdeed of 2002 alleged to have been executed by my father but,in the cross examination by my council, my brother admited that willdeed of 2002 does not bare the signature of my father. and further the witness examined by my brother pertaining to his willdeed, also admits that is not aware about the contents of willdeed but he says he signed the same as withness.
where the witness in my willdeed of 2003 as admited the contents of willdeed and so further stated that he signed as a withness in the presence of one person.
sir, in view of above facts and circumstances will i succeed based on my willdeed of 2003.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Suit for recovery
Hello Members
I filed a suit for recovery against the government department i.e. Haryana Warehousing Corporation, for the recovery of Rs.9 lac + interest, as they agreed with my client for taking the 2 plinths for storing the wheat on there. But the department had not paid me rent as agreed with them and I filed the suit for recovery. My suit was decreed with costs.
But the defendants filed the appeal and in which their appeal was partly allowed by which the Ld. ADJ had held that my suit was time barred as the same was instituted 1 year later from the date of claim.
As in the present case the plaintiff had filed the suit on 12.04.2006 and demanded rent from 31.07.2002 to 05.05.2005 which is beyond 3 years and as they were actually entitled to recover the rent only from 12.04.2003.
So my question is that can state government/ department can take the plea of time limitation.
As now i want to file the Regular second appeal, so tell me whether that plea can be challenged and if yes then what is the law provisions is applicable and latest case-law in this regard.
Thanks in advance.