Anonymous
19 November 2011 at 21:54
in partition suit, our prayer is only for partition and devide for agriculture land then valuation of the property is required? or suit valuation is barred for jurisdiction? or in partition suit pecunary jurisdiction decide the courts jurisdiction?
Anonymous
19 November 2011 at 20:35
R/Sir/Mam
My execution petition is pending in Karnal civil judge court,JD never appeared in the court during suit for recovery and thereafter in execution petition and court finding no way ordered for attachment of property of JD but as JD have no any moveable or immoveable property at Karnal rather JD head office is situated at Rohtak, i filed a application for transfer my execution to Rohtak alongwith an supporting affidavit regarding having property at Rohtak by JD But now court has asked me to submit documentary proof to the effect that JD is having property at Rohtak
.Kindly suggest me whether proof is mandatory in given facts where i have already filed affidavit along with application to this effect.I have no proof but JD is running his business in a big office at Rohtak and i intends to attach JD bank account or his car etc. Kindly help.Regards Ajai
Anonymous
19 November 2011 at 19:27
i deleted subject becoz nobody knows it.this site need more experts
Anonymous
19 November 2011 at 17:45
Dear Expert,
My father have two wives. My father died last year.
My father has two types of properties.
1] Agricultural land which was purchased by my grand father.
2] Land which is purchased by my father out of his earned income.
I am son from second wife.
My father gave the property to step brothers which is mentioned in point no 1] above.
point No 2] property is given to me.
My step brothers sold the agricultural land. But still I have not sold my land.
Now my step brother wants share of this land which is in my possession.
Will he succeed.
Note: Plot of land given to me by my father which is clearly out of his earned income.
Kindly guide
MSC Shekar
19 November 2011 at 16:54
Information required on a famous case of Andhra Pradesh high court Civil Suit 7 of 1958 and Civil Suit 14 of 1958.
In this suit some party has filed an Exhibit belonging to the Director of Treasuries and Accounts,Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad / Joint Director Pension Payment office, Hyderabad / Assistant Pension payment office,STO - Motigalli Hyderabad have filed "AUDIT REPORT OF THE THEN TREASURY OF THE YEAR 1950".
This exhibit is lying in the same court since then. I need the MP No. and other details.
Please provide the required info.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
19 November 2011 at 16:27
in an auction i was given allotment letter in it there were some conditions which i did not follow.so the uit forcefully dispossessed me and cancelled my allotment.i went for injunction and a civil suit.in spite of injunction the uit dispossessed me from the plot in 1965 without any proper notice.i lost in trail court .the issue of cancellation was dropped by court saying that i had not paid sufficient court fee only dispossession matter was taken up. in the order dated 1983 of high court the court restored my possession but left to the uit to follow proper proses if the were to disposes me.till today i am in possession of the plot, uit has not taken any action, my query is if now i apply for lease deed will the uit wake up and initiate any thing as the value is in crore's.and what are the safeties i should follow ,delay was due to encroachment litigation which is decided now in 2011 .thanks in advance.
Ravi Kumar
19 November 2011 at 13:26
Hello Sir / Madam,
I kindly request your valuable advise on the following situation:
Currently am planning to buy 3 cents of land from the Land owner and when i collected the documents copies from him found that,
1. In the year 1996 the current land owner has executed a sale Agreement with the old owner, and since the old owner was not abiding the points mentioned on the agreement and was not willing to register the land since he wanted more money than what was agreed initially, the current owner has approached court and filed a case based on the sale agreement.
2. In the year 2003 the court favors the current owner and judgement was Ex Party Decree since the old owner has not attended any hearing from 1996 till 2003.
3, Based on the judgement offered, In 2005 the court, Addl Judge, has registered the land and offered the same to the current owner. So the current owner got the land registered through court.
4. In the year 2007 the current land owner sold a part of the land to another person and now has the other half.
5. Now currently am trying to purchase a part of the land he has.
My query is whether there is a chance that old owner could appeal now? opposing the Exparty decree judgement issued by court in 2003.
Please advise on what to be done to me to be safe after the purchase of land? or should i look for another property?
Many thanks,
Ravi Kumar
91 9363125001
siri
19 November 2011 at 10:09
CLARIFY WHETHER BELOW MENTIONED RELIEF PRAYER ATTRACTS COURT FEE AS PER PERMANENT INJUCTION OR as per TITLE DECLARATION
1)That by passing declaratory permanent injuction decree in favour of plantiff and against defendant the plaintiff is the absolute owner and in possession of mentioned scheduled property
2)PLZ give declaratory decree of permanent injuction against defendant the defendant had no right title & restrict him not to disturb the Plantiff rightful ownership rights for mentioned scheduled property
If above 2 points is not so good then give correct Techno legal terms for praying in court for decree of injuction / declaration which attracts only nominal court fee but in final decree Plantiff should be declare as Absolute owner i.e Plantiff should get ownership rights for said property with out praying Title declaration in court
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Partition suit
under which act and which section we can file a partition suit( suit for partition} in annecestral property?