Sumir
29 September 2011 at 22:30
If I want information regarding central government dispensaries, hospitals, clinics and other health units, where should I file RTI? Please give full address.
Anonymous
29 September 2011 at 17:20
I'm a retired Senior citizen(70yrs) living in a south Delhi rented accommodation for the past 30 yrs.Till now i was protected under the rent control act but recently my rent has gone above Rs3500.Now the landlord has filed a civil suit against me.Me & my wife live there.Is there any law under which senior citizens are protected?Do i have to vacate the premises?Can u guide me as to what best i can do?My lawyer says my case is weak so please help out.
Regards.
basavaraj shiromani
29 September 2011 at 16:02
1) Whether a legal heir of insolvent person can remit the debt to the creditors and thereby such legal heir is whether entitled to get discharge of the insolvency and further to get back the properties attached by court and manage through the court commissioner ?
2) A person was adjudicated as insolvent in the year 1954. The court had seized his property and the court receiver was appointed to administer the property and thereby work of the receiver was to get the yield of seized property of insolvent and to liquidate the debt of the creditors in due course of time. now insolvent is dead in the year 1978. The legal heirs of deceased insolvent came to know the decision of insolvency of their father and found that the properties of deceased insolvent are attached by court and court receiver is appointed and court receiver is also dead and he has not liquidated the debt of insolvent during his life time. under these circumstances the legal heir have come forward and approached the court and deposited the standing dues of creditors. now question is whether legal heirs can get back the properties under custody of court ?
Anonymous
29 September 2011 at 15:52
What is the effect of fake driving licence in claim cases in supreme court view?
Anonymous
29 September 2011 at 13:55
if sec 145 cr. p c applies in civil cases then kindly provide me any law related to this , so that executive magistrate can appoint Tehsildar as receiver of a dispute related to property
Thanks
Dharmendra More
29 September 2011 at 12:39
Can anyone make me clear on excess non-occupation charges that hsg society charges is as per suprem court interim relief.
Pls read this:
--
State Government’s Issue on NOC regulations in 2001, which fixed the ceiling on NOC at 10 percent of the maintenance charges, was challenged recently on 2/3/07, when Mount Blanc CHS at Peddar road filed a special leave petition (SLP no. 7964, 7965, 7966) and demanded interim relief and autonomous authority to decide upon the non-occupancy charges. This petition was called for hearing on 19th June; wherein the Supreme Court upheld the High court ruling but provided interim relief to Mount Blanc to charge 10 % of the rent recovered by the owner as NOC and not 10 % of the maintenance charges.
--
Two points from the extract above:
1. The Supreme Court upheld the High court ruling - Does it mean that NOC cannot be more than 10% of the service
charge for the society.
2. ... but provided interim relief to Mount Blanc to charge 10 % of the rent recovered by the owner as NOC and not 10 % of the maintenance charges
Does this mean that this was only applicable to Mount Blanc society?
Statement 1 and 2 appear contradictory - what proves in the judgement above (or any other judgement - please provide details) that a society cannot charge NOC more than 10% of the service/maintainance.
Unscrpulous societies under greed are even charging 100% more (double the maintainance charges) NOC as part of the total maintainance charge from owners of let-out proprties, when the facilities/services provided are the same to all.
Please provide legally acceptable pointers with details for the benefit of all.
Anonymous
29 September 2011 at 00:50
Ld Counsels,
Is there any prescribed time to cross examine wife in proceedings before the family court.
Thanks
Anonymous
28 September 2011 at 21:35
14. Exclusion of time of proceeding bona fide in court without jurisdiction -
(1) In computing the period of limitation for any suit the time during which the plaintiff has been prosecuting with due diligence another civil proceeding, whether in a court of first instance or of the appeal or revision, against the defendant shall be excluded, where the proceeding relates to the same matter in issue and is prosecuted in good faith in a court which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of a like nature, is unable to entertain it.
(2) In computing the period of limitation for any application, the time during which the applicant has been prosecuting with due diligence another civil proceeding, whether in a court of first instance or of appeal or revision, against the same party for the same relief shall be excluded, where such proceeding is prosecuted in good faith in a count of first instance or of appeal or revision, against the same party for the same relief shall be excluded, where such proceeding is prosecuted in good faith in a court which, from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of a like nature, is unable to entertain it.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 2 of Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), the provisions of sub-section (1) shall apply in relation to a fresh suit instituted on permission granted by the court under rule of that Order, where such permission is granted on the ground that the first suit must fail by reason of a defect in the jurisdiction of the court of other cause of a like nature.
Explanation - For the purpose of this section, -
(a) In excluding the time during which a former civil proceeding was pending, the day on which that proceeding was instituted and the day on which it ended shall both be counted;
(b) Plaintiff or an applicant resisting an appeal shall be deemed to be prosecuting a proceeding;
(c) Misjoinder of parties or of causes of action shall be deemed to be a cause of a like nature with defect of jurisdiction.
i want to know explanation (b) what does it means?
Anonymous
28 September 2011 at 20:52
Dear Experts,
Iam married 22 years. No DV filed by wife so far even though minor skirmishes took place like in any family. I want to file Judicial Separation case under Section 10 of HMA because of her many wrong doings and mental cruelty. After I file the case and notice is sent to her, what significance will a domestic violence complaint by her have on me. Please let me know all aspects as this possibility exists.She is earning very well and I have the proof.
With high regards to all experts.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Acquisition of land for running auto(public purpose)
Dear Sir,
Is it possible to procure land for public purpose(Running Auto, in case the real owner not allowed.
Current width is 4.5 ft.
Required ft 6 ft.
Real Facts:
We, 5 families in kerala using 100 years old driveway/pathway(Not panchayat driveway). Width of this driveway is 4.5ft.Now the new owner of this land restricted this driveway to 4 ft and said that as per Govt rules only 4 ft. Now he constructed wall in two sides of driveway because he is the owner of land situated in both sides of driveway.
We need 6 ft of width for running auto and we are ready to pay extra amount required for additional land. Free land is available. But the owner not allowed. Some patients are residing in these familes. I am a CA final stage candidate. This restricted drive way will affect my growth also.