Anonymous
02 October 2011 at 17:58
is it allowed to get par'ship regd any time if nt already 4 the purpose of filing suit as according to partenership act.can this defect be cured later if not already regd?
HARISH KUMAR
02 October 2011 at 15:00
ONE OF MY CLIENT SUPPLIED GOODS AND SERVICES TO THE TRUST. The Trust is unable to pay the credit. Whehter the creditor can file petition before the Commissioner , to wind up the trust , so as to recover his dues. Kindly send me the draft copy also. I am student of CA Final year and are working under legal lawyers since 12 years.
Anonymous
02 October 2011 at 12:29
Dear Sir,
Is it possible to procure land for public purpose(Running Auto, in case the real owner not allowed.
Current width is 4 ft.
Required ft 6 ft.
Real Facts:
We, 5 families in kerala using 100 years old driveway/pathway(Not panchayat driveway). Width of this driveway is 4.5ft.Now the new owner of this land restricted this driveway to 4 ft and said that as per Govt rules only 4 ft. Now he constructed wall in two sides of driveway because he is the owner of land situated in both sides of driveway.
We need 6 ft of width for running auto and we are ready to pay extra amount required for additional land. Free land is available. But the owner not allowed. Some patients are residing in these familes. I am a CA final stage candidate. This restricted drive way will affect my growth also.
Anonymous
02 October 2011 at 10:36
latest judgement of supremecourt on order 17 rule3 c.p.c
Anonymous
02 October 2011 at 10:35
latest judgement of supremecourt on order 17 rule3 c.p.c
Anonymous
02 October 2011 at 10:34
latest judgement of supremecourt on order 17 rule3 c.p.c
Anonymous
02 October 2011 at 10:32
In an oral agreement for sale a house, advance amount paid to the seller by bearer cheque in the presence of two witnesses. Details of payment was written on a plain paper (without any stamp) and signed by both parties, but signatures of witnesses were not taken. After that seller denying any oral agreement for sale and transaction. On the basis of these evidences, if I file a suit for refund/recovery of the amount before a court, can I succeed? How much these evidences are relevant and helpful for me?
yogesh
02 October 2011 at 08:39
Sir,
I have certain doubts in reagrds to Review Petition filed before HIGH court
Generally 112 CPC delas with filing Review Petition and Order XLVII deals with it..But at the same time it is stated that no second appeal lies from order made an appeal from order (if it dismissed by the court)
But in the case of writ petition order 47 of the code doesn't apply under Article 226 of the constitution(After amendment of section 141 of the code and insertion of explanation to that section)
My query is peratining to the following:
1 then under which provisions one can file Review of the order passed by the High Court under writ petition jurisdiction?
2 Whether review order (dismissal) of the High Court can be challnged before supreme court by the way of Special Leave Petition?
Regards
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Caveat 2
thankful to all but one
which court should caveat neccessarily be filed.is there any specific mention in cpc that certain courts are not allowed to entertain caveat?