Anonymous
05 October 2011 at 21:30
Hello,
My father is not keeping in good health so he gave me a Power of Attorney regarding the use and maintenance of his properties without any considerations .
While going thorough the POA my friend suggested to me that there was a mistake made by the Deed Writer in the POA. He states that at the end of the POA it mentions that it is an Irrevocable POA and such POA cant be Irrevocable.
Is he right and if so what remedies do i have.
Anonymous
05 October 2011 at 21:24
i wants to file a suit for declaration for, cancellation a ragistered sale deed,one is made in 1996 and than after the other is in 2005.but i came to know the both sale deed in 2010, when i received a copy of the sale deed. can any limitation of time, restricte me for filing a suit? if yes than what is remedy for me?
Anonymous
05 October 2011 at 19:27
Respected sir,
A person who take a lone from me and give me cheques.but unfortunately he died unmarried during pendency of case.his legal heirs is his father,mother and two married sisters.he was a person who had a share in coparcenary property but now he is no more. so can i claim my money to his any legal heirs on basis of his property or any other ground .One expert told me that according to sec 229 of mulla's hindu Law in Principal of hindu law, after death of any coparcener other alive coparcener would get share of that coparcener as survivor not as successor and he told also that in any circumstances the survivor would not be responsible for any loan on cheque or any other sours get by died coparcener in his lifetime.he told if there any male issue is present in case than he would accountable for that but in my case after death of that person the alive coparcener is his father.(mother and two married sister are not a coparcener).and he get benefit of share of that person in the HUF property on the basis of survivor/the only alive coparcener.
Sir please tell that on which basis i will present my civil suit on his father for the recovery of my money on the ground of bounced cheque.is his father is responsible to pay the loan by his son in any circumstances. if any one known any order passed by any High court or Supreme Court Of India having similarities as my case,i would like to purchase that order.
Please Help me
Anonymous
05 October 2011 at 15:28
Sir,
Now a days computer is owned and easily available to lot of people than 10-15 years back. In Computer pdf format number of books can be copied with sharp impression either enlarged or compressed. Any unscrupulous person can and are deceiving persons after copying signature from the pdf format page usually cut and past signature with the help of computer and pdf format programmes and xerox machines.
If the document happens to be sale deed, settlement deed, adoption deed, conveyance deed, gift deed, will, relinquishment deed, assignment deed etc. and bore as it is signature of a person on the document by copying xerox or computer. Then the person who obtained such malafide signature will insist as genuine signature and even file in the court and in the process may cheat many people. The victim will come to know only in the court when the forged document is filed.
What is the remedy to set right such people in our Indian Constitution. Please suggest civil as well as criminal laws against such people.
Thanking You,
M.S.N.
Anonymous
05 October 2011 at 12:13
Is sexual or love making chattings and emails of that nature prior and after marriage is legally objectionable or not?
Will it be considered as mental harassment to the wife in the court of law?
Any judgements in this regard, Kindly quote the authority.
Anonymous
05 October 2011 at 11:43
Dear sirs,
Could you send me citations of of case laws regarding execution of sale deed
regards
Anonymous
05 October 2011 at 10:19
Hi Experts,
one old person age 75 years made will in favour of their grandsons in the year 2008 this will was registered from sub registrar,afterwards the daughter of old man took away from her pareatral home & kept in her matrimonial home & on 8/8/2011 old man transfered that property to his daughter`s name & got register it on the consideration of Rs 1,91,000/ which he did not take in the office of sub registrar but mentioned in document.old man is patient of paraslyse from right side & not able to speak properly.In his will he put sign in urdu & mark tumb impression but in registrary he marked thumb impression not singed anywhere & he did not cancel his will.Both grandsons are major,in will speceificaly mentioned that it is present & future will after his death.One identifiefing person wants to give witness in the favor of grandsons.Property still under possession of his grandsons ?
Plz guide me what remedy can take grandsons ?
Which type of suit can be filed & to whom against ?
Can transfer of document ie registrary can be cancelled & what is the procedure for it?
Anonymous
05 October 2011 at 08:19
dear sirs,
my maid living in vileparle,in a slum which is in best locality.owner of same was purchased said property in 1987 & ragistered same but he not performed convence deed.now in 2007 old owner again sold land to other party & transfered convence to him.now in fight of 3 owner slum dwellers are stucked.no one want to compromise.so can we go to MHADA diectly for devlopement of same under sra or what is the other way to get rid of this situation.this is a one of the prime location in vileparle east ,mumbai.now we want solution withought concern of all owners,all members are ready for a safe & better way.
Anonymous
05 October 2011 at 08:04
what is the exact citation of
" Balambal vs Kannammal Alias Pazhaniammal "
case regarding maintainability of civil death declaration....
any other case law do lemme know...
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Amendment of plaint, c.p.c.,
sir, the husband had filed a suit against the wife for declaration, to declare him as the owner to the fixed deposit amounts standing in the name of his wife. i am appearing for the wife. wife had wihthdrawn the fixed deposit amounts before summons were served. wife had also filed a memo stating that suit scheduled money is not in existence the husband had filed a petition for amendment of plaint to amend the that he had issued notice to bank not to permit the wife to withdraw the amounts. but the bank had not informed us about that, and we are not aware whether any such notice was given by the plaintiff husband. in the meanwhile we had filed a petition for rejection of plaint on the grounds that 1) as the fixed deposits stands in the name of the wife she is the absolute owner of the property and has all right to withdraw. 2)
recieved summons only after she had withdrawn the said amounts and also filed a memo to that effect hence a suit cannot maintained for a property which is not in existence. Please answer my query with some relevant supreme court decisions. thank you.