Anonymous
04 October 2011 at 15:41
A MATTER OF SUPPRESSION AND MISREPRESENTATION OF FACTS WHICH AFFECTS FAIR VALUE DETERMINATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE REGISTERED FOR STAMP DUTY PURPOSE IS BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE REGISTERING AUTHORITY ALONG WITH DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE.
WHAT ARE STEPS WHICH THE REGISTERING AUTHORITY IS TO TAKE AS PER CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAW PROVISIONS.
MORE IMPORTANTLY THE SET FORTH CONSIDERATION IN INSTRUMENT(THIRTY LAKHS) IS NOT EVEN 13% OF THE FAIR MARKET VALUE(TWO CRORES SIXTY LAKHS) DETERMINED BY THE STAMP DUTY AUTHORITY.
IS NOT THE REGISTERING AUTHORITY SUPPOSED TO BRING THIS TO STATE GOVERNMENTS NOTICE FOR POSSIBLE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY.
IF THE R.O. APPEARS TO BE INFLUENCED, WHAT ARE THE AVAILABLE OPTIONS.
Anonymous
04 October 2011 at 14:53
shall not the assets of the organisation RESPONSIBLE be seized, liquidated and proceeds distributed among the victims family.this would have been the natural action in developed nation.
IS NOT THIS A FIT CASE FOR P.I.L, suo-motu proceedings, WHERE GOVERNMENT IS USING TAX PAYERS HARD EARNED MONEY TO PAY FOR MISTAKES OF PROFIT MOTIVATED ORGANISATION.
PLEASE GIVE YOUR VALUED ADVICE AS TO HOW THE MATTER SHALL BE PURSUED TO ACHIEVE A JUST CONCLUSION. or
RECOMMEND GOOD NGO WHO STAND FOR THIS CAUSE.
Ramesh
04 October 2011 at 12:55
Dear Sir,
I want to know in the specific performance suit decree in favour of plaintiff in this case the court directed defendant to execute a sale deed after the plaintiff deposits amount in th court.
In this case who should execute a sale deed whether court or defendant. There is no disupute on tile
hafsa
04 October 2011 at 12:00
Please clarify me on a point/statement below."If any misc application is pending before any court then court should first decide that application then move to the main case"
In my case i was on adjournment in one of my rent case and rent controller on last date of my adjournment take up my case allow my learned brother to cross examine applicant and close my side over ride DISMISSAL OF EJECTMENT APPLICATION filed by me on behalf of respondent which was pending from 3 month.
Anonymous
04 October 2011 at 11:34
Dear Sir,
I do a lease agreement on Rs.100/- stamp papers with witnesses and notary signed. But not registered. Terms of agreement was both lessor or lessee is restricted to 3 years i.e. lock in period 3 years. if anyone brack the rule then he should pay balance months rent from 36 months(want to vacant by either party).
Now the tenant(lessor) want to vacant the the premises after six months from start the agreement.
Is aggreement is vaild or not?
Can court give the relief to lessor?
any other thing that is in favour or agasint for lessor.
please suggust if any other thing is also in your way.
regards,
Rupesh Arora
Member (Account Deleted)
04 October 2011 at 09:31
R/Members,
if some one applied for the information under RTI Act and the information is not supplied after the expiry of time limitation even and for this the person can file consumer complaint for the default in service. if there any decision please provide a copy or reference of that.
thanks to all
arun shokeen
04 October 2011 at 06:27
Whats Question of LAw under Reference given Under CPC sec 113 of CPC 1908, please refer Latest Authorities of Supreme Court,Delhi High Court or Punjab and Haryan High Court any other high court also be useful but latest one ,it will be a favor for me
Anonymous
04 October 2011 at 06:19
As per Sec- 114 an Review lies where there is no Appeal lies against the Judgement ,is this is the Appeal against Decree i.e as provided under sec 96 to 99A or Second Appeal i.e Appeal against Judgement of High Court or it can be against the decision of Appeal in Supreme Court.
It is a Question raised in jwala Prashad Versus Jwala bank decided by Allahabad High court in 1961 but after that i not find any suitable or latest authorities and neither able to get my query answered. so it will be a favor for me, If LCI Experts help me in that
Anonymous
04 October 2011 at 02:00
can a document a certified copy admitted in evidence after opposite party is sent notice to produce and failed in producing original.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Will and its contents.
Hello,
My grand father died in 1980 leaving a Will in favor of my father and uncle which related to a House and whose contents were as follows -
"My house will be inherited by my younger son who lives with me and he will be free to use the same in any manner he desires.He will pay a sum of Rs. 1 lakh to my elder son as compensation for retaining the house."
My father and uncle filed the will for probate in the court which was contested by some other tenants of the house and delayed and the probate of the will could only be possible after 12 years in 1992.
My uncle and father expired but his wife has sold away this above mentioned house 2 years back without my knowledge and consent and without even paying me those mentioned 1 lakh.
My Ques. now are -
1. Can my aunt sell this house without paying us the said 1 Lakh.Is it legal or Illegal.
2. Can she sell this house without our knowledge or any kind of approval from us.
3. As times have changed and the value of 1 Lakh is not much now as compared to 1980 can this amount be increased as per Cost Inflation Index or some other kind of valuations as value of Dollar to Rupee as used in some other places where correct valuation is needed.
What kind of legal remedies can i look forward to this matter now.
Thank you.