Anonymous
17 September 2011 at 14:47
in an auction i was the highest bidder and got the allotment letter. after 3 years the u.i.t sent a letter of cancellation against which i filed injunction which is still pending in high court. the u.i.t evicted me saying that i have not fulfilled the conditions in allotment letter .i filed a case for which in 1984 the court restored the possession saying that proper proses should be followed to disposes but the cancellation was not set aside.till today i have the possession of the vacant plot unobstructed for 26 years.what should i do.i have not executed the lease deed.
chandrashekar
17 September 2011 at 14:07
one of my friend has signed a blank lawyer paper for some ancestral property issues so he is worried if that blank paper may be mis utlised by his brothers
so kindly let me know
Anonymous
17 September 2011 at 13:05
Under which provision, civil death declaration can be obtained from civil court ?
Anonymous
17 September 2011 at 12:51
I am owner of the property in mumbai. I let the said property to one Mr.X and since 30 years he is residing as tenat. Now i want that property for my personal use. The property is well managed by tenant. there is no enemity or any breach of condition by the tenant. but now i want it for personal use. what is the legal process i need to initiate? some one told me that we cannot vacate him as he is staying since 30 years.. if we go to court how much time it will take ?
Thanq for instant reply sir.. the tenant staying since 30 years, is it going to affect my case? my property is in mumbai, i heard maharashtra law protect tenant, is it?
Anonymous
17 September 2011 at 12:46
Sir/Mam,
My father and my uncle has a property. My father sell it to x. When my uncle oppose it, X wrote a registration cancelling on 100 rs stamp and got signed by my father & his own and took 70% money which X party gave 2 my father. When my father bag 4 land document, he refuses to do that so my father kept 25% of money in his account. But he didn't cancel his authority on that land.So my uncle went 2 court againt him and go 4 case. After that my father became 1 of the party in that case.
Than the decision came that land will be of X person and my uncle loose that case.
But no any comment was there in that case bout my father and also bout the money which he took through bank.
So my father went to highcourt against him but till today no any process is there in that case and X party has made a building on that land.
So please give ur comments that what should my father do 4 that.
rani----------
17 September 2011 at 11:36
My query is that some of the document which were important for the case, plaintiff were cross examined (2 plaintiff), when plaintiff were cross examined, defendants cross examined with such a document which doesn’t bear my signature that document were created by the, so during examination I deny those document because I am not the executants of the said document as it is not concerned with me, so plaintiff cross examination was concluded. now its defendants turn to be cross examined by plaintiffs, on the 1st day of cross examination defendants admits some document which bears his signatures, but after that day he started denying all the signatured documents (original + certified true copies) all documents concerning to defendants, all the original + certified documents were marked and exhibit on court records and the case is posted for final argument.
Question:-
1. Document not concerning plaintiff were put up in his cross examination in which he is not the executants of that document will this kind of documents be still be kept for record or it will go out of record as it is not concerning plaintiff.
2. Defendant signatured documents were denied by the defendants which are original and certified public document , wholly concerned with defendants as it is executed by them but they are denying execution also
3. Photocopied documents filled along with written statement now when we summoned the concerned authorities to produce original document in court , they say that the original documents are not traceable , photocopied document has defendant signature as photocopy , so will it be treated as secondary evidence , it is a kind of document in which a certified copy is only available to the executant of that document and not available to general public
arvind
17 September 2011 at 08:48
provision under which claimant can receive awarded amount on behalf of other claimant in m c p cases
Anonymous
17 September 2011 at 01:02
For possession of immovable property or any interest therein based on title time limit is of
Twelve years, When the possession of the defendant becomes adverse to the plaintiff.
Dear sir ,case is as follows:-
some property is leased out for 20 years in 1937 to 1947 by Mr A and after this tenancy is carried out orally by month by month and in 2007 Mr A died.
Mr B son of MR A has got title of property after his father death,nature of property is ancestral,
can suit can be filed as per limitation act
since time limit is for 12 years on the basis of title and son mr b has got title after his fathers death in 2007,
as per my view possesion becomes adverse to
son mr b only when he got title over the property and thus he can file a suit.
please give your opinion & the other ways by which suit for possesion can be filed
Anonymous
16 September 2011 at 23:26
Dear experts,
Please tell me if my son 23 years old working very well and drawing a salary of Rs30,000/- p. m. can make any claim on property bequeathed to me by my father through his registered will. The property was my father's self acquired property.
I want to disinherit my son from my movable & immovable assets.The question is about my father's self acquired property bequeathed to me by his regd. will.Can he raise any claim??
Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
What the remady against order u/o. 7 r.11 of cpc
Dear friends,
what the remady against dismissal of suit u/o. 7 R.11 of CPC ? Have you any judgment in this regard ?